ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Abstract Number: 733

Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in Lupus Nephritis: Factors Leading to Progression

Konstantinos Tselios, Dafna D Gladman, Jiandong Su and Murray Urowitz, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Keywords: Nephritis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster I: Clinical Manifestations and Comorbidity

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) carries an increased risk for progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal replacement therapy. However, the rate of progression and the predictors that drive the decline of renal function in lupus nephritis (LN) are not known. The aim of the present study is to define such factors in patients with LN and advanced CKD.

Methods: Patients with advanced LN-related CKD for two consecutive clinic visits were retrieved from our long-term longitudinal lupus cohort. Advanced CKD was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes as CKD stage 3b (eGFR=30-44ml/min/1.73m2) and stage 4 (eGFR=15-29ml/min/1.73m2), while ESRD was defined as eGFR<15ml/min/1.73m2 or initiation of dialysis. All individuals were followed until the progression to ESRD or the last visit and were divided into two groups (“progressors” and “non-progressors”). Demographic, clinical, immunological and therapeutic variables were compared at baseline (the second visit of advanced CKD). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed for the identification of predictors for transition to ESRD. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.4; p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results: One hundred eighteen patients (74 with CKD 3b and 44 with CKD 4) were included. Mean time from LN to advanced CKD was 5.6 years. There were no differences between groups at baseline, concerning demographic, clinical and immunological variables. Patients with CKD 4 more often had a proliferative LN (class III or IV) (50% vs. 29.7%, p=0.053). Rates of and time to progression are shown in Table 1.

 

Table 1. Rates and time to progression for all patients

Variable

CKD 3b (n=74)

CKD 4 (n=44)

Age at CKD

44.7±13.4

40.8±13.6

Progression to ESRD (%, n)

5.4% (4)

56.8% (25)

Time to ESRD (y, median)

4.5

3.1

Progression to CKD 4 (%, n)

21.6% (16)

Not applicable

Time to progression to CKD 4 (y, median)

4.8

Not applicable

Patients who did not progress (n=73, 61.9%) had a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (range 0-26.7). Their eGFR remained unaltered (from a median of 38.6 at baseline to 37.1ml/min/1.73m2 at the last visit). Multivariable analysis for predictors of progression to ESRD is shown in Table 2.

 

Table 2. Predictors for transition to ESRD from CKD stages 3b and 4

 

HR

Lower 95%CI

Higher 95%CI

p

Anti-dsDNA (+) at baseline

5.28

1.91

14.57

0.001

Glucocorticosteroids at baseline

4.17

1.01

17.15

0.048

Cumulative GCS dose (from LN to CKD)

1.01

1.00

1.02

0.04

Treated with IS (MMF or AZA) at baseline

0.21

0.07

0.60

0.004

CKD 4 (compared to CKD 3b)

27.5

2.9

96.3

<0.0001

GCS: glucocorticosteroids, IS: immunosuppressives, MMF: mycophenolate mofetil, AZA: azathioprine

Conclusion: Only 24.6% of our patients developed ESRD, while another 21.6% of the CKD 3b patients progressed to CKD 4. Risk factors for ESRD included abnormal anti-dsDNA antibodies at the time of CKD as well as treatment with glucocorticosteroids and higher cumulative dose (for the treatment of LN). Immunosuppressive treatment at the time of CKD was protective. Renal function remained stable in approximately 73% of the CKD 3b and 43% of the CKD 4 patients over 6 years of follow-up.

 


Disclosure: K. Tselios, None; D. D. Gladman, Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 5,Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, 2; J. Su, None; M. Urowitz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tselios K, Gladman DD, Su J, Urowitz M. Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in Lupus Nephritis: Factors Leading to Progression [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/advanced-chronic-kidney-disease-in-lupus-nephritis-factors-leading-to-progression/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/advanced-chronic-kidney-disease-in-lupus-nephritis-factors-leading-to-progression/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology