ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2220

Abaloparatide Followed by Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Incidence in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis

Nancy Lane1, Richard Weiss 2, Bruce Mitlak 3, Yamei Wang 4, Guillermo Valenzuela 5 and Chad Deal 6, 1University of California at Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, 2Radius Health, Inc, Waltham, 3Radius Health, Inc, Waltham, MA, 4Radius Health, Inc, Waltham, 5Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists, Plantation, FL, 6Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: abaloparatide, alendronate and fractures, Osteoarthritis, osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Osteoporosis & Metabolic Bone Disease – Basic & Clinical Science Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Osteoporosis (OP) and osteoarthritis (OA) are often comorbid conditions in the elderly, with prevalence of OP in patients with OA reported as high as 30%. Previous studies have found significantly higher baseline BMD in OA patients than their non-OA counterparts, despite an increased risk for fracture, potentially contributing to delayed diagnosis and treatment in this population. In the ACTIVE phase 3 study of postmenopausal OP women, 18 months (M) of abaloparatide (ABL) treatment significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced the risk of new vertebral, nonvertebral, clinical, and major OP fractures vs placebo (PBO) (NCT01343004). Women receiving ABL or PBO in ACTIVE were offered enrollment in the ACTIVExtend extension study in which both groups received 24M open-label alendronate (ALN) 70 mg weekly for a total of 43M (18M ABL or PBO, 1M for reconsent, and 24M ALN) (NCT01657162). The objective of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of ABL followed by ALN (ABL/ALN) vs PBO/ALN in the subgroup of patients with OA.

Methods: ACTIVExtend enrolled postmenopausal women with OP between the ages of 50 and 85; 558 were from the original ABL group and 581 from the PBO group of the ACTIVE study. Patients with the following terms in their medical history were included: “ongoing osteoarthritis” (including spine, knee, hand, foot, shoulder, and other sites), “spinal osteoarthritis”, “nodal/ hand osteoarthritis”, or “intervertebral disc degeneration”. New vertebral fracture incidence was evaluated using the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, other efficacy endpoints were evaluated using the ITT population. The percent mean changes in BMD from baseline to 43 months were calculated for the total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and lumbar spine (LS).

Results: A total of 395 ACTIVExtend patients with ongoing OA were identified (ABL/ALN, 190; PBO/ALN, 205). Most common sites of OA were at the knee (39.2%), and spine (38.5%). At baseline, 78 (19.7%) had a prevalent VF, 94 (23.8%) reported ≥1 prior NVF within the last 5 years, and 175 (44.3%) had no prior fractures. At 43M, 1.1% (2/186) ABL/ALN and 7.0% (14/201) PBO/ALN patients experienced ≥ 1 new vertebral fracture (P=0.004). Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence for other fracture endpoints was similar across treatment groups. Mean percent change in BMD were all significantly greater with ABL/ALN vs PBO/ALN at all timepoints assessed (P < 0.001). At 43M, BMD mean percent change from baseline was 6.0% ABL/ALN vs 2.3% PBO/ALN at the total hip, 4.9% ABL/ALN vs 1.4% PBO/ALN femoral neck, and 14.3% ABL/ALN vs 6.7% PBO/ALN lumbar spine. Most common TEAEs overall were upper respiratory tract infection (9.0% vs 8.3%), arthralgia (7.9% vs 8.8%), worsening osteoarthritis (8.5% vs 6.4%), and back pain (7.9% vs 4.4%), for ABL/ALN vs PBO/ALN arms, respectively.

Conclusion: Improvements in vertebral fracture risk as well as significant gains in BMD were maintained through 43M with ABL/ALN vs PBO/ALN. This post hoc analysis suggests that ABL/ALN was effective in a subgroup of patients with OP and OA, with no new safety signals identified.


Disclosure: N. Lane, Amgen Inc., 5, 8, GSK, 5, Radius Health, Inc., 8; R. Weiss, Radius Health, Inc., 1, 3; B. Mitlak, Radius Health, Inc., 1, 3; Y. Wang, Radius Health, Inc., 1, 3; G. Valenzuela, AbbVie, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 5, GSK, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Merck, 2, 5, MLKCDT, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sanofi Regeneron, 2, 5, UCB, 5; C. Deal, Amgen, 5, 8, Eli LIlly, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lane N, Weiss R, Mitlak B, Wang Y, Valenzuela G, Deal C. Abaloparatide Followed by Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Incidence in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/abaloparatide-followed-by-alendronate-on-bone-mineral-density-and-fracture-incidence-in-postmenopausal-women-with-osteoporosis-and-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/abaloparatide-followed-by-alendronate-on-bone-mineral-density-and-fracture-incidence-in-postmenopausal-women-with-osteoporosis-and-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology