ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2269

Anti-NET Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Antibody-positive Patients: Results from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) Clinical Database and Repository (“Registry”)

Yu (Ray) Zuo1, Sherwin Navaz1, Alex Tsodikov1, Katarina Kmetova2, Claire Hoy1, Srilakshmi Yalavarthi1, Danieli Castro Oliveira de Andrade3, Maria G. Tektonidou4, Savino Sciascia5, Vittorio Pengo6, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza7, H Michael Belmont8, maria gerosa9, Paul fortin10, Guilherme de Jesús11, D. Ware Branch12, Laura Andreoli13, Esther Rodriguez Almaraz14, Michelle Petri15, Ricard Cervera16, Rohan Willis17, Doruk Erkan18 and Jason S Knight19, 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 3Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 4National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 5University of Turin, Torino, Italy, 6Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy, 7Autoimmune Diseases Research Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Cruces, UPV/EHU, Barakaldo, Spain, 8NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, 9University of Milan, Milano, Italy, 10CHU de Québec, Pavillon CHUL, Québec, Canada, 11Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 12University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 13Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy, 14Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, 15Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Baltimore, MD, 16Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 17University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 18Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 19University of Michigan, Division of Rheumatology, Ann Arbor, MI

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: antiphospholipid syndrome, neutrophils

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Abstracts: Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 5:00PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: The release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) by hyperactive neutrophils plays a role in the thromboinflammatory phenotype of APS. Previous work has demonstrated that some patients with APS have autoantibodies targeting NETs, which impair NET clearance and potentially activate complement. Here, we aimed to elucidate the presence, clinical associations, and antigen specificities of anti-NET antibodies in a large, ethnically diverse cohort of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients who did not have lupus.

Methods: Levels of anti-NET IgG/IgM were determined in sera of 308 patients with primary APS and 81 patients who were aPL positive but without “criteria” APS manifestations or other systemic autoimmune disease diagnosis. A positive cut-off for anti-NET level was established at the 99th percentile optical density of healthy-control samples. Multivariate logistic regression with best variable model selection was used to determine clinical associations. For a subset of patients (n=214), we profiled autoantibodies with a microarray platform that included 120 potential autoantigens (66 associated with NETs based on literature mining).

Results: We found elevated levels of anti-NET IgG or IgM in 45% of aPL-positive patients, whether they met criteria for primary APS or not (Figure 1A-B). There was a strong relationship between anti-NET IgG and anti-NET IgM (r=0.52, p< 0.0001). High anti-NET antibody levels correlated with a circulating marker of NETs, myeloperoxidase (MPO)-DNA complexes (IgG r=0.12, p=0.02; IgM r=0.16, p=0.001). Anti-NET activity also demonstrated a positive correlation with levels of traditional aPL (anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I IgG: r=0.21, p< 0.0001) and anticardiolipin IgG: r=0.19, p=0.0001). When considering clinical manifestations among aPL-positive patients, positive anti-NET IgG was strongly associated with brain white matter changes after adjusting for demographic variables and criteria aPL profiles (OR=11, 95% CI 1.9 to 62), but not with other aPL-related manifestations. By immunofluorescence microscopy, we determined that high anti-NET sera more efficiently deposited complement C3d on NETs. In pursuit of the antigen specificity of anti-NET antibodies, 214 samples were analyzed by autoantibody microarray. Anti-NET IgG positivity significantly associated with the following antigens: citrullinated-histone H1 and H4, MPO-DNA complexes, nucleosomes, centromere protein A (a histone H3 variant), heparan sulfate proteoglycan, laminin, and collagen VI. Meanwhile, anti-NET IgM positivity associated with the following: single-stranded DNA, double-stranded DNA, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

Conclusion: In summary, these data reveal high levels of anti-NET antibodies in 45% of aPL-positive patients wherein they potentially activate the complement cascade and contribute to white matter changes. While anti-NET IgM may especially target DNA in NETs, anti-NET IgG appear more likely to target protein antigens.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. A-B, Anti-NET IgG and IgM were measured in the indicated groups; no patients in this cohort had lupus. As compared with healthy controls, high levels of anti-NET IgG and IgM were found in aPL-positive patients with no criteria manifestations (“aPL positive”), thrombotic manifestations, or obstetric manifestations. Levels of anti-NET IgG and IgM at 450-nm optical density (OD) were compared to Control by Kruskal–Wallis test corrected for multiple comparisons by Dunn’s method; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ****p<0.0001. Horizontal black lines indicate medians and dashed lines indicate 99th percentile cut-offs.


Disclosures: Y. Zuo, None; S. Navaz, None; A. Tsodikov, None; K. Kmetova, None; C. Hoy, None; S. Yalavarthi, None; D. Castro Oliveira de Andrade, None; M. Tektonidou, None; S. Sciascia, None; V. Pengo, None; G. Ruiz-Irastorza, None; H. Belmont, None; m. gerosa, None; P. fortin, None; G. de Jesús, None; D. Branch, None; L. Andreoli, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Werfen; E. Rodriguez Almaraz, None; M. Petri, Exagen, AstraZeneca, Alexion, Amgen, AnaptysBio, Argenx, Aurinia, Biogen, Caribou Biosciences, CVS Health, EMD Serono, Eli Lilly, Emergent Biosolutions, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), IQVIA, Janssen, Kira Pharmaceuticals, MedShr, Sanofi, SinoMab, Thermofisher, BPR Scientific Advisory Committee; R. Cervera, None; R. Willis, None; D. Erkan, None; J. Knight, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zuo Y, Navaz S, Tsodikov A, Kmetova K, Hoy C, Yalavarthi S, Castro Oliveira de Andrade D, Tektonidou M, Sciascia S, Pengo V, Ruiz-Irastorza G, Belmont H, gerosa m, fortin P, de Jesús G, Branch D, Andreoli L, Rodriguez Almaraz E, Petri M, Cervera R, Willis R, Erkan D, Knight J. Anti-NET Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Antibody-positive Patients: Results from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) Clinical Database and Repository (“Registry”) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anti-net-antibodies-in-antiphospholipid-antibody-positive-patients-results-from-the-antiphospholipid-syndrome-alliance-for-clinical-trials-and-international-networking-aps-action-clinical-database/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anti-net-antibodies-in-antiphospholipid-antibody-positive-patients-results-from-the-antiphospholipid-syndrome-alliance-for-clinical-trials-and-international-networking-aps-action-clinical-database/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology