ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2183

Access to Prescription Drugs in Canada: Results from an Online Survey

Nick Bansback1,2,3, Cheryl L. Koehn4, Judy Chiu5, Melanie Mulder6 and Linda Li1, 1Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 2University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3St Paul's Hospital, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Arthritis Consumer Experts, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Economics, Education, funding, patient, patient engagement and patient participation

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Health Services Research Poster III – ACR/ARHP

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Prescription medications are an important treatment option for patients living with arthritis. However, patients may often not have access to certain medications they hear about in the news, in part because a medication may not meet regulatory or reimbursement criteria, or may not be included in a person’s private health insurance drug coverage. The purpose of this study is to understand knowledge about access to prescription medications in Canada.

Methods: A 20-minute pre- post-survey was conducted using a market research panel. The survey asked questions about prescription drug reimbursement coverage (e.g. are they covered in public drug plans and whether it differs across provinces), the regulatory approval process (e.g. what information is used by Health Canada), who pays for a drug covered by the public drug plan and how it is paid for (e.g. new money versus existing money), and the percentage of the cost that is paid by public drug plans, paid directly by the patient, or not filled by older Canadians due to affordability.

Results: A total of 705 Canadians completed the survey. Most respondents were from Ontario (51%), British Columbia (14%), Alberta (11%), and Quebec (11%). Knowledge on the process of prescription drug approval is low. Most respondents were unaware of the type of information is assessed by Health Canada in the approval process (80%) (many thought that price or cost-effectiveness were considered at this stage). Only 55% of respondents knew that certain prescription drugs paid for by the public drug plan may be covered in some parts of Canada but not others, and only 9% knew that federal recommendation and provincial agreement are required before a Health Canada approved prescription drug is covered by public drug plans (91%). Interestingly, 80% of respondents thought new money is allocated to new drugs that are approved (while current practice often requires money to be diverted from existing spending). Respondents also overestimated how much Canadians pay directly for prescription medications, and how many older Canadians did not fill a prescription because of affordability. Participants were motivated to learn more, particularly about costs and accountability in the Canadian health care system.

Conclusion: The general lack of knowledge about regulatory and reimbursement access to prescription medications limits informed dialogue with patients and the public. This includes changes to the approval process of prescription medications and how decisions are made around allocating budgets to certain prescription drugs. We have developed an educational video that seeks to improve this knowledge and engage patients and the public in these important conversations.


Disclosure: N. Bansback, None; C. L. Koehn, None; J. Chiu, None; M. Mulder, None; L. Li, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bansback N, Koehn CL, Chiu J, Mulder M, Li L. Access to Prescription Drugs in Canada: Results from an Online Survey [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/access-to-prescription-drugs-in-canada-results-from-an-online-survey/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/access-to-prescription-drugs-in-canada-results-from-an-online-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology