ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2356

Antirheumatic Therapy Is Not Associated with Changes in Circulating N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Thao Nguyen1, Gia Deyab 2, Morten Fagerland 3, Stefan Agewall 3, Gro Eilertsen 4, Mark Feinberg 5, Knut Mikkelsen 6, Øystein Førre 3 and Ivana Hollan 7, 1Lillehammer Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Lillehammer, Norway, 2Innlandet Hospital Trust, Bærum, Akershus, Norway, 3Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway, 5Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women´s Hospital, Boston, Boston, MA, 6Lillehammer Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Lillehammer, Oppland, Norway, 7Lillehammer Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Lillehammer, Oppland, Norway

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: heart disease and biomarkers, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster III: Safety and Outcomes

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are predisposed to impaired cardiac function and heart failure (HF). While the pathophysiology has not been fully elucidated yet, inflammation is suspected to play an important role. However, the impact of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on cardiac dysfunction in RA remains controversial. Although anti-inflammatory drugs might have protective effects, some of them, i.e. tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF), might also negatively influence cardiac function. Serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (s-NT-proBNP) is used as a biomarker of cardiac function, and levels ≤125 ng/L with high probability exclude HF1. 

To examine effects of methotrexate (MTX) and anti-TNF regimens on s-NT-proBNP in patients with active RA, and to assess associations between s-NT-proBNP and endothelial function (EndoF).

Methods: From the observational PSARA study, we examined 64 RA patients starting with MTX monotherapy (n=34) or anti-TNF with MTX co-medication (n=30) due to active disease. All patients starting with anti-TNF regimens had been previously unsuccessfully treated with MTX. s-NT-proBNP (ELISA), EndoF (measured by finger plethysmography), and other laboratory and clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 6 weeks and 6 months of treatment.

Results: Median age was 57 years (range 28-79), and 73% were women. 17 (27%) patients had CVD (history of angina, MI, heart surgery, PTA, cerebrovascular disease, thromboembolism, aortic aneurysm, peripheral artery disease). None of the patients had known/symptomatic HF. There were no statistically significant differences between s-NT-proBNP levels at baseline (median 2241 ng/L [IQR 9002]) and after 6 weeks (median 2300 ng/L, [IQR 8960]) and 6 months (median 2358 ng/L [IQR 7772]) of antirheumatic therapy (p=0.992 and p=0.528, respectively). There were no significant differences in the effects of MTX monotherapy and anti-TNF regimens on s-NT-proBNP levels (pbaseline-6weeks=0.779; pbaseline-6months=0.421). At baseline, 57 (89%) patients had s-NT-proBNP >125 ng/L, and 44 (69%) had high s-NT-proBNP levels (s-NT-proBNP >450 ng/L in patients < 50 years old and >900 ng/L in patients ≥50 years old), and these frequencies did not significantly change with antirheumatic treatment. s-NT-proBNP was not related to EndoF.

Conclusion: A large proportion of RA patients without known HF had elevated s-NT-proBNP levels, which might indicate subclinical impairment of cardiac function. s-NT-proBNP levels were not influenced by six-month MTX and/or anti-TNF treatment. Thus, in contrast to some previous studies, our data does not support the notion that anti-inflammatory treatment protects against HF, and that anti-TNF treatment has negative effect on cardiac function in RA. Nevertheless, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn by our study, e.g. due to limitations of s-NT-proBNP as surrogate marker of HF. Cardiac function in terms of s-NT-proBNP levels was not related to EndoF.

Reference

Ponikowski P et al. European journal of heart failure. 2016;18:891-975.


Abstract NT-pro-BNP – Table 1 Baseline characteristics pdf


Disclosure: T. Nguyen, None; G. Deyab, None; M. Fagerland, None; S. Agewall, None; G. Eilertsen, None; M. Feinberg, None; K. Mikkelsen, None; �. Førre, None; I. Hollan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nguyen T, Deyab G, Fagerland M, Agewall S, Eilertsen G, Feinberg M, Mikkelsen K, Førre �, Hollan I. Antirheumatic Therapy Is Not Associated with Changes in Circulating N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antirheumatic-therapy-is-not-associated-with-changes-in-circulating-n-terminal-pro-brain-natriuretic-peptide-levels-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antirheumatic-therapy-is-not-associated-with-changes-in-circulating-n-terminal-pro-brain-natriuretic-peptide-levels-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology