ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 491

Anti-Citrullinated Peptide Antibodies Testing Rate over Time in Newly Diagnosed RA Patients – Data from Three Administrative Claims Databases (2007–2014)

E Alemao, Z Guo and L Burns, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA), laboratory tests and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Rheumatoid Factor

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster I: Clinical Characteristics/Presentation/Prognosis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Current clinical guidelines recommend testing for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) at the time of RA diagnosis.1 However, there is a lack of information about the frequency of ACPA testing at RA diagnosis or thereafter. The aim of this study was to describe the frequency of ACPA testing over time and to investigate the potential differences in demographics, co-morbidities and hospitalizations between patients (pts) who received ACPA tests versus those who did not.

Methods: Data from the three following US commercial healthcare claims databases (db) were analyzed: IMS PharMetrics Plus (db A), Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (db B) and Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Medicare (db C). Pts with two diagnosis codes for RA from January 1 2007 to December 31 2014, treatment with a DMARD, and continuous enrolment for at least 12 mths before and 6 mths after the index date were included. ACPA and RF testing claims identified by current procedural terminology codes were included in the analysis. ACPA testing rates were evaluated as number of pts with tests divided by total number of pts with and without tests. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate baseline covariates associated with single ACPA test before the index date, single ACPA test after the index date and multiple ACPA tests.

Results: 67,674 newly diagnosed RA pts in db A (age 18–64 yrs), 14,767 in db B (age 18–64 yrs) and 10,225 in db C (age ≥65 yrs) met the study inclusion criteria. The overall ACPA testing rate (95% CI) was 70.6% (70.3, 70.9) in db A, 72.2% (71.5, 72.9) in db B and 63.5% (62.5, 64.4) in db C. The ACPA testing rates increased from 2007 to 2014 for all three db (Figure). The corresponding RF testing rates were 75.4% (75.1, 75.7), 85.1% (84.5, 85.6) and 77.8% (77.0, 78.6), respectively. Pts tested and not tested had similar characteristics, with a standardized difference of >0.10 in only a few co-morbidities. The odds ratio (OR) for pre-diagnosis testing for each year increase from 2007 to 2014 was 1.26 (95% CI: 1.25, 1.28) in db A, 1.19 (1.17, 1.22) in db B and 1.27 (1.23, 1.31) in db C. Women were more likely to have multiple tests in db A (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.21) and in db B (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.45), but not in db C (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.08). Pts who received ACPA tests, vs those who did not, had a lower rate of 1-yr hospitalization; the hazard ratio (95% CI) after adjustment for covariates was 0.76 (0.71, 0.80) in db A, 0.86 (0.75, 0.98) in db B and 0.76 (0.68, 0.85) in db C.

Conclusion: The ACPA testing rate, especially pre-diagnosis testing, increased significantly from 2007 to 2014. Women aged 18–64 yrs were more likely to have multiple tests. A slightly lower rate was seen in RA pts ≥65 yrs old.2

1.    Aletaha D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1580–8.

2.    Original abstract © EULAR/BMJ. First presented at EULAR 2016 and published in Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75 (Suppl 2):1020. Any reprints, promotional options, education material etc have to be done through the original source (ARD/BMJ).



Disclosure: E. Alemao, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; Z. Guo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; L. Burns, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Alemao E, Guo Z, Burns L. Anti-Citrullinated Peptide Antibodies Testing Rate over Time in Newly Diagnosed RA Patients – Data from Three Administrative Claims Databases (2007–2014) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anti-citrullinated-peptide-antibodies-testing-rate-over-time-in-newly-diagnosed-ra-patients-data-from-three-administrative-claims-databases-2007-2014/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anti-citrullinated-peptide-antibodies-testing-rate-over-time-in-newly-diagnosed-ra-patients-data-from-three-administrative-claims-databases-2007-2014/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology