ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1169

A Systematic Review of Rheumatic Disease Epidemiology in the Indigenous Populations of Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand

Cairistin McDougall1, Kelle Hurd1 and Cheryl Barnabe2, 1University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2Division of Rheumatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Epidemiologic methods, Lupus, Native Americans, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Two important reviews have summarized the epidemiology of rheumatic disease (Peschken 1999) and RA (Ferucci 2005) in Indigenous populations of North America. Our objective was to update these reviews, incorporate non-medical databases, and expand the scope to include Indigenous populations of New Zealand and Australia.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in medical (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL), Indigenous and conference abstract databases (to June 2015). Search terms for Indigenous populations were combined with terms for inflammatory arthritis conditions, connective tissue disorders, crystal arthritis, and osteoarthritis. Studies were included if they reported on the incidence or prevalence of rheumatic disease in Canadian, American, Australian or New Zealand Indigenous populations.

Results:

A total of 5,269 titles and abstracts were reviewed, of which 504 underwent full-text review and 88 met inclusion criteria. Prevalence rates of RA in Alaskan Native populations ranged from 0.6 to 2.4%, mostly similar to those estimated in the general population. RA prevalence was estimated at 2.2 to 6.8% in Blackfeet, Chippewa and Pima American Indian populations, higher than in the general population of the United States. Reported rates in Canadian First Nations ranged from 1.0 to 7.1%, increased compared to the general population by at least two-fold. The prevalence of RA in Australian Indigenous populations was 2.7% compared to 1.9% in non-Indigenous people. New Zealand Maori RA prevalence was estimated at 3.3%. Contemporary studies of SLE found prevalence rates to be 149-159 per 100,000 in Alaskan Natives and 138-263 per 100,000 in Native American populations, increased from historical studies. Canadian Indigenous SLE prevalence was 42-348 per 100,000, and in Australian Indigenous populations was 13-93 per 100,000, at least double that of non-Indigenous populations. Incidence rates of SLE (per 100,000) were 7 in Alaska Natives, up to 30 in American Indians, 11 in Australian Indigenous and up to 7 in Canadian First Nations populations. Spondyloarthropathies affected 0.2-2.7% of Alaska Native populations, and <0.04% of American Indian populations studied; in Canadian Inuit, spondyloarthropathy prevalence was estimated at 0.9%. Ankylosing spondylitis prevalence was estimated at 3.0% in Pima American Indian populations, and 2.3% in Canadian Haida populations, but just 0.4% in First Nations in Alberta, and 0% in New Zealand Maori. Crystal arthropathy prevalence is comparatively low in Alaska Native and Canadian First Nations in contrast to New Zealand Maori populations, where prevalence was 6.4 to 11.1%, significantly higher than non-Maori or European populations. Osteoarthritis prevalence was estimated at 6-22% in Canadian First Nations, 1.5% in Canadian Inuit, 7-32% in Australian Indigenous populations, and 4-6% in New Zealand Maori over 50 years of age.

Conclusion: Rheumatic disease prevalence in North American, Australian and New Zealand Indigenous populations is significantly higher than that of non-Indigenous populations, but with variation in estimates across tribal ancestry relevant to health services planning.


Disclosure: C. McDougall, None; K. Hurd, None; C. Barnabe, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McDougall C, Hurd K, Barnabe C. A Systematic Review of Rheumatic Disease Epidemiology in the Indigenous Populations of Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-systematic-review-of-rheumatic-disease-epidemiology-in-the-indigenous-populations-of-canada-the-united-states-australia-and-new-zealand/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-systematic-review-of-rheumatic-disease-epidemiology-in-the-indigenous-populations-of-canada-the-united-states-australia-and-new-zealand/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology