ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1699

Anakinra in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

Hubert de Boysson1, Kim Ly2, Loik Geffray3, Thomas Quemeneur4, Eric Liozon5, Holy Bezanahary5, Noemie Le Gouellec4, Alexandra Audemard6, Samuel Deshayes7, Jonathan Boutemy8, Gwénola Maigné8, Nicolas Martin Silva8, Jean-Jacques Parienti8 and Achille Aouba7, 1Caen university Hospital, Caen, France, 2CHU Limoges, limo, France, 3CH Lisieux, Lisieux, France, 4CH Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France, 5CHU Limoges, Limoges, France, 6Tours, Tours, France, 7Service d'immunologie clinique-médecine interne, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France, 8CHU Caen, Caen, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, Outcome measures, Therapy, alternative

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Abstracts: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders I: Clinical Trials

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:00PM-2:30PM

Background/Purpose: A previous retrospective series reported the efficacy and tolerance of anakinra (ANK) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and called for further validation in a prospective study.

Methods: This phase 3 study (NCT02902731) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial over a 52-week period. Patients with a GCA diagnosis based on histology or large-vessel imaging were eligible. At inclusion, patients were randomized 1:1. From inclusion to week 16 (W16), patients in the anakinra (ANK) group received a daily 100mg injection of subcutaneous anakinra while patients in the placebo (PBO) group received a daily injection of placebo. In both arms, GC protocol was similar. Each patient started 0.7 mg/kg of prednisone equivalent and followed a protocolized tapering schedule until discontinuation at week 52. Endpoints included the relapse rate at W16, W26, W52, and the completion of the GC tapering. After determining the sample size, we aimed to include 70 patients, 35 in each arm. Given the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the study was prematurely stopped after 30 patients were included. We herein present the results of the intent-to-treat population of 30 patients.

Results: From 5 centers, 30 patients were randomized as follows: 17 in the ANK group and 13 in the PBO group. Their characteristics at baseline were not different (Table 1). Of the 30 patients, 26 completed the W52 protocol visit. Among the 4 other patients, one in the ANK group was lost to follow-up at W42 and did not experience any relapse, two (one in each group) left the study protocol at W20 after experiencing relapses, and one in the ANK group stopped the study at W16 after he experienced two relapses.

Among the 17 patients who received ANK, one patient stopped the treatment at W12 after he experienced serious adverse events (AEs). He did not relapse before discontinuation.

At W26, 12 (40%) patients had relapsed, 8 (47%) in the ANK group and 4 (31%) in the PBO group (p=0.47). No ischemic complication had occurred at the time of relapse. At W26, a deviation from the protocolized GC tapering was observed in 13 (43%) patients, 7 (41%) in the ANK group and 6 (46%) in the PBO group (p=1). At W52, a total of 15 (50%) patients had relapsed, 9 (53%) in the ANK group and 6 (46%) in the PBO group (p=1). The relapse-free survival is shown in Figure 1. Seven of the 9 relapsing patients who received ANK experienced a disease flare after ANK discontinuation. At W52, 2 patients in each group had discontinued GC (p=0.87). Seven serious AEs were reported in five patients, including 4 occurring under ANK. Infections were observed in 59% of patients who received ANK and 62% receiving PBO (p=1).

Conclusion: Although it was prematurely discontinued, this prospective study does not support anakinra as a treatment to reduce the risk of relapse in GCA or reduce GC exposure.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Characteristics at baseline of GCA patients who received anakinra or placebo

Supporting image 2

Relapse-free survival of GCA patients receiving anakinra or placebo.


Disclosures: H. de Boysson: None; K. Ly: None; L. Geffray: None; T. Quemeneur: None; E. Liozon: None; H. Bezanahary: None; N. Le Gouellec: None; A. Audemard: None; S. Deshayes: None; J. Boutemy: None; G. Maigné: None; N. Martin Silva: None; J. Parienti: None; A. Aouba: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

de Boysson H, Ly K, Geffray L, Quemeneur T, Liozon E, Bezanahary H, Le Gouellec N, Audemard A, Deshayes S, Boutemy J, Maigné G, Martin Silva N, Parienti J, Aouba A. Anakinra in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anakinra-in-giant-cell-arteritis-a-multicenter-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anakinra-in-giant-cell-arteritis-a-multicenter-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology