ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3078

ABCG2 rs2231142 predicts Poor Response to Allopurinol in Patients with Gout

Lisa K. Stamp1, Mary Wallace2, Tony R. Merriman3, Amanda Phipps-Green4, Ruth Topless4,5, Jill Drake6, Paul Tan7, Nicola Dalbeth8 and Rebecca Roberts4, 1Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2Surgical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 3Biochemistry Dept, PO Box 56, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 4University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 6Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand, 7University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 8Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Allopurinol and gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: ACR Plenary Session III: Discovery 2015

Session Type: ACR Plenary Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose:
Many
patients fail to reach target serum urate (SU) on allopurinol. Although the most
common causes of inadequate response are non-adherence and low dosing in kidney
disease, there are a group of adherent patients who fail to achieve target SU and
can be considered poor responders to allopurinol. In patients who have
undergone allopurinol dose escalation, poor response can be defined as failure
to reach the recommended target SU of <6mg/dl on allopurinol ≤300mg/day.
A recent GWAS identified the urate raising minor allele of ABCG2 rs2231142
as a determinant of poor allopurinol response
[1]. However, the definition
of response used in the GWAS was allopurinol related SU change with only weak assessment
of adherence. The aim of our study was to examine the association of ABCG2
rs2231142 with allopurinol response in a well phenotyped group of
patients with gout.

 

Methods: Patients with gout
according to 1977 ARA criteria participating in clinical trials of allopurinol
were recruited. Good response was defined as SU <6mg/dl on
allopurinol ≤300mg/d and poor response was defined as SU ≥6mg/dl
despite allopurinol >300mg/d.  Adherence was assessed by plasma oxypurinol
concentrations >20umol/l and in the absence of oxypurinol concentration SU
reduction with allopurinol dose escalation.  Genotyping for ABCG2 (rs2231142)
was performed using a pre-designed SNP TaqMan assay. Logistic regression
analyses were used to test for an association between poor response to
allopurinol and rs2231142.  Adjustments were made for age, sex, body
mass index (BMI) and ethnicity and further separate adjustments were made for eGFR,
diuretic use and SU off urate lowering therapy.

 

Results : Of 264 patients with
gout receiving allopurinol, 120 (45.4%) patients were good responders, 68
(25.8%) were poor responders and 76 (28.8%) were either non-adherent or could
not be classified. Of the 188 patients included in the responder analysis, 85.6%
were male, mean age was 59 years and 32% were receiving a diuretic. The mean
BMI was 34.1 kg/m2 and eGFR 55.5mls/min/1.72m2.  Mean SU
prior to urate lowering therapy was 10.1 mg/dl. Mean SU was 5.2 mg/dl in good
responders and 7.0mg/dl in poor responders. Mean allopurinol dose was 263 mg/d
(100-300) in the good responders and 413 mg/d (350-700) in poor responders. Logistic
regression found that the minor allele of ABCG2 rs2231142 was
significantly associated with poor response to allopurinol (Table; OR=2.9, P=1.5×10-4). 
This association persisted after adjusting for eGFR, diuretic use and SU off
ULT (Table).

 

Conclusion: This study demonstrates
that
ABCG2 rs2231142 predicts
poor response to allopurinol, as defined by SU ≥6mg/dl despite
allopurinol >300mg/d.  ABCG2 genotyping may allow identification of
people with gout for whom standard doses of allopurinol are unlikely to lead to
therapeutic target serum urate levels.   

 

1.         Wen C, et al Clin
Pharm Ther
2015, 97(5):518-525.


Disclosure: L. K. Stamp, Astra Zeneca, 5; M. Wallace, None; T. R. Merriman, None; A. Phipps-Green, None; R. Topless, None; J. Drake, None; P. Tan, None; N. Dalbeth, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, 5,AstraZeneca, 8,Ardea Biosciences, 2; R. Roberts, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stamp LK, Wallace M, Merriman TR, Phipps-Green A, Topless R, Drake J, Tan P, Dalbeth N, Roberts R. ABCG2 rs2231142 predicts Poor Response to Allopurinol in Patients with Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/abcg2-rs2231142-predicts-poor-response-to-allopurinol-in-patients-with-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/abcg2-rs2231142-predicts-poor-response-to-allopurinol-in-patients-with-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology