ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1288

A Significant Number of Patients with Chronic Arthritis Received a Reduced Dosage of Biological Drugs: an Observational Study in Clinical Practice

Jose Inciarte-Mundo1, Maria Victoria Hernández2, Violeta Rosario1, Sonia Cabrera1, Virginia Ruiz-Esquide3, Maria Eugenia Gomez-Caballero1, Jose A. Gómez-Puerta1, Julio Ramirez1, Juan D. Cañete2 and Raimon Sanmarti1, 1Arthritis Unit. Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona. IDIBAPS. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 3Rheumatology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondylarthropathy and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Biological agents are used to treat chronic arthritis according to the standard dosages from phase III clinical trials. However, in some patients, a good response to treatment may allow the dosage to be reduced, the timing lengthened, and costs reduced. Our objective was to analyze a strategy of dosage reduction of biological agents in patients with chronic arthritis attended by the rheumatology department of a tertiary hospital.

Methods: Cross-sectional study which included all patients attended consecutively between June 2011 and November 2011 by a single clinician, and who had received ≥1 dose of a biological agent in 2011. Data analyzed were: demographic characteristics, diagnosis and disease duration, DMARD therapy, dosage, type and duration of biological agent used; time on reduced dosage and reason for dosage reduction. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients we also analyzed disease activity (DAS28 score) and serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP). The reduced dosage was defined as a lower dosage than recommended in the summary of product characteristics and was not based on a structured protocol.

Results: We included 170 patients (67% female); mean age: 51.1±14.3 years. Diagnoses were: 56.5% RA, 18.8% ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 11.8% psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and 12.9% miscellaneous (MISC), including 9 juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 3 undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy, 3 uveitis, 2 connective tissue disorder and 1 SAPHO. Mean disease duration was 14.5±8 years, with no differences between diagnoses. Mean duration of current biological therapy was 47.7±35.6 months, with 134 patients receiving TNF blockers and 36 patients receiving non anti-TNF (abatacept, rituximab and tocilizumab). 53% of patients received concomitant therapy with DMARDs, mainly in the RA group, and 28.2% had received ≥1 biological agent. At the time of analysis, 76 patients (44.7%) were receiving low dosages of biologicals (56% of etanercept patients, 55% adalimumab, 45% tocilizumab, 39% infliximab and 11% abatacept). Of the 76 patients, 51.3% had RA, 23.7% AS, 13.2% PsA and 11.8% MISC. Most commonly used low dosages were 50 mg every 15 days for etanercept, 40 mg every 3 weeks for adalimumab, 5mg every 9-10 weeks for infliximab and 6 mg every 4 weeks for tocilizumab. The reason for dosage reduction was disease remission in 68 patients (89.5%) and low activity in 8 (10.5%). Mean time of dosage reduction was 17.2±21.1 months. In RA patients, mean DAS28 score and CRP levels were lower in patients with reduced dosage than in patients with standard dosage (2.57 vs 3.47, p=0.09) and (0.37 vs 1.09, p=0.007), respectively, and the percentage of remission was higher (76.3% vs 30.7%, p=0.000). The medical decision at the time of data collection was to maintain low-dosage biological treatment in 63 patients (82.9%) due to low disease activity and/or remission, assessed by clinical judgment and regular scores.

Conclusion: Near half our chronic arthritis patients receiving biological therapy were able to reduce the dosage to below that of established clinical guidelines, preserving remission or low disease activity in many cases. This dosage reduction was observed both in RA and spondyloarthropathies, and with different biological drugs.


Disclosure:

J. Inciarte-Mundo,
None;

M. V. Hernández,
None;

V. Rosario,
None;

S. Cabrera,
None;

V. Ruiz-Esquide,
None;

M. E. Gomez-Caballero,
None;

J. A. Gómez-Puerta,
None;

J. Ramirez,
None;

J. D. Cañete,
None;

R. Sanmarti,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-significant-number-of-patients-with-chronic-arthritis-received-a-reduced-dosage-of-biological-drugs-an-observational-study-in-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology