ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0324

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single Injection, 52-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Intra-articular Injection (IAI) of CNTX-4975-05 (CNTX) in Subjects with Chronic, Moderate-to-severe Osteoarthritis Knee Pain (OAKP) – Study 301

Randall Stevens, James N Campbell, Colleen Newman and James Connolly, Centrexion Therapeutics Corporation, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0308–0324) Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: 30+ million US adults have OAKP. After years of using NSAIDs and other conservative measures many patients remain with OAKP. CNTX is a 1 mg dose of capsaicin for IAI to reduce OAKP.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week study with 325 subjects dosed, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single IAI (at Day 1) of 1.0 mg of CNTX, compared with placebo, in subjects (both sexes) with chronic, moderate-to-severe index OAKP (MSIOAKP). Subjects were allowed specific OAKP concomitant and rescue medications during the study.

Subjects with MSIOAKP using a numeric pain rating scale between 5-9 (NPRS [0 – 10; 0 = no pain, 10 worst pain possible]), Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 2-4 (0-4, Normal to severe by radiographs), and met knee OA (KOA) diagnostic criteria, were blindly randomized on Day 1 to a single IAI of capsaicin or placebo (3:2) into the most painful knee (index). NPRS at Week 12 was the primary outcome measure, with supporting data from the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC; A=pain, B= knee stiffness, C= function) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC; 0-7 scale). Radiographic data was taken of both knees.

Key safety included physical exams, vital signs, ECGs, labs, and fixed flexion radiographs of both knees at Screening, Weeks 12 and 52.

Results: 325 subjects received 1 dose of study drug (136 placebo, 189 CNTX); 262 randomized subjects completed; 70 subjects discontinued (DC) early. Reported reasons for study DC were subject withdrawal (7.2%), lost to follow-up (5.1%), and other (2.1%). 15 (4.5%) subjects DC prior to Week 12. Subjects: Mean age 61.8 years (range = 40-85 years), 63.4% female, 81.5% -not Hispanic or Latino; 65.5% Caucasian and 23.4% Back/African American.

Mean index knee baseline NPRS was 7.07, WOMAC A (0-50 scale; 0 = severe pain) 31.45, WOMAC B (0-20 scale) and WOMAC C (0-170) 13.26 and 106.99, respectively.

The least squares (LS) mean reduction in the average weekly pain with walking NPRS (0-10) score for the index knee was greater in the CNTX group than in the placebo group (−3.17 vs −2.84, respectively; p = 0.1904). However, the study failed to meet the primary efficacy endpoint. The WOMAC A, B and C subscales, the mean changes from study baseline were numerically better at nearly all visits through Week 26, and usually better to Week 52 for CNTX relative to placebo. Further, a greater proportion of subjects in the CNTX group were considered PGIC responders at Week 12 and beyond -(Table 1 and Figure 1).WOMAC A (pain) for CNTX was significantly (p< 0.05) improved over placebo at week 12. Overall safety was acceptable and CNTX after treatment Day 1, where there was more transient post injection pain in the CNTX group. Knee radiographs (masked central reading) from Baseline to Week 52 showed no difference in KOA progression between placebo and CNTX, with no rapidly progressive osteoarthritis.

Conclusion: The study did not meet the primary endpoint, though analgesic efficacy through Week 26 in CNTX was numerically superior to placebo. Improvement in WOMAC A at 12 weeks was significantly greater for CNTX compared to placebo CNTX safety was acceptable.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: R. Stevens: Centrexion Therapeutics Corporation, 3; J. Campbell: None; C. Newman: Centrexion Therapeutics Corp, 3; J. Connolly: Centrexion Therapeutics Corporation, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stevens R, Campbell J, Newman C, Connolly J. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single Injection, 52-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Intra-articular Injection (IAI) of CNTX-4975-05 (CNTX) in Subjects with Chronic, Moderate-to-severe Osteoarthritis Knee Pain (OAKP) – Study 301 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-single-injection-52-week-study-to-evaluate-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-an-intra-articular-injection-iai-of-cntx-4975-05-cntx-in-subjects-with-chroni/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-single-injection-52-week-study-to-evaluate-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-an-intra-articular-injection-iai-of-cntx-4975-05-cntx-in-subjects-with-chroni/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology