ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 324

Adherence to Guideline Directed Management of Gout Among VA Providers

Kelly Corbitt 1, Isis Lopez2 and David Dillon 3, 1University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, 2University of Miami/ Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, 3University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: allopurinol and primary care, gout, quality improvement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Measures Of Healthcare Quality Poster I: Testing, Screening, & Treating

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis, affecting about 4% of the adult population in the United States. Management is often costly, with estimates around one billion dollars in yearly spending. The American College of Rheumatology recommends serum uric acid level (sUA) less than 6 mg/dL for the appropriate management of gout and prevention of recurrences. Despite the gout-related burden on the general patient population and its impact on the health-care system, guideline-directed management of patients with gout remains inconsistent among general practitioners. The degree to which general practitioners at the Miami VA adhere to guideline-directed management of veterans with gout is unknown – understanding discrepancies in care of veterans with gout can allow us to formulate and implement quality improvement projects to address these deficiencies and standardize care.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of veterans seen at the Miami VA primary care outpatient clinics was performed by searching ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes (274 and M10, respectively) between the years of 2017 to 2018. Patients not seen by a general practitioner within the last year were excluded. The dose of uric acid lowering drugs, as well the value and date of the last serum uric acid level were recorded. Descriptive analysis of these data points was conducted.

Results:

We identified 398 veterans with an ICD-9 or 10  diagnosis of gout managed by primary care providers, out of which 186 veterans were prescribed allopurinol. Of the 186 veterans prescribed allopurinol, 96 veterans were on 100 mg daily dosing, 88 veterans on 300 mg daily dosing, and 2 veterans on 400 mg daily dosing. The average sUA of veterans on the 100 mg dosing was 7.24 mg/dL, the average sUA level on the 300 mg dosing was 6.64 mg/dL, and the average sUA on the 400 mg dosing was 6.75 mg/dL.

Among the 398 veterans with a diagnosis of gout, 171 of them had sUA checked in the past year, with an average sUA value of 6.94 mg/dL, irrespective if they were on allopurinol therapy. Of the 186 patients on allopurinol, 36% (67 patients) had no sUA level obtained over a one-year span to assess uric acid lowering response. 

Conclusion: Our results reveal that adherence to guideline-directed management of veterans with gout is lacking. We found that a large number of veterans with gout did not have a follow-up sUA level over a one-year span, while among veterans whose sUA levels were recorded, the average sUA level failed to meet the guideline-accepted sUA level of less than 6 mg/dL, irrespective of allopurinol dosage. In an effort to improve standardization of care for the management of gout among our patients, several quality improvement measures were developed. First, an electronic alert in the VA electronic medical record was created to prompt primary care providers to order a repeat sUA when attempting to place a refill for urate lowering medications if this was not ordered within the year. The goal for sUA level is also displayed via the alert system. An order set has also been developed to assist providers in initiating uric acid lowering agents that includes sUA checks at appropriate intervals. We hope that implementation of these quality improvement measures will lead to improved management of veterans with gout.

Image 1: Order check prompting primary care provider to order uric acid level

Figure 2: Order set for initiating uric acid lowering therapy for primary care providers


Disclosure: K. Corbitt, None; I. Lopez, None; D. Dillon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Corbitt K, Lopez I, Dillon D. Adherence to Guideline Directed Management of Gout Among VA Providers [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adherence-to-guideline-directed-management-of-gout-among-va-providers/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adherence-to-guideline-directed-management-of-gout-among-va-providers/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology