ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1923

Angiographic Progression of Disease in Large-Vessel Vasculitis

Kaitlin Quinn1, Himanshu Dashora2, Mark Ahlman3, Elaine Novakovich2 and Peter C. Grayson2, 1Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Washington, DC, 2Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Bethesda, MD, 3National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Bethesda, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, Imaging, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Takayasu.s arteritis, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Angiography is essential to detect vascular disease in patients with large-vessel vasculitis (LVV).  Guidelines differ on the role of periodic angiography to monitor patients with LVV, in part due to limited prospective data regarding the natural history of angiographic disease.  The objective of this study was to characterize angiographic progression of disease over time in Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Methods: Patients with GCA or TAK were recruited into a prospective, observational cohort.  All patients underwent baseline magnetic resonance (MR) or computed tomography (CT) angiography and a follow-up study (same modality) at least one year after baseline per a standardized imaging protocol.  Angiographic lesions, defined as stenosis, occlusion, or aneurysm, were evaluated by visual inspection in 4 segments of the aorta and 13 branch arteries by a single reader blinded to clinical status.  On follow up angiography, the development of new lesions was recorded and existing lesions were characterized as improved, worsened, or unchanged.  Change over time was evaluated at the patient level and within each individual arterial territory.

Results: 1162 arterial territories were evaluated from 70 patients with LVV (TAK=38; GCA=32).  Baseline characteristics were as follows: Age [TAK=29.5 years (18.4-39.5), GCA=69.6 years (60.7-75.5)], Female gender [TAK=30 patients (79%), GCA=23 patients (72%)], Disease duration [TAK=2.2 years (0.6-5.5), GCA=0.7 years (0.1-2.6)], Active clinical disease [TAK=17 patients (45%), GCA=20 patients (63%)].  The median time from initial study to follow up study was 1.6 years (1.0-2.7).

At the patient level, there were 12 new arterial territories that developed in 9 (13%) patients and occurred more frequently in patients with TAK=8 than GCA=1; p=0.03.  Sixty patients (86%) had ≥1 territory affected at baseline (TAK=33, GCA=27).  Angiographic lesions improved in 17 (28.3%) patients, with greater frequency in TAK=13 than GCA=4; p=0.05.  Lesions worsened in 6 (10%) patients with no differences between diseases (TAK=4, GCA=2).  In 7 (11.7%) patients (TAK=6, GCA=1), specific arterial territories improved while other territories worsened over follow up within the same patient.

At the arterial territory level, 248 territories were affected at the baseline visit (TAK=145 territories, GCA=103 territories).  At follow up, existing arterial lesions improved in 30 (12.1%) territories, worsened in 7 (2.8%) territories, and stayed the same in 211 (85.1%) territories.  There were no significant differences in angiographic progression of disease at the territory level between GCA and TAK.  Change in the branch arteries was more dynamic than change in the aorta (Figure).

Conclusion: Dynamic change in arterial lesions is observed in patients with TAK and GCA.  Development of new angiographic lesions is infrequent and occurs more often in patients with TAK.  Arterial lesions do not necessarily represent permanent damage, as a substantial number of lesions can improve.  Discordant areas of improvement and worsening can occur within the same patient. These data may inform guideline recommendations for imaging monitoring in LVV. 


Disclosure: K. Quinn, None; H. Dashora, None; M. Ahlman, None; E. Novakovich, None; P. Grayson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Quinn K, Dashora H, Ahlman M, Novakovich E, Grayson P. Angiographic Progression of Disease in Large-Vessel Vasculitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/angiographic-progression-of-disease-in-large-vessel-vasculitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/angiographic-progression-of-disease-in-large-vessel-vasculitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology