ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1021

Anti-IFNAR Treatment Does Not Reverse Neuropsychiatric Disease in MRL/lpr Lupus Mice

Michelle Huang1, Ariel Stock 2, Elise Mike 2, Roland Kolbeck 3 and Chaim Putterman 4, 1Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, 2Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 3MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD, 4Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: interferon, mouse and auto-immunity, Nervous system lupus, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: SLE – Etiology & Pathogenesis Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Many systemic lupus erythematosus patients display a type I interferon (IFN) signature, and IFNα levels and gene signatures have been positively correlated with disease severity. Previous studies blocking the type I IFN pathway systemically in lupus models have seen some beneficial effects in attenuating both systemic and renal disease. However, its effects on the neuropsychiatric manifestations have yet to be assessed, even though therapeutic administration of IFNα has been associated with induction of depression, a common manifestation in NPSLE patients. Our aim was to investigate whether disrupting the type I IFN pathway systemically would attenuate the development of murine neuropsychiatric lupus.

Methods: Female MRL/lpr mice were administered an anti-IFNAR antibody (MAR1-5A3; MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD) or an IgG isotype control antibody (1A7, IgG1) intraperitoneally 3 times weekly for 12 weeks starting at 4-5 weeks of age. Depression-like behavior was assessed at 8-9 weeks of age using the Porsolt swim test. Cognitive dysfunction was assessed at the end of treatment at 16-17 weeks of age, using the object placement (OP) and object recognition (OR) tests, which evaluates spatial and recognition memory, respectively. Brain tissue was analyzed by histology and by immunofluorescent staining for B220+ and CD3+ cells, as well as albumin and IgG deposition in the brain parenchyma to determine brain barrier integrity.

Results: No significant differences were seen between the anti-IFNAR and control treated mice when assessing for depression-like behavior (p=0.32) or cognitive dysfunction (OP: x2(1) = 0.54, p = 0.46; OR: x2(1) = 0.002, p = 0.96). Anti-IFNAR treatment also did not significantly improve cellular infiltration, as evident by hematoxylin and eosin staining and infiltrate composition comparing B220+ and CD3+ cell counts. Staining for albumin and IgG leakage in the brain parenchyma also showed similar brain barrier integrity between the groups. RNA expression level of CXCL10, a known interferon-stimulated gene, were significantly different in the spleen (p = 0.023) and the choroid plexus (p = 0.0088), suggesting that the pathway was inhibited in the choroid plexus with systemic delivery of the antibody.

Conclusion: Surprisingly, our results showed no improvement in neuropsychiatric disease in the MRL/lpr mouse model and suggest that the role of IFNAR signaling in the pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric lupus continues to need to be carefully assessed.


Disclosure: M. Huang, None; A. Stock, None; E. Mike, None; R. Kolbeck, MedImmune, 3, 6; C. Putterman, Equillium, 5, Equillium, Inc, 2, 5, Exagen, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Huang M, Stock A, Mike E, Kolbeck R, Putterman C. Anti-IFNAR Treatment Does Not Reverse Neuropsychiatric Disease in MRL/lpr Lupus Mice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anti-ifnar-treatment-does-not-reverse-neuropsychiatric-disease-in-mrl-lpr-lupus-mice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anti-ifnar-treatment-does-not-reverse-neuropsychiatric-disease-in-mrl-lpr-lupus-mice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology