ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 504

A Subgroup Analysis of the Efficacy of Filgotinib in Demographic and Clinical Subgroups of Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

Kenneth Kalunian1, Mark Genovese 2, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg 3, Beatrix Bartok 4, Alena Pechonkina 4, Ying Guo 4, Chantal Tasset 5, John Sundy 4, Kurt de Vlam 6, David Walker 7 and Tsutomu Takeuchi 8, 1Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 2Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 3Department of Rheumatology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France, 4Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, 5Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium, 6Department of Rheumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 7Northumbria Healthcare, Northumbria, United Kingdom, 8Division of Rheumatology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Novel Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: RA patients who have failed biologic DMARDs represent an unmet medical need. We explored the impact of baseline demographics and clinical characteristics on filgotinib efficacy in patients with active RA who have inadequate response to ≥1 prior bDMARD (bDMARD-IR).

Methods: In the global, phase 3 FINCH-2 study (NCT02873936), 449 patients with moderately-to-severely active RA and inadequate response to ≥1 prior bDMARDs were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, or placebo.1 We evaluated prespecified subgroups including baseline demographic and clinical characteristics such as sex at birth, seropositivity for RF and/or ACPA, disease duration, disease activity, hsCRP levels, concurrent use of corticosteroids, and different classes of DMARDs on filgotinib efficacy as measured by ACR20 and DAS28(CRP) for low disease activity and remission in patients with active RA who were bDMARD-IR.

Results: Of the 448 patients randomized and treated at baseline, 80.4% were female with a mean age of 56 years and a mean RA duration of 12.4 years. Clinical efficacy outcomes at week 24 as measured by ACR20, DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 and DAS28(CRP) < 2.6 by patient demographics and clinical baseline characteristics are described in Tables 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Conclusion: Compared with placebo, filgotinib consistently improved clinical outcomes in bDMARD-refractory patients. Benefits were observed for filgotinib across subgroups defined by various demographic and clinical baseline characteristics. There was an absence of impact of disease duration, seropositivity, disease activity and concurrent medication use, notably on the effectiveness of filgotinib.

 

References:

1. Genovese MC, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Filgotinib in a Phase 3 Trial of Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic Dmards [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 10).


Table 1_rRA

Table 1. Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24
Unless otherwise noted, data presented as n/N -%-
CI, confidence interval; csDMARD, conventional synthetic DMARD; hsCRP, high-sensitivity CRP; QD, once daily.


Table 2_rRA

Table 2. Proportion of Patients Achieving Low Disease Activity at Week 24
Unless otherwise noted, data presented as n/N -%-.
CI, confidence interval; csDMARD, conventional synthetic DMARD; hsCRP, high-sensitivity CRP; QD, once daily.


Table 3_rRA

Table 3. Proportion of Patients Achieving Remission at Week 24
Unless otherwise noted, data presented as n/N -%-.
CI, confidence interval; csDMARD, conventional synthetic DMARD; hsCRP, high-sensitivity CRP; QD, once daily.


Disclosure: K. Kalunian, AbbVie, 9, Abbvie, 5, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Biogen, 5, 9, BMS, 2, 9, Chemocentryx, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, 9, Equillium, 5, Exagen, 2, Genentech/Roche, 5, Gilead, 9, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 9, GSK, 5, Idosia, 2, Janssen, 5, Kirin, 2, MedImmune, 5, Nektar, 5, Pfizer, 2, Resolve, 2, Roche, 9, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2; M. Genovese, AbbVie, 2, 5, Abbvie, 2, 5, AbbVie, Inc., 9, Astellas, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, EMD Merck Serono, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Galapagos NV, 2, 5, 9, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Gilead Science, 9, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, 9, GSK, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 9, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Pfizer, Inc., 9, Pzier, 9, RPharm, 5, Sanofi Genzyme, 2, 5, Vertex, 2, 5; J. Gottenberg, Abbvie, 8, BMS, 2, 5, Lilly, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 8, Sanofi-Genzyme, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; B. Bartok, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3, 4; A. Pechonkina, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3, 4; Y. Guo, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3, 4; C. Tasset, Galapagos, 1, 3, Galapagos NV, 3, 4; J. Sundy, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3, 4; K. de Vlam, Celgene, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; D. Walker, BMS, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 8, Lilly, 8, Novartis, 8, Pfizer, 8; T. Takeuchi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kalunian K, Genovese M, Gottenberg J, Bartok B, Pechonkina A, Guo Y, Tasset C, Sundy J, de Vlam K, Walker D, Takeuchi T. A Subgroup Analysis of the Efficacy of Filgotinib in Demographic and Clinical Subgroups of Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-subgroup-analysis-of-the-efficacy-of-filgotinib-in-demographic-and-clinical-subgroups-of-patients-with-refractory-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-subgroup-analysis-of-the-efficacy-of-filgotinib-in-demographic-and-clinical-subgroups-of-patients-with-refractory-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology