ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2609

A Systematic Literature Mining and Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Possible Drug Candidates for Repositioning in Lupus

Peter E. Lipsky, Matt Ryals, Adam Labonte, Sarah Heuer, James Dittman, Michelle Catalina and Amrie Grammer, AMPEL BioSolutions and RILITE Research Institute, Charlottesville, VA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Big data, drug therapy and drug treatment, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapeutics and Clinical Trial Design

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Since new therapies for lupus have been extremely slow to develop and lupus patients have a great unmet medical need, an independent pharma-external effort has been undertaken to evaluate drugs for potential use in this autoimmune disease. In addition, bioinformatic analyses of gene expression profiles were used to confirm the potential utility of identified drug candidates.

Methods:

A comprehensive effort to, identify possible drug candidates for repositioning into lupus was initiated in 2013 by crowd-sourcing suggestions from the lupus community (www.linkedin.com/lrxlstat) in conjunction with a comprehensive effort at literature mining for information relevant to the more than 1000 compounds approved for human use by the FDA. In 2013, the evidence-based Composite Lupus Treatment Scoring (CoLTs) of each of 157 therapies considered potentially appropriate for lupus was carried out1. Since the initial evaluation, the FDA has approved > 125 new drug indications, 7 of which targeted a rheumatic disease, but none of which was approved for in lupus. Additionally, >50 drugs-in-development for other indications were identified as possible lupus treatments. All drugs were ranked by the CoLT scoring system that takes into account scientific rationale, experience in lupus mice/human cells, previous clinical experience in autoimmunity, drug properties and adverse event profile. In addition, potential utility of a drug target in SLE was gauged by bioinformatic analysis of gene expression from tissues (kidneys, skin, synovium) and the periphery (whole blood, B cells, T cells, myeloid cells) from both active and inactive patients . Microarray and RNASeq data were analyzed for differentially expressed genes compared with healthy patients and for correlations with clinical parameters.

Results:

Of the >125 newly FDA–approved drug indications, fifty were judged to be potentially relevant for lupus and were evaluated in detail and nine were identified as high-priority candidates for repositioning including drugs targeting cellular metabolism, cell cycle checkpoints, kinases and various pathways in the immune system. Scoring of drugs-in-development added 25 high priority candidates including inhibitors of complement, HDAC, PARP, ubiquitin ligases and as well as antagonists of cell surface receptors and cytokines. In each circumstance, evidence from literature mining was confirmed by gene expression analysis.

Conclusion:

Independently scoring the properties of newly approved drugs and potential drug targets has not only identified unique candidates that could be useful in lupus and possibly other autoimmune/inflammatory conditions, but has also yielded a rigorous evidence-based process by which therapies can be objectively rated for possible clinical application to treat these conditions, thereby mitigating risk in drug development.

References:

  1. Lupus 10:1150, 2016.

Disclosure: P. E. Lipsky, None; M. Ryals, None; A. Labonte, None; S. Heuer, None; J. Dittman, None; M. Catalina, None; A. Grammer, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lipsky PE, Ryals M, Labonte A, Heuer S, Dittman J, Catalina M, Grammer A. A Systematic Literature Mining and Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Possible Drug Candidates for Repositioning in Lupus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-systematic-literature-mining-and-gene-expression-analysis-identifies-possible-drug-candidates-for-repositioning-in-lupus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-systematic-literature-mining-and-gene-expression-analysis-identifies-possible-drug-candidates-for-repositioning-in-lupus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology