ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 56

A Validated Mathematical Model Using Electronic Health Records to Identify Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients for Observational Studies

Aarat M. Patel1, Ilinca D. Metes2, Larry W. Moreland3, Melissa Saul4, Stephen R. Wisniewski5 and Marc C. Levesque6, 1Rheumatology & Clinical Immun / Pediatric Rheumatology, Univ of Pittsburgh Med Ctr / Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 3Division of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 4Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 5Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, 6Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services Research: Epidemiology and Outcomes of Rheumatic Disease I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: To develop and validate a search algorithm with a high specificity and sensitivity to identify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a large health care system linked by an electronic health record (EHR) system.

Methods: Records from the Medical Archival Retrieval System (MARS) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) were used to identify potential RA patients.  We searched the UPMC MARS system for subjects with a 714.0 International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) code and used a recursive partitioning method to develop a search algorithm for the identification of RA patients; the recursive partitioning method used the 714.0 ICD-9 code and tested 35 additional variables (serology, inflammatory markers, medications and specific words in physician notes).  At each step during the development and validation of the algorithm, patients were classified by the algorithm into those likely or unlikely to have RA and representative sets of these patient records were reviewed to determine whether subjects met ACR/EULAR RA classification criteria.

Results: We initially analyzed the effect of the clinical setting (inpatient vs. outpatient rheumatology clinic) on the identification of RA patients.  For inpatient subjects, there was a low PPV of a 714.0 ICD-9 code for the identification of RA patients (39.0%) whereas for outpatient-rheumatology subjects there was a high PPV of a 714.0 ICD-9 code for the identification of RA patients (87.3%), (n=95, p<0.0001; Fisher’s exact test).  When the records of outpatient-rheumatology patients with and without a 714.0 ICD-9 code were analyzed (N=400), the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of a 714.0 ICD-9 code was 98%, 88%, 87% and 98%, respectively.  Using recursive partitioning a 3 variable algorithm was identified 1.) 714.0 ICD-9 code, 2.) ratio of the words “rheumatoid arthritis” per rheumatology visit and 3.) ratio of “RA” per rheumatology visit improved the specificity for identifying RA patients.  The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the algorithm was 93%, 95%, 94% and 95%, respectively (n=400).  Validation of this algorithm with analysis of an additional 400 subjects produced similar results (95%, 96%, 96%, 95%, respectively).   Using this algorithm to analyze all unique outpatient-rheumatology patients in the 2009 calendar year (n= 5,859) resulted in the identification of 1,495 RA patients.  The final validation step with a sample of these subjects (n=400) resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 93%, 96%, 93% and 96%, respectively. 

Conclusion: The ICD-9 code for RA (714.0) alone was not reliable for identifying RA patients in the inpatient setting and had suboptimal specificity in the outpatient rheumatology setting.  We developed and validated a simple algorithm using recursive partitioning that used 3 variables to identify RA patients.  This simple algorithm, which is now validated for an entire calendar year, represents a substantial improvement in terms of sensitivity and specificity over existing published algorithms.  Using an EHR and this electronic search algorithm will enable large-scale comparative effectiveness studies on the treatment and management of RA in “real-world” clinical settings.


Disclosure:

A. M. Patel,
None;

I. D. Metes,
None;

L. W. Moreland,
None;

M. Saul,
None;

S. R. Wisniewski,
None;

M. C. Levesque,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

UCB,

5,

Crescendo,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-validated-mathematical-model-using-electronic-health-records-to-identify-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-for-observational-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology