ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1011

A Rheumatology Model of Care Re-design: Integrating the Advanced Practice Provider

Lisa Carnago1, Kristin Holbrook2, David Leverenz3, Natalie Rivera4 and Allison Dimsdale5, 1Duke Health, Hillsborough, NC, 2Duke Health, Raleigh, NC, 3Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 4Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, 5PDC Advanced Practice, Duke School of Nursing, Durham, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Access to care, Work Force

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (0993–1012) Health Services Research Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: There is a lack of guidance surrounding integration of Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) into specialty practices utilizing interprofessional Models of Care (MoC). Due to current and projected workforce shortages combined with rising patient need in the field of Rheumatology, multiple methods were utilized to engage both APP and physician perspectives to develop a MoC specific to an academic Rheumatology practice. Initial goals included understanding the current and desired MoC, as well as integration of APPs into optimized models.

Methods: Utilizing a mixed methods sequential-exploratory design through a quality improvement lens, a blueprint for a MOC re-design was developed and will be presented here. Quality Improvement (QI) strategies planned: 1. Needs assessment 2. Baseline data collection 3. Dissemination 4. Team building 5. Implementation 6. Evaluation with ongoing improvements as needed (Figure 1). Phases one through four were completed as part of this project with divisional consideration for implementation of phases five and six in the future.

Results: In the needs assessment phase, we interviewed key stakeholders (divisional leadership) to develop shared goals for the optimal MoC. These goals included quality of patient care, access, and addressing barriers at the patient, physician, APP, environmental, and organizational levels. In the next phase, data collection, we distributed a survey to 12 physicians and 8 APPs in our practice addressing eleven domains: 1. Models of Care 2. Physician 3. Appropriateness of an APP to see 17 common Rheumatological diagnoses as a new or return visit 4. Logistical Considerations 5. Staff Utilization 6. Provider Satisfaction 7. Telehealth Preferences 8. Patient Impact 9. Burnout Inventory 10. Work Life Balance and 11. Joy in Work. During phase three, key findings were communicated with divisional leadership and then with clinicians and staff followed by an iterative process for team building and design in phase four. Surveys showed low satisfaction with the current MoC. These findings suggest that the APP is being utilized in variable MoC and that many physicians are dissatisfied with current MoC. Additionally, strong preferences for parallel and independent practice, standardization of MoC, and a formal structure that integrates the APP was preferred by both APPs and Physicians (Table 1). The top two clinician foci for the MoC included quality of care and prevention of burnout. Clinicians agreed that the main barriers to implementing a MoC were a lack of a well-defined and documented MoC, clinic space and communication. Based upon these findings, a proposed team-based MoC was developed (Figure 2).

Conclusion: Using a mixed methods QI approach is effective to elicit clinical needs and barriers with significant clinician buy-in. Improved understanding of clinicians’ desired MoC and what this MoC should focus on impacts team-based structures, for which the APP is a critical component. As the role of the APP is predominantly geared towards the clinical mission, improving full scope integration of the APP via MoC re-design in specialty practices, including Rheumatology, is pivotal to improve the quality of patient care and access.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: L. Carnago: None; K. Holbrook: None; D. Leverenz: Pfizer, 5, Rheumatology Research Foundation, 5, Sanofi, 2; N. Rivera: None; A. Dimsdale: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Carnago L, Holbrook K, Leverenz D, Rivera N, Dimsdale A. A Rheumatology Model of Care Re-design: Integrating the Advanced Practice Provider [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-rheumatology-model-of-care-re-design-integrating-the-advanced-practice-provider/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-rheumatology-model-of-care-re-design-integrating-the-advanced-practice-provider/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology