ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1680

an Indirect Comparisons Analysis of Medications Used for Treatment of Raynaud’s Phenomenon

Sampath Manickam1, Elie Donath2, Sandeep Dayanand3 and Jonathan Greer4, 1University of Miami Palm Beach Internal Medicine, West Palm Beach, FL, 2Internal Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Palm Beach Regional Campus, Atlantis, FL, 3University of Miami Palm Beach Internal medicine, West palm beach, FL, 4Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, Boynton Beach, FL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Calcium, meta-analysis and treatment, Raynaud's phenomenon

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics: Systemic Sclerosis, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

An Indirect Comparisons Analysis of Medications used for treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon

Background/Purpose: There are several pharmacological treatments used for treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon: calcium channel blockers, endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 enzyme inhibitors. The treatments have shown varying efficacy for relieving the symptoms of raynaud’s phenomenon. One of the main determinants of the medications used for treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon is cost. The objective of this research is to perform a comparison of several pharmacological treatments for raynaud’s phenomenon. The medications that were analyzed were: Bosentan, Vardenafil, Tadalifil, Sildenafil, Udenafil, MQX-503 (a topical nitro formulation), Amlodipine. The main outcomes that were analyzed were Raynaud phenomenon attack frequency (number of attacks per day) and Raynaud condition score (a scale of 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms).

Methods: Studies were extracted from a computerized literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE of all relevant RCT’s. 8 RCT’s, including 491 patients, were identified. There were two outcomes of interest: Raynaud phenomenon attack frequency (number of attacks per day) and Raynaud condition score. There were several outcomes of interest for safety: headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness. Studies were included if they provided data at 10 weeks. For each outcome, a fixed-effects meta-analysis was employed to compare each drug to placebo. A mixed-treatment comparisons analysis was then utilized to compare each of these drugs to one another indirectly. Calculation of the probability that each treatment is best was implemented using the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method.

Results: In terms of Raynaud phenomenon attack frequency at 10 weeks, patients taking Vardenafil only had a 0.01 reduced attack frequency when compared to Amlodipine. In terms of Raynaud phenomenon attack frequency at 10 weeks, patients taking MQX-503 only had a 0.44 reduced attack frequency both were compared to Amlodipine. In terms of Raynaud condition score at 10 weeks, patients taking Vardenafil had a reduced 0.13 reduced Raynaud condition score when compared to Amlodipine (95% CI -2.55 to 2.77). In terms of rank probability, Tadalifil had a 44% chance of being the option most likely to be associated with the lowest Raynaud condition score at 10 weeks. The degree of incoherence (measuring how closely the network fits together) was low for all outcomes.

Conclusion: There are many parameters that determine the selection of a medication in the treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon such as cost, side effects and tolerability. Our analysis attempts to compare various medications for Raynaud’s phenomenon in a network meta-analysis. The goal was to compare Raynaud phenomenon attack frequency and Raynaud Condition score.  Based on the above statistical analysis, Vardenafil and Tadalifil may be considered to be superior options to other medications for reducing Raynaud phenomenon attack frequency and Raynaud condition score at 10 weeks.


Disclosure:

S. Manickam,
None;

E. Donath,
None;

S. Dayanand,
None;

J. Greer,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/an-indirect-comparisons-analysis-of-medications-used-for-treatment-of-raynauds-phenomenon/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology