ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2825

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Equivalence Trial Comparing the Etanercept Biosimilar, HD203, with Etanercept (Enbrel®), in Combination with Methotrexate (MTX) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Sang-Cheol Bae1, Jinseok Kim2, Jung-Yoon Choe3, Won Park4, So-Ra Lee5, Yongho Ahn6 and Yunjeong Seo7, 1Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, South Korea, 2Division of Rheumatology, Internal Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea, South Korea, 3Division of Rheumatology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea, 4Medicine/Rheumatology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, South Korea, 5Clinical Development/Regulatory Affairs, Hanwha Chemical, Seoul, South Korea, 6R&D Center, Hanwha Chemical, Daejeon, South Korea, 7Clinical Development, Hanwha Chemical, Seoul, South Korea

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biosimilarity, biosimilars, etanercept, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy V: Novel Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Late in Development

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Etanercept is a recombinant fusion protein that blocks TNF activity. HD203 is a biosimilar of etanercept. In a double-blind, randomized study in healthy volunteers, HD203 and a reference etanercept were comparable with regards to pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the equivalence in efficacy and to compare the safety of HD203 (biosimilar etanercept) and a reference etanercept, in combination with MTX in patients with RA. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01270997).

Methods

Patients (male or female aged ≥20 years) with active RA were randomly assigned (1:1) to
25 mg HD203 or reference etanercept, administered subcutaneously twice weekly with MTX for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ACR20 at week 24. Secondary endpoints included ACRn, change in DAS28, and EULAR response at week 24 and 48, safety and immunogenicity. Efficacy and safety were evaluated at screening, week 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Immunogenicity, efficacy and safety were also evaluated at week 36 and 48.

Results

In total, 294 patients were randomized: 147 to HD203 and 147 to reference etanercept. The proportion of patients achieving ACR20 at week 24 (primary endpoint) was not significantly different for HD203 and reference etanercept (Table) and equivalence in efficacy was demonstrated within predefined margins. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences between proportions achieving ACR20 at weeks 12 and 48. Similar trends were seen for ACR50 and ACR70, however the proportion of patients achieving ACR50 at week 24 and 48 was higher with HD203 than with reference etanercept. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for ACRn, change in DAS28, and EULAR response at week 24 and 48.

Table: Proportion of patients achieving ACR20 at week 24 and week 48

 

HD203

Reference etanercept

Difference (95% CI)

P-value

24-week PPS

83.48% (96/115)

81.36% (96/118)

2.12 (–7.65,11.89)

0.6706†

FAS

79.10% (106/134)

75.56% (102/135)

3.55 (–6.45,13.55)

0.4870†

48-week PPS

86.27% (88/102)

81.90% (86/105)

4.37 (–5.57,14.31)

0.3905†

CI, confidence interval; PPS, per-protocol set; FAS, full analysis set; †Pearson’s chi-square test

Analysis of the safety set (HD203, n=147; reference etanercept, n=146) revealed no statistically significant difference in the number of treatment-emergent (all-causality) adverse events (AEs): HD203 76.87% vs. reference etanercept 78.08% (p=0.8040). Furthermore, no statistically significant differences between HD203 and reference etanercept were observed with regards to adverse drug reactions, serious AEs, or discontinuations due to AEs. No unexpected AEs were observed, and few patients tested positive for anti-drug antibodies.

Conclusion

The study met the primary endpoint of demonstrating equivalence in efficacy of HD203 compared with a reference etanercept. HD203 was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to that of the reference etanercept in this population of Korean patients with RA.


Disclosure:

S. C. Bae,

Research grants from Abbott Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, and Pfizer,

2,

Consulting fees from Pfizer, Hanwha Chemical, and Merck Serono,

5;

J. Kim,
None;

J. Y. Choe,
None;

W. Park,
None;

S. R. Lee,

Employee of Hanwha Chemical,

3;

Y. Ahn,

Employee of Hanwha Chemical,

3;

Y. Seo,

Employee of Hanwha Chemical,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-double-blind-phase-3-equivalence-trial-comparing-the-etanercept-biosimilar-hd203-with-etanercept-enbrel-in-combination-with-methotrexate-mtx-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-art/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology