ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
    • 2017-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • Meeting Resource Center

Abstract Number: 733

Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in Lupus Nephritis: Factors Leading to Progression

Konstantinos Tselios, Dafna D Gladman, Jiandong Su and Murray Urowitz, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Nephritis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Session Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster I: Clinical Manifestations and Comorbidity

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) carries an increased risk for progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal replacement therapy. However, the rate of progression and the predictors that drive the decline of renal function in lupus nephritis (LN) are not known. The aim of the present study is to define such factors in patients with LN and advanced CKD.

Methods: Patients with advanced LN-related CKD for two consecutive clinic visits were retrieved from our long-term longitudinal lupus cohort. Advanced CKD was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes as CKD stage 3b (eGFR=30-44ml/min/1.73m2) and stage 4 (eGFR=15-29ml/min/1.73m2), while ESRD was defined as eGFR<15ml/min/1.73m2 or initiation of dialysis. All individuals were followed until the progression to ESRD or the last visit and were divided into two groups (“progressors” and “non-progressors”). Demographic, clinical, immunological and therapeutic variables were compared at baseline (the second visit of advanced CKD). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed for the identification of predictors for transition to ESRD. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.4; p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results: One hundred eighteen patients (74 with CKD 3b and 44 with CKD 4) were included. Mean time from LN to advanced CKD was 5.6 years. There were no differences between groups at baseline, concerning demographic, clinical and immunological variables. Patients with CKD 4 more often had a proliferative LN (class III or IV) (50% vs. 29.7%, p=0.053). Rates of and time to progression are shown in Table 1.

 

Table 1. Rates and time to progression for all patients

Variable

CKD 3b (n=74)

CKD 4 (n=44)

Age at CKD

44.7±13.4

40.8±13.6

Progression to ESRD (%, n)

5.4% (4)

56.8% (25)

Time to ESRD (y, median)

4.5

3.1

Progression to CKD 4 (%, n)

21.6% (16)

Not applicable

Time to progression to CKD 4 (y, median)

4.8

Not applicable

Patients who did not progress (n=73, 61.9%) had a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (range 0-26.7). Their eGFR remained unaltered (from a median of 38.6 at baseline to 37.1ml/min/1.73m2 at the last visit). Multivariable analysis for predictors of progression to ESRD is shown in Table 2.

 

Table 2. Predictors for transition to ESRD from CKD stages 3b and 4

 

HR

Lower 95%CI

Higher 95%CI

p

Anti-dsDNA (+) at baseline

5.28

1.91

14.57

0.001

Glucocorticosteroids at baseline

4.17

1.01

17.15

0.048

Cumulative GCS dose (from LN to CKD)

1.01

1.00

1.02

0.04

Treated with IS (MMF or AZA) at baseline

0.21

0.07

0.60

0.004

CKD 4 (compared to CKD 3b)

27.5

2.9

96.3

<0.0001

GCS: glucocorticosteroids, IS: immunosuppressives, MMF: mycophenolate mofetil, AZA: azathioprine

Conclusion: Only 24.6% of our patients developed ESRD, while another 21.6% of the CKD 3b patients progressed to CKD 4. Risk factors for ESRD included abnormal anti-dsDNA antibodies at the time of CKD as well as treatment with glucocorticosteroids and higher cumulative dose (for the treatment of LN). Immunosuppressive treatment at the time of CKD was protective. Renal function remained stable in approximately 73% of the CKD 3b and 43% of the CKD 4 patients over 6 years of follow-up.

 


Disclosure: K. Tselios, None; D. D. Gladman, Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 5,Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, 2; J. Su, None; M. Urowitz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tselios K, Gladman DD, Su J, Urowitz M. Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in Lupus Nephritis: Factors Leading to Progression [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/advanced-chronic-kidney-disease-in-lupus-nephritis-factors-leading-to-progression/. Accessed March 23, 2023.
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/advanced-chronic-kidney-disease-in-lupus-nephritis-factors-leading-to-progression/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

ACR Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium 2020

© COPYRIGHT 2023 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Wiley

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
  • Advanced Search
  • Meeting Resource Center
  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences