ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1923

A Study To Determine Patient Satisfaction With a Nurse-Led Injection Clinic In Rheumatology

Margaret Saldanha1, Kathleen Brown2, Dawn Heap1, Cynthia Mech3, Melissa Deamude1, Kathy Kislinsky1, Debbie McClory4, Alpesh Shah5 and William G. Bensen6, 1Dr. William G. Bensen, Rheumatology Health Team, St. Joseph's Hospital Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2Dr. William Bensen Rheumatology Clinic, Rheumatology Health Team, St. Joseph's Hospital Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 3Dr. William G. Bensen, Rheumatology Health Team, Dr. Bensen's Rheumatology Clinic, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 4Dr. William G. Bensen Rheumatology Clinic, Rheumatology Health Team Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 5Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, MSc in Clinical Epidemiology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 6Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Clinical Professor, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: inflammatory arthritis, nursing roles, Patient Satisfaction, steroids and tendonitis/bursitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

There is a widening care gap in Canada between patients who need Rheumatology care and the capacity of the system to deliver that care in a timely manner.  At St. Joseph’s Hospital and McMaster University in Hamilton we have developed several models of team-based care with trained rheumatology nurses. 

One successful team -based model has been a nurse managed injection clinic treating patients with inflammatory arthritis or soft tissue pain. All patients fill out a health check questionnaire and authorize their consent before receiving injections, ensuring patient safety. Nurses use a set of directives written by the rheumatologist as guidelines for the clinic with a Rheumatologist always present on site.

This clinic, run twice weekly, allows immediate access and assessment of patients with flares or potentially needing steroid injections. Currently this clinic administers nearly 100 injections per week. The purpose of this study was to assess patient perspectives on how they view this team -based model as compared to a traditional MD model which historically would cause a delay of treatment by 8-10 weeks before an assessment of their disease was possible.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study sampling 217 consecutive patients who attended the nurse-led injection clinic was conducted at Dr. Bensen’s Rheumatology Practice in Hamilton, Canada from May 2013 to June 2013. Patients were given a structured self-administered questionnaire to determine their satisfaction with the steroid injection clinic run by the nurses. Those that have English as a second language were excluded as well as anyone who wasn’t able to understand and follow directions on the questionnaire. Efficacy and relevance was assessed by patients answering eight qualitative questions.

Results:

The results of this study indicated that patients were offered timely access to care at critical times when they were experiencing a flare of disease symptoms. 83% of patients responded that their pain was better managed in this clinic. 96% of patients affirmed that they were able to be seen within 2 weeks of their onset of symptoms. All patients surveyed felt comfortable discussing their health issues with the nurse and felt confident in the nurse’s assessment and injection techniques. Overall the patients reported that because of this nurse led injection clinic model their quality of life living with a rheumatologic condition improved.

 Conclusion:

Our results show that a nurse run steroid injection clinic is both valued by patients for pain and inflammation management and is readily available. This demonstrates a high degree of satisfaction with the nurse run program and they feel very strongly that without this clinic their pain management would not be optimal. Without this clinic, patients indicated that they would seek treatment elsewhere, mostly with their family doctors, emergency rooms, or walk-in clinics, resulting in further congestion in an already overwhelmed healthcare system. This study determined that nurse run steroid injection clinics are both needed and valued by our patients in Hamilton, Canada.


Disclosure:

M. Saldanha,
None;

K. Brown,
None;

D. Heap,
None;

C. Mech,
None;

M. Deamude,
None;

K. Kislinsky,
None;

D. McClory,
None;

A. Shah,
None;

W. G. Bensen,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-study-to-determine-patient-satisfaction-with-a-nurse-led-injection-clinic-in-rheumatology/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology