ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 549

A Randomized, Open-Label Study of Maintenance of Partial Remission with Naproxen Vs No Treatment: Results of the Infliximab As First Line Therapy in Patients with Early Active Axial Spondyloarthritis Trial, Part II

Joachim Sieper1, Jan Lenaerts2, Jürgen Wollenhaupt3, Vadim Mazurov4, L. Myasoutova5, Sung-Hwan Park6, Yeong W. Song7, Ruji Yao8, Denesh Chitkara9 and Nathan Vastesaeger10, 1Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Reuma-instituut, Hasselt, Belgium, 3Schön-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany, 4St. Petersburg Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russia, 5Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia, 6Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea, 7Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea, 8Merck Sharp & Dohme, Kenilworth, NJ, 9Merck Sharp and Dohme, Kenilworth, NJ, 10Merck Sharp & Dohme, Brussels, Belgium

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: In patients with axial SpA who have achieved partial remission, it is unclear whether continuous treatment with NSAIDs is superior to stopping treatment.

Objectives: To investigate whether continued treatment with naproxen (NPX) was superior to discontinuing all treatment in order to maintain disease control for 6 months in early, active axial SpA patients who were in partial remission after 28 weeks of therapy with either infliximab (IFX)+NPX or placebo (PBO)+NPX.

Methods: Part I of the INFAST study was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of IFX in biologic-naïve patients 18–48 years of age with early, active axial SpA. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive 28 weeks of treatment with either IV IFX 5 mg/kg (weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24)+NPX 1000 mg/d or IV PBO+NPX 1000 mg/d. In Part II of INFAST, patients who had achieved ASAS partial remission at week 28 continued in Part II of the study with no IFX treatment. These patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue on NPX or to stop NPX until week 52. Patients from the 2 treatment arms in Part I were equally balanced over the 2 groups in Part II. The main outcome was the proportion of subjects who maintained ASAS partial remission at week 52. Treatment group differences were analyzed using Fisher exact tests or ANCOVA. Predictors of remission were explored using Cox regression models. A flare was defined as BASDAI ≥30 mm (on a 100 mm VAS) during 2 consecutive visits within 1–3 weeks.

Results: 41 patients were randomized to NPX and 41 to no treatment in Part II of INFAST. 78% of patients in Part II had been in the IFX+NPX arm in Part I. At week 52, similar numbers of patients in the NPX group (19/40, 47.5%) and the no-treatment group (16/40, 40.0%) met the ASAS partial remission criteria, P=0.6525. In regression analyses, patients who received NPX in Part II stayed in remission longer than those who stopped all treatment (HR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.52). Initial therapy with IFX+NPX was a significant predictor of the duration of partial remission and sustained remission to week 52. Overall, the group data reflected low disease activity status through week 52 (BASDAI and ASDAS results in Table 1) with a slight, nonsignificant advantage for the NPX group over the no treatment group. The overall low disease activity status was consistent with the low flare rates in both groups (NPX, 1/40, 2.5% vs no treatment, 3/40, 7.5%; P=0.6153).

Table 1. Efficacy Outcomes by Treatment Group

Outcome

NPX
(N=40)

No Treatment
(N=40)

P Value

Week 28, mean

Week 52, mean

Change, mean (SD)

Week 28, mean

Week 52, mean

Change, mean (SD)

BASDAI (100 mm VAS)

7.1

12.2

5.8 (10.64)

5.4

16.9

10.9 (13.74)

0.1079

ASDAS

0.9

1.5

0.6 (0.71)

1.0

1.6

0.6 (0.63)

0.8374

ESR (mm/hr)

7.1

14.7

7.6 (11.63)

9.4

13.6

5.1
(10.10)

0.4637

CRP (mg/dL)

0.37

0.69

0.29 (0.924)

0.53

0.72

0.26
(0.707)

0.9930

During the follow-up period, 1 serious adverse event was reported in the no-treatment group. No deaths occurred.

Conclusion: In patients with axial SpA who reached partial remission after treatment with either IFX+NPX or NPX alone, disease activity remained low during 6 months in which NPX was maintained or all treatment was discontinued. About half of patients remained in clinical remission for 6 months. A slight advantage may occur for patients continuing NPX treatment vs no treatment at all.


Disclosure:

J. Sieper,

Merck, Abbott, Pfizer,

2,

Merck, Abbott, Pfizer, UCB, Roche, Lilly,

5,

Merck, Abbott, Pfizer,

8;

J. Lenaerts,

Abbott, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Astra Zeneca,

5;

J. Wollenhaupt,

MSD,

5,

MSD,

8;

V. Mazurov,
None;

L. Myasoutova,
None;

S. H. Park,
None;

Y. W. Song,
None;

R. Yao,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

D. Chitkara,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

N. Vastesaeger,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-open-label-study-of-maintenance-of-partial-remission-with-naproxen-vs-no-treatment-results-of-the-infliximab-as-first-line-therapy-in-patients-with-early-active-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology