ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 99

A Pilot Study of the Use of a Validated Gout Script Concordance Test Assessment in an Interdisciplinary Musculoskeletal Education Program

Bernadette C. Siaton1, Andrea Barker2 and Michael J. Battistone2, 1Rheumatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System and University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Assessment, gout and trainee

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Education Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: A validated script concordance assessment (SCT) for gout was created for use in the internal medicine residency program at the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC). The assessment demonstrated high reliability and large effect size in a population of 143 learners.1 The aim of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of using this tool with interprofessional, multilevel groups of learners at the Center of Excellence in MSK Care and Education (MSK COE) at the Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center (SLC VAMC), to inform full implementation of the SCT in July, 2017.

Methods: A convenience sample of 19 learners (14 students or trainees; 5 practicing primary care providers (PCPs)) participating in programs at the SLC VAMC MSK COE, were asked to complete the SCT before and after a didactic session on gout. They were then sent emails containing the URL to access the SCT before and after the didactic. Time to complete the survey was not provided during the course. SCT was scored using an aggregate scoring method based on the results of an expert panel. Average pre- and post-test scores were calculated. A one-way ANOVA was used to compare pre- and post-test scores.

Results: Nine learners (47%) completed both the pre- and post-didactic SCT. The maximum possible SCT score was 50.16 points. For reference, the average score of the expert panel was 40.65 (SD=1.72) points. The average pre- and post-test scores for the UMMC population were 31.32 (SD=3.12) points and 33.98 (SD=2.72) points, respectively. The average pre-test score for the SLC VAMC population was 29.71 (SD=5.08) points. The average post-test score was 32.04 (SD=2.73) points. SLC VAMC learners did not show a statistically significant increase in scores after didactics, p=0.243. Individual learner demographics, pre-test scores, and post-test scores are below.

Learner Type

Pre-test Score

Post-test Score

Nurse Practitioner Student

31.74

35.72

Physician Assistant Student

31.86

30.99

Medicine Resident

30.84

34.95

Medicine Resident

17.18

28.67

Medicine Resident

30.12

32.12

Physician

32.95

33.76

Nurse Practitioner

26.87

31.60

Physician

32.65

33.05

Nurse Practitioner

33.16

27.48

Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates feasibility of implementing a validated SCT to assess knowledge of gout in a different institution, across an interprofessional and multilevel group of learners. The response rate was low, indicating that different methods of interfacing with this instrument, including confirmation of participation, are needed with our learner groups. The larger pre-course variance, relative to the reference population, may reflect the comparative diversity of our learners, but the small sample size and response rate limit the validity of statistical inferences. We will continue to use the SCT assessment in the MSK Education Week curriculum and accrue additional learners in order to better understand its use as an assessment.

Reference: 1. Siaton BC, Clayton E, Kueider AM, Rietschel M. Use of Script Concordance Testing to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Web-Based Module on Gout: Three Years of Experience [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10).


Disclosure: B. C. Siaton, None; A. Barker, None; M. J. Battistone, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Siaton BC, Barker A, Battistone MJ. A Pilot Study of the Use of a Validated Gout Script Concordance Test Assessment in an Interdisciplinary Musculoskeletal Education Program [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-pilot-study-of-the-use-of-a-validated-gout-script-concordance-test-assessment-in-an-interdisciplinary-musculoskeletal-education-program/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-pilot-study-of-the-use-of-a-validated-gout-script-concordance-test-assessment-in-an-interdisciplinary-musculoskeletal-education-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology