ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2237

Application and Feasibility of Proposed Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Reproductive Health Care Quality Indicators At a Public Urban Rheumatology Clinic

Itziar Quinzanos1, Angela Keniston2, Joann Zell3, Jinoos Yazdany4, Alyssa Nash1, Rebecca Fransen1, Jennifer Stichman1 and Joel M. Hirsh5, 1Dept Medicine, Denver Health Med Ctr, Denver, CO, 2Department of Medicine, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, 3Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 4Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 5Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: pregnancy, quality of care, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Reproductive health quality indicators (QIs) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have recently been developed: anti-ssA, anti-ssB, and phospholipid antibody (aPL) screening prior to pregnancy; appropriate treatment of pregnancy associated anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome (PAPS); and counseling regarding risk and contraception in women taking potentially teratogenic medications (methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, or thalidomide).  We examined performance on these QIs, their feasibility for use in a safety net rheumatology clinic, as well as sociodemographic predictors of higher performance.   

Methods: Using data from the Denver Health (DH) electronic health record (EHR), we identified rheumatology clinic patients seen between July 2006 and August 2011 who had SLE, were female, and were between the ages of 18-50 years. We queried sociodemographic and other data from the EHR including age, race/ethnicity, primary language, use of interpreter services, and primary payer. Manual EHR review was conducted to determine adherence to the QIs.  As a measure of feasibility, we tracked the time spent extracting the QIs. We calculated performance on each measure.  For the QI regarding teratogenicity counseling, which had the largest number of eligible patients, we used either chi-square or Student’s t-tests to identify the relationship between demographic characteristics and performance.

Results: 137 female SLE patients aged 18-50 years were identified. Of these, 15 were postmenopausal or status post tubal ligation or hysterectomy. Twelve pregnancies were documented during this 5-year period.  Performance on the QI regarding anti-ssA, anti-ssB or aPL testing was 100%.  We were unable to assess QI#2 as no pregnant patient met criteria for PAPS. 65 patients (53%) received potentially teratogenic medications. Only 30 of these patients (46%) had documented discussions about these medications’ potential risk to a developing fetus upon their initiation. Age was the only sociodemographic or other variable and that predicted performance on QI#3. Patients who received teratogenicity counseling were younger on average than those who did not (29 + 8 and 35 + 10 respectively, p-value = 0.0073).  The chart review time was 46 hours.

Conclusion: The new SLE reproductive health QIs allowed us to detect an important gap in counseling regarding the teratogenic risk of medications in our public health academic clinic. Greater attention to this issue is needed as only about half the patients of childbearing age received appropriate counseling, with older reproductive age women having the largest gap in care.  Although extraction of the QIs was technically feasible, the time for manual EHR review was long.  Electronic specification of these measures may be one way to reduce their collection burden in the future.


Disclosure:

I. Quinzanos,
None;

A. Keniston,
None;

J. Zell,
None;

J. Yazdany,
None;

A. Nash,
None;

R. Fransen,
None;

J. Stichman,
None;

J. M. Hirsh,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/application-and-feasibility-of-proposed-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-reproductive-health-care-quality-indicators-at-a-public-urban-rheumatology-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology