ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 539

A Randomized Double-Blind Study Comparing Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of ABP 798 with Rituximab in Subjects with Moderate to Severe RA

Gerd Burmester1, Stanley Cohen 2, David Chien 3, Vincent Chow 3 and Zhiying Pan 3, 1Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 3Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biosimilars and ABP 798, rheumatoid arthritis, Rituximab, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Novel Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: ABP 798 is being developed as a biosimilar to rituximab, a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody that is approved in the US and EU for treatment of moderate-to-severe RA (US), severe RA (EU), non‑Hodgkin’s lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis, and moderate-to-severe pemphigus vulgaris (only US). A phase 1‑phase 3 study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and efficacy of ABP 798 in comparison with rituximab reference product (RP) in patients with moderate-to-severe RA. Here, we report the results of PK and PD similarity of ABP 798 versus rituximab RP.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study conducted in adult subjects with moderate-to-severe RA who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to other DMARDs. Subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 2 IV infusions of 1000 mg, 2 weeks apart of first dose of either ABP 798, rituximab RP sourced from the US (rituximab US), or rituximab RP sourced from the EU (rituximab EU). After Week 24, subjects continued treatment with ABP 798 or rituximab EU. The primary endpoint was area under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC] from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUCinf] and the maximum observed serum concentration [Cmax2] following the 2nd infusion of 1st dose; secondary PK endpoints were AUC from time 0 on Day 1 prior to the 1st infusion of the 1st dose to 14 days post-dose (AUC0-14 day), AUC from time 0 to week 12 (AUC0-12 wk), and Cmax1 following the 1st infusion of the 1st dose. The PD was evaluated based on the percent of subjects with complete depletion in CD19+ cell count from Day 1 to Day 3.

Results: A total of 311 subjects were randomized (ABP 798, n=104; rituximab EU, n=104; rituximab US, n=103); all subjects were treated with at least one infusion of investigational product. For the primary PK endpoints, the study established PK similarity between ABP 798, rituximab (US) and rituximab (EU) based on 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the adjusted geometric mean ratio (GMR) for AUCinf and Cmax2 following the 2nd infusion of 1st dose being within prespecified equivalence margin of 0.8 and 1.25. PK similarity was also established between rituximab US and rituximab EU for AUCinf and Cmax2 following the 2nd infusion of 1st dose. In addition, 90% CIs for the GMR for the secondary PK parameters (AUC0-14 day, AUC0-12 wk, and Cmax1 following the 1st infusion of the 1st dose) were also within the (0.8, 1.25) margin, supporting PK similarity. PD effects of complete CD19+ B-cell depletion were similar between ABP 798 and rituximab RP arms, with 92/97 (94.8%), 93/96 (96.9%), and 90/97 (92.8%) subjects showing complete B-cell depletion in ABP 798, rituximab EU, and rituximab US arms, respectively.

Conclusion: Results of this study demonstrated PK similarity of ABP 798 to rituximab RP in subjects with moderate-to-severe RA. The PD of ABP 798 and rituximab RP were also found to be similar.


Disclosure: G. Burmester, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma., 5, 8, AbbVie Inc., 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Gilead, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Merck Shar & Dohme, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Union Chimique Belge, 2, 5, 8; S. Cohen, AbbVie, 2, 5, Abbvie, 5, Amgen, 5, Amgen Inc., 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Biogen-IDEC, 2, 5, Bristol Meyer Squibb, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Merck, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5; D. Chien, Amgen, 1, 3; V. Chow, Amgen, 1, 3; Z. Pan, Amgen, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Burmester G, Cohen S, Chien D, Chow V, Pan Z. A Randomized Double-Blind Study Comparing Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of ABP 798 with Rituximab in Subjects with Moderate to Severe RA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-double-blind-study-comparing-pharmacokinetics-pk-and-pharmacodynamics-pd-of-abp-798-with-rituximab-in-subjects-with-moderate-to-severe-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-double-blind-study-comparing-pharmacokinetics-pk-and-pharmacodynamics-pd-of-abp-798-with-rituximab-in-subjects-with-moderate-to-severe-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology