ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1189

Allopurinol Dose Titration and Efficacy: A Large-Scale, 6-Month, Multicenter, Prospective Study

Scott Baumgartner1, Hyon Choi2,3, Nicola Dalbeth4, David Fitz-Patrick5, Matt Cravets6 and Chris Storgard7, 1Ardea Biosciences, San Diego, CA, 2Section of Rheumatology and the Clinical Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand, 5East-West Medical Research Institute, Honolulu, HI, 6Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, 74939 Directors Place, Ardea Bioscience, San Diego, CA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout, rheumatologic practice, treatment and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Allopurinol is the first-line urate-lowering therapy (ULT) for most people with gout, but target serum uric acid (sUA) levels of <6.0 mg/dL (recommended by current ACR guidelines) are often not achieved with doses up to 300 mg/day. Data on allopurinol dose titration and its efficacy are limited. The aim of this international, multicenter, prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of allopurinol dose titration in a real-world setting (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01391325).

Methods: Adult patients meeting ARA criteria for the Classification of Acute Arthritis of Primary Gout and at least 2 gout flares in the preceding year were enrolled in this 6-month study. Patients who had received ULT other than allopurinol before the trial underwent a 7-day washout period before initiating or re-initiating allopurinol therapy, which was prescribed according to approved product labels and/or institutional standards of care. The study protocol encouraged upward titration of the allopurinol dose to an optimal, medically appropriate dose as determined by the investigator. The main efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a sUA level of <6.0 mg/dL at the end of the study.

Results: Dosing and sUA Levels

Table 1. Final Allopurinol Dose by Baseline Dose

Baseline Dose (mg/day)

Final Allopurinol Dose (mg/day)

≤100

>100-200

>200-300

>300-400

>400-500

>500-600

>600

≤100 (n=591)

40 (6.8)

90 (15.2)

361 (61.1)

76 (12.9)

11 (1.9)

12 (2.0)

1 (0.2)

>100-200 (n=395)

5 (1.3)

129 (32.7)

209 (52.9)

31 (7.8)

14 (3.5)

5 (1.3)

2 (0.5)

>200-300 (n=662)

1 (0.2)

8 (1.2)

557 (84.1)

55 (8.3)

19 (2.9)

14 (2.1)

8 (1.2)

>300-400 (n=62)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (3.2)

34 (54.8)

17 (27.4)

7 (11.3)

2 (3.2)

>400-500 (n=11)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (9.1)

8 (72.7)

0 (0.0)

2 (18.2)

>500-600 (n=8)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (25.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

5 (62.5)

1 (12.5)

>600 (n=3)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

3 (100)

Shading: percentage of patients in same dose category at last visit as at baseline. Those above the diagonal were at a higher dose level and those below the diagonal were at a lower dose level.

Table 2. Levels of sUA by Final Daily Allopurinol Dose

sUA Response Categories

(mg/dL)

Final Allopurinol Dose (mg/day)

 

≤100

(n=46)

>100-200

(n=227)

>200-300

(n=1131)

>300-400

(n=197)

>400-500

(n=69)

>500-600

(n=43)

>600

(n=19)

Total

(N=1732)

<6.0

6 (13.0)

77 (33.9)

485 (42.9)

111 (56.3)

40 (58.0)

19 (44.2)

6 (31.6)

744 (43.0)

<5.0

1 (2.2)

23 (10.1)

152 (13.4)

44 (22.3)

16 (23.2)

11 (25.6)

3 (15.8)

250 (14.4)

<4.0

0 (0.0)

2 (0.9)

27 (2.4)

8 (4.1)

3 (4.3)

6 (14.0)

1 (5.3)

47 (2.7)

<3.0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (0.2)

0 (0.0)

1 (1.4)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

3 (0.2)

As shown, 54.1% (937 patients) finished on a higher dose than at baseline, but only 15.8% of patients exceeded 300 mg/day (Table 1). Another 44.8% finished at the same dose as baseline. At the time of the last dose, only 43.0% of all patients had achieved target sUA levels <6.0 mg/dL (Table 2). Even at doses above 300 mg/day, approximately 46% did not reach target sUA levels of <6.0 mg/dL.

 

Conclusion: In this large, multinational, prospective observational study of gout, optimal allopurinol dose escalation occurred infrequently. Fewer than 50% of patients overall achieved target sUA level <6.0 mg/dL and the majority of those with a baseline dose ≥300 mg/day did not increase their dose. These data, consistent with published literature, likely reflect real-world circumstances in which a significant proportion of patients fail to reach sUA targets with allopurinol therapy as currently used.


Disclosure:

S. Baumgartner,

Stock options AstraZeneca,

1,

Full time employment Ardea Biosciences, a wholly owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca,

3;

H. Choi,

Savient, Takeda,

2,

Takeda, AstraZeneca,

5;

N. Dalbeth,

Ardea/AstraZeneca,

5;

D. Fitz-Patrick,

Ardea Biosciences,

2;

M. Cravets,

Full time employee of Ardea Biosciences, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca PLC,

3;

C. Storgard,

AstraZeneca,

1,

Ardea Biosciences, a wholly owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/allopurinol-dose-titration-and-efficacy-a-large-scale-6-month-multicenter-prospective-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology