ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2603

Are There Differences In Limited Systemic Sclerosis According To Extension Of Skin Involvement?

Marina Scolnik1, Eliana Lancioni2, Luis J. Catoggio1, Mirtha Sabelli3, Zaida Bedran4, Carla Saucedo4, Josefina Marin3 and Enrique Soriano1, 1Rheumatology Section, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2Rheumatology Unit, Internal Medicine Services, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3Rheumatology Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4Rheumatology Unit, Internal Medical Services, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud’s - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: There is consensus in classifying Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) according to extension of skin involvement as limited and diffuse, using the elbows and knees as “limits” to distinguish between them. Decades ago, Barnett classified SSc as Type 1(only sclerodactyly), Type 2 (acrosclerosis – distal but may reach up to elbows and/or knees plus face) and Type 3 (diffuse skin involvement). Patients with Type 2 had an intermediate degree of organ involvement compared to Type 1 (less) and Type 3 (more). This issue has not been recently addressed. We examined the characteristics of our patients with limited disease to see if we could find differences between Barnett Type 1 and Type 2 subsets.

Methods: electronic medical records of patients registered between years 2000-2011 with the problem: scleroderma, SSc or CREST and those with anti Scl-70, anticentromere or anti nucleolar antibodies in laboratory database were reviewed. Cases fulfilling ACR 1980 criteria were included and were classified as diffuse or limited according to LeRoy`s criteria with limited being separated into sclerodactyly (only fingers) and acrosclerosis (fingers and up to elbows and/or knees) (Barnett´s Types 1 and 2).

Results: 234 SSc patients (216 females) fulfilled criteria. Female/male ratio was 12:1; 24% had diffuse SSc and 76% limited (64% sclerodactyly and 12% acrosclerosis). Total follow up was 688 patients-years. Over half (55.1%) are still under our care and 17 died during this period. Ten year survival rate was 80% for limited and 70% for diffuse variants respectively (HR: 0.88 95% CI: 0.7-1.1). Table 1 shows clinical and serological profile of this cohort.

Anti Scl-70 was present in 16%, anticentromere in 53% and nucleolar ANA in 7% of overall patients. Within the limited group, several characteristics in the acrosclerosis (Type 2) group were more similar to the diffuse than the Type 1(sclerodactyly) patients. Duration of Raynaud was shorter, and they had significantly more anti Scl-70 and less anti centromere antibodies than those with Type 1. In particular, interstitial lung disease (ILD) was significantly more prevalent in Type 2 group, and similar to Type 3. Other characteristics did not reach statistical differences.

Conclusion: These results appear to confirm that extension of skin involvement within limited SSc may identify two different subsets with clinical and serologic characteristics. Indeed, Type 2 as defined by Barnett appears to have intermediate organ involvement, and serology may be more similar to the diffuse type.

Table 1 Clinical and serological profile of this cohort

Type of systemic sclerosis

                           Limited

                         (n=178)

                        

Diffuse

(n=56)

 

     Sclerodactyly 

        (n=149)

     Acrosclerosis

          (n=29)

         p

(sclero vs acro)

            p

(limited vs diffuse)

Females, n (%)

142 (95.3)

25 (86.2)

0.06

49 (87.5)

0.13

Age at diagnosis, years mean (SD)

59.8 (15.2)

54.9 (16.2)

0.14

53 (18.3)

0.038

Duration of raynaud before diagnosis, years median (SD)

9.2 (3.4)

5.5 (1)

0.018

1.9 (0.8)

0.008

Anti Scl-70, %

6.4

 

39.3

 

<0.001

43.9

<0.001

Anticentromere,%

82.3

 

17.9

 

<0.001

4.8

 

<0.001

Nucleolar ANA, %

5.7

 

3.6

 

0.54

20.9

 

0.001

Other autoantibodies, %

26.1

23.5

 

0.54

25.9

0.76

GI involvement, %

65.9

 

81.3

 

0.22

64.3

0.45

Interstitial lung disease, %

17.1

50

<0.001

65.3

<0.001

Pulmonary hypertension with ILD,%

5.5

0

0.34

15.4

0.03

Pulmonary hypertension (without ILD), %

9.1 

4.8

0.45

2.6

0.39

Echocardiographic abnormalities (other than PH), %

5.7

4.5

0.65

10

0.26

Digital ulcers, %

26.9

34.5

0.44

32.1

0.86

Renal Crisis, n

0

0

 

1

 

Pregnancy after diagnosis, n

3

1

 

3

 

Patient-year, years (SD)

462 (3.1)

81.2 (3.1)

 

144.8 (3.6)

 

Currently followed, n (%)

88 (59.5)

15 (51.7)

 

26 (46.4)

 

Died under our care, n

11

2

 

4

 

Scl-70: anti-topoisomerase I; ANA: antinuclear antibodies; GI: gastrointestinal; ILD: interstitial lung disease; PH: pulmonary arterial hypertension


Disclosure:

M. Scolnik,
None;

E. Lancioni,
None;

L. J. Catoggio,
None;

M. Sabelli,
None;

Z. Bedran,
None;

C. Saucedo,
None;

J. Marin,
None;

E. Soriano,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-there-differences-in-limited-systemic-sclerosis-according-to-extension-of-skin-involvement/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology