ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1981

A Qualitative Analysis of Methotrexate Injection Videos on Youtube

Rebekah Rittberg1, Tharindri Dissanayake2 and Steven J. Katz3, 1University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 3Rheumatology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Education, methotrexate (MTX), patient, patient engagement, quality of care and website

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Education (ACR)

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the most commonly prescribed disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis. While data suggests subcutaneously administered methotrexate is more efficacious, there are many potential patient barriers to its use.  Video assisted teaching has been shown to be an effective supplementary method for subcutaneous MTX education. This review evaluates the quality of video resources available for patients on YouTube for learning to self-administer subcutaneous MTX. 

Methods:

Using the search term “Methotrexate injection” on YouTube, 2 independent clinical reviewers in 2 different geographic locations analyzed the first 3 pages of search results (60 videos).  Discrepancies were evaluated and resolved by a 3rd independent reviewer.  Source and search rank of videos, audience views video duration and time since video was uploaded to YouTube were recorded.  Videos were classified as useful, misleading or a personal patient view. Videos were rated for reliability using the DISCERN reliability tool (0-5, 5 being the most reliable), comprehensiveness (0-4; 1 point each as follows: needle preparation, MTX withdrawal, injection demonstration, needle disposal) & global quality scale (GQS; 1=poor video quality, 5= excellent video quality). Reasons for misleading videos were documented, and personal patient view videos were recorded as being either positive or negative towards MTX injection. 

Results:

A total of 51 English videos overlapped between the two geographic locations; 10 videos were classified as useful (19.6%), 14 as misleading (27.5%) & 27 as personal patient view (52.9%). Total views of videos were 161,028: 19.2% useful videos, 72.8% personal patient view videos, & 8.0% misleading videos. Mean GQS was 4.2 (± 1.0) for useful videos, 1.6 (± 1.1) for misleading videos & 2.0 (± 0.9) for personal patient videos (p <0.0001). Mean reliability was 3.3 (± 0.6) for useful videos, 0.9 (± 1.2) for misleading videos, & 1.0 (± 0.7) for personal patient videos (p <0.0001). Comprehensiveness was 2.2 (± 1.9) for useful videos, 0.1 (± 0.3) for misleading videos, & 1.5 (± 1.5) for personal patient view videos (p = 0.0027). Of the personal patient view videos, 77.8% were positive, & 22.2% were negative.  No significant correlation was found between the number of video views and quality of the video. The most common reason for a video being misleading was video content being unrelated to MTX injection. Of the 10 videos (19.6%) from university or professional organizations, 80% were useful and 20% misleading, while 72.7% of the 11 medical advertisements/for-profit organizations videos were misleading. 

Conclusion: A qualitative review of MTX injection videos posted on YouTube shows a minority of useful videos for MTX injection, with the majority of viewers watching patient created videos.  While many of these demonstrate MTX injection positively, this does not necessarily correlate with appropriate and safe technique.  While web video may be an additional educational tool available for patients, clinicians need to be familiar with specific resources to help guide and educate their patients to ensure best outcomes.


Disclosure:

R. Rittberg,
None;

T. Dissanayake,
None;

S. J. Katz,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-qualitative-analysis-of-methotrexate-injection-videos-on-youtube/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology