ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1185

Acupotomy Therapy for Joint Pain Relief of Knee Osteoarthritis-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jia Li1, Puwei Yuan2, Rongqiang Zhang1, Bin Chen3, Bo Dong1, Wulin Kang1, Xiaoliang Zhang3, Stephanie Hyon4, Raveendhara R. Bannuru5, William F. Harvey4 and Chenchen Wang4, 1Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China, 2Traditional Chinese Medicine College, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China, 3Integrative TCM and Western Medicine College, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China, 4Rheumatology, Center of Integrative Medicine and Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, Boston, MA, 5Center of Integrative Medicine and Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: meta-analysis and pain, OA

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Clinical Trials and Interventions

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a major public health problem and a leading cause of long-term pain and disability. Few effective medical treatments for the disease currently exist. Acupotomy has been used as a new type of minimally-invasive surgical treatment for KOA pain. It combines techniques from acupuncture and micro-surgery that separates subcutaneous adhesions and muscle knots, resulting in immediate pain relief. A comprehensive literature review is an important step in understanding its benefits and for guiding treatment for KOA pain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of acupotomy for joint pain associated with KOA.

Methods: We performed a search on Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, 3 universal Chinese databases (CNKI, Wan Fang and VIP), and reference lists of published articles through June 2017. We include randomized controlled trials using acupotomy therapy for KOA patients who met the ACR diagnostic criteria. The effect of acupotomy on joint pain relief was measured with WOMAC pain subscale, VAS and other pain scores. Study quality was evaluated with Jadad criteria. The differences between treatment groups were reported as mean change (P-value).

Results: After screening 721 abstracts, 16 studies met eligibility criteria and were conducted between 2007 and 2015. A total of 1,416 KOA patients (65.2% female, mean age = 59 years, mean symptom duration = 87 months) were included. Table 1 summarizes the trials evaluating the effect of acupotomy therapy on joint pain relief. The typical treatment was once a week, for 1-5 weeks until pain relief. Additional massage therapy after acupotomy was included in four studies. Nine studies used acupuncture (1 traditional acupuncture and 9 electroacupuncture) as controls and others used therapeutic massage, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics, or intra-articular hyaluronate injection. The overall quality of trials was modest (mean Jadad score=3). Almost all studies reported an effect of acupotomy on joint pain compared to a variety of controls. Figure 1 shows a meta-analysis comparing effects of acupotomy therapy with acupuncture controls on pain relief. A meta-analysis comparing acupotomy with other controls is not reported due to variation in outcomes assessed. Adverse events were not reported.

Conclusion: Acupotomy treatment may improve joint pain associated with KOA. Further rigorously designed and well-controlled RCTs with long-term follow-up are warranted.


Table 1. Sixteen RCTs of Acupotomy Therapy on Knee Osteoarthritis

Author

Year

N a (Age)b

Acupotomy therapy

Controls

Duration

(weeks)

Pain Mean Differencec

(P-value)

Zeng

2007

24 (63y)

Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk; 1-3times until pain relieves)

Acupuncture therapy

(30min,3times/1wk, 3wks)

3

VASd score: *2.05

(P<0.05)

Peng

2008

32 (60y)

Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk; 1-3times until pain relieves)

Acupuncture therapy

(30min,3times/1wk, 3wks)

3

VAS score: *0.43

(P<0.05)

Guo

2009

60 (ND)

Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk; 1-3times until pain relieves)

Acupuncture therapy

(30min,3times/1wk, 3wks)

3

Pain score of JOAe;

Walking: ^3.00

(P<0.05)

Stair activity: ^3.80

(P<0.05)

VAS score: *0.97

(P<0.05)

Zeng

2009

46 (ND)

Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk; 1-3times until pain relieves)

Acupuncture therapy

(30min,3times/1wk, 3wks)

3

VAS score: *1.68

(P<0.01)

Pain score of JOA:

Walking: ^5.47

(P<0.01)

Stair activity: ^2.35

(P<0.05)

Guo

2010

180 (60y)

 

Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk; 1-3times until pain relieves)

Acupuncture therapy

(30min,3times/1wk, 3wks)

3

VAS score: *0.3

(P>0.05)

Follow-up after a half year of treatment: *0.53

(P<0.05)

Li

2011

76 (53y)

 

1.Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk, 3times)

2.Massage therapy to improve joint movement

(after acupotomy)

Acupuncture therapy

(30min,5times/1wk, 3wks)

3

Pain score by HSSf: ^0.9

(P<0.05)

Zhang

2011

58 (53y)

 

Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk; 1-3times until pain relieves)

Acupuncture therapy

(30min,3times/1wk, 3wks)

3

Pain scoreg by JOA: ^10.89

(P<0.05)

Guo

2012

180 (60y)

 

Release tissue under points of pain

(once/wk, 3times)

 

Acupuncture therapy

(30min,3times/1wk, 3wks)

3

Pain score of JOA:

Walking: ^4.02

(P<0.01)

Stair activity: ^3.5

(P<0.01)

Xiong

2014

80 (62y)

 

Release tissue under points of pain

(once/wk, 4times)

Acupuncture therapy

(once/day, 6 days)

4

VAS score: *0.23

(P<0.05)

Wang

2009

60 (49y)

 

Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk; 1-3times until pain relieves)

Sodium hyaluronate injection
(1¡Á2ml/1 wk, 5wks)

5

Pain score of WOMACh: *3.23

(P<0.01)

Zhu

2011

80 (62y)

1.Release soft tissue adhesion by the method named ¡±5 fingers¡±

(once/6days,3times)

2. Massage therapy to improve joint movement

(after acupotomy)

Sodium hyaluronate injection

(1¡Á2ml/6days, 3wks)

3

Pain score by HSS: ^3.38

(P<0.05)

Zheng

2015

80 (61y)

 

Release tissue under points of pain

(once/wk, 5times)

Sodium hyaluronate injection

(1¡Á2ml/1 wk, 5 wks)

5

VAS score: *0.77

(P<0.05)

Zhou

2015

100 (58y)

 

Release tissue under points of pain

(once/wk, 5times)

 

Sodium hyaluronate injection

(1¡Á2ml/1 wk, 5 wks)

5

VAS score: ^0.1

(P>0.05)

Follow-up after a half year of treatment: *3.03

(P<0.05)

Ding

2014

200 (58y)

 

1.Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk, 4times)

2.Massage therapy to improve joint movement

(after acupotomy)

Diclofenac sodium

(75mg/d, 2wks, oral pill)

4

VAS score: *0.13

(P>0.05)

Follow-up after a half year of treatment: *2.63

(P<0.05)

Yao

2010

 

100 (61y)

 

1.Release tissue under points of pain

(once/wk, 3times);

2.Massage therapy to improve joint movement

(after acupotomy)

Diclofenac sodium

(25mg/time,3times/d, 15days, oral pill)

3

Pain score by JOA

Walking: ^4.98

(P<0.05)

Stair activity: ^4.82

(P<0.01)

Huang

2007

60 (65y)

 

Release soft tissue adhesion

(once/wk; 1-4times until pain relieves)

Therapeutic Massage

(5times/wk, 4wks)

4

Pain score of KSSi: ^11.58

(P<0.05)

a N= number of patients included; b Mean age reported in years; c Mean difference was calculated between group comparisons; d VAS: Visual Analogue Scale (range 0-10, lower score = better outcome); e JOA: Japanese Orthopedic Association(walking subscale range 0-30, higher score = better outcome; stair activity subscale range 0-25, higher score = better outcome); f HSS: Hospital for Special Surgery Score (range 0-30, higher score = better outcome); g Score=sum of walking pain score and stair activity pain score ; h WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (range 0-50, lower score = better outcome);i KSS: Knee Society Score (range 0-50, higher score = better outcome); * indicate decrease; ^ indicate increase.


Disclosure: J. Li, None; P. Yuan, None; R. Zhang, None; B. Chen, None; B. Dong, None; W. Kang, None; X. Zhang, None; S. Hyon, None; R. R. Bannuru, None; W. F. Harvey, None; C. Wang, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Li J, Yuan P, Zhang R, Chen B, Dong B, Kang W, Zhang X, Hyon S, Bannuru RR, Harvey WF, Wang C. Acupotomy Therapy for Joint Pain Relief of Knee Osteoarthritis-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/acupotomy-therapy-for-joint-pain-relief-of-knee-osteoarthritis-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/acupotomy-therapy-for-joint-pain-relief-of-knee-osteoarthritis-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology