ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 140

Are Entheses Ultrasound Findings Similar in Axial Spa Patients and in Athletes?

Marie-Alix Lanfranchi1, Olivier Leluc2, Alice Tavano3, Vincent Pradel4, Sophie Morange5, Christophe Chagnaud3, Pierre Lafforgue1 and Thao Pham1, 1Rheumatology, APHM, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France, 2Rheumatology, APHM, Marseille, France, 3Radiology, APHM, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France, 4Epidemiology, APHM, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France, 5Center for Clinical Investigation, APHM, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: enthesis, spondylarthritis and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases: Ultrasound

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) are characterized by inflammatory and structural changes in the entheses (enthesitis). However, enthesitis is not only observed in SpA and can also be seen after a hypersollicitation of the enthese as during intensive sport.

The purpose of the study was to compare ultrasound (US) findings of entheses between 3 groups: axial SpA patients, athletes and healthy controls.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of 30 axial SpA (2009ASAS criteria), 30 athletes and 30 controls. Athlete subjects practiced a sport resulting in a strain on lower limbs, such as running or soccer, at least 6 hours per week. Controls practiced less than an hour per week. Clinical evaluation and US were performed at the same day. Physicians performing clinical and US examination were blinded to each other. The US was performed at by two radiologists, using both grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) for calculation of the MASEI index (Madrid Sonographic Enthesis Index) and the analysis of its subitems (bursistis, calcification, erosion, power doppler, thicknening of tendon, structural change) (Toshiba Aplio 500, linear transducer, frequency of 6–18 MHz). Analysis: To compare groups we used chi-square and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction for post-hoc tests (depending on categorical/continuous variables), and Mann Whitney test for correlation (SPSS 17.0 version).

Results

Patients and controls demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in table 1. In SpA patients mean (SD) BASDAI and ASDAS were 3,14 (1,9) and 1,78 (1,01), respectively. Mean MASEI and each sub-item scores were significantly different between SpA patients and both healthy control groups. There was no difference between athlete and non-athlete groups. No correlation between heel pain and MASEI score or PD of the calcaneal enthese was found. The inter-reader correlation for MASEI scoring was 0.68 (Cohen’s kappa coefficient).

Conclusion

The MASEI score was significantly higher in patients with SpA compared to healthy control, athletes and non-athletes. Even if the MASEI score was somewhat higher in the athlete group than in the non-athlete control group, the difference was not significant. The 17-cutoff seems relevant to distinguish SpA from control, whatever their physical activity.

 

SpA

(n= 30)

Athletes

(n= 30)

Non-athlete controls

(n= 29)

p

Age, years (mean, SD)

36 (7)

29 (9)

30 (8)

 

Gender, male (%)

70.0

70.0

41.4

 

Heel pain, ever (%)

55.2

20.7

0

 

CRP  (mg/l) (mean, SD)

4 (11)

2 (7)

2 (3)

 

HLA B27 + (%)

51.1

3.4

3.4

 

X-rays sacroiliitis ≥3 (%)

86.7

3.6

10.3

 

ASAS criteria + (%)

100

0

0

 

MASEI  score (mean, SD)

26.3 (13)

12.2 (7)

10.4 (6)

<0.0001

MASEI > 17 (%)

70.0

16.7

14.3

<0.0001


Disclosure:

M. A. Lanfranchi,
None;

O. Leluc,
None;

A. Tavano,
None;

V. Pradel,
None;

S. Morange,
None;

C. Chagnaud,
None;

P. Lafforgue,
None;

T. Pham,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-entheses-ultrasound-findings-similar-in-axial-spa-patients-and-in-athletes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology