ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L6

A PHASE 2, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PF-04171327 (1, 5, 10, 15 mg QD) Vs 5 and 10 Mg Prednisone QD or Placebo in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) over 8 Weeks Followed By a 4-Week Taper of Study Drug

Vibeke Strand1, Frank Buttgereit2, Dorothy McCabe3, Sheela Kolluri3, Brinda Tammara3, Ricardo Rojo3 and Judith Hey-Hadavi3,4, 1Biopharmaceutical Consultant, Portola Valley, CA, 2Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany, 3Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 4Pfizer Inc, NewYork, NY

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical, randomized trials and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: ACR Late-breaking Abstracts Session

Session Type: Late-Breaking Abstracts

Background/Purpose:

PF-04171327 is a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor (DAGR), a selective high-affinity partial agonist of the GR with potent anti-inflammatory activity at exposures that provide less undesirable effects on bone and glucose metabolism compared with prednisone (pred). The objectives of this study were to determine the DAGR doses at which there was sufficient efficacy at Week 8 compared with PBO and pred 10 mg QD; with comparable changes in bone biomarkers and glucose homeostasis compared with pred 5 mg QD. 

Methods:

A total of 323 adult patients with active RA (≥6 TJC and 6 SJC plus CRP ≥0.7 mg/dL) receiving MTX were evenly randomized to receive DAGR 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg, pred 5 or 10 mg, or PBO QD for 8 weeks followed by a 4-week taper, and an ACTH stimulation test at Week 13. Use of GCs within 6 weeks of screening was prohibited. Efficacy analyses included a 4-parameter Bayesian Emax model to characterize dose-response (D-R) at Week 8 for primary and secondary efficacy endpoints, ACR20 and DAS28-4(CRP), respectively.  In addition to the efficacy endpoints, bone formation (P1NP, osteocalcin) and resorption (uNTX/uCr, sCTX) biomarkers, fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c were collected at protocol specified time points and were analyzed using MMRM methods. AEs and safety laboratory tests were monitored throughout the study.

Results:

Based on ACR20 responses, DAGR 10 and 15 mg QD met criteria for superiority to PBO (by 20% with 80% confidence); and DAGR 15 mg QD met non-inferiority criteria (by a margin of 5% with 80% confidence) to pred 10 mg QD. DAS28-4(CRP) results were consistent with ACR20 results (Table 1). DAGR doses of 1, 5, 10 and 15 mg QD had effects on bone formation markers comparable to pred 5 mg QD; and had small decreases in HbA1c comparable to pred 5mg QD in these non-diabetic RA patients. No clear trends or dose-response were seen in the bone resorption markers. Prompt HPA axis recovery was evident at Week 13 in all patients.  All DAGR doses were well-tolerated and comparable to PBO and pred doses, with no safety signal identified.

Conclusion:

The aggregate efficacy analysis demonstrated that in RA patients both DAGR 10 and 15 mg QD have efficacy superior to PBO and comparable to pred 10 mg QD, with effects comparable to pred 5 mg QD on bone formation and glucose markers. All DAGR doses were safe and well-tolerated. Based on the results of this study, further evaluation of
PF-04171327 appears warranted.

 

69023a_Strand_ACR2014_1010_abstract_Table1.jpg

 


Disclosure:

V. Strand,

Idera,

5,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

5,

Regeneron,

5,

Lilly,

5,

MerckSerono,

5,

Sanofi-Genzyme,

5,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Takeda,

5,

Regeneron,

5,

Sanofi-Genzyme,

5,

UCB,

5,

Takeda,

5,

AbbVie,

5,

UCB,

5,

Abbvie,

9,

Amgen,

5,

Abbvie,

9,

Antera,

5,

Amgen,

9,

AstraZeneca,

5,

Anthera,

9,

Biogen Idec,

5,

AstraZeneca,

9,

Anthera,

9,

BMS,

5,

BiogenIdec,

9,

Genetech/Roche,

5,

BMS,

9,

AstraZeneca,

9,

GlaxoSmithKline,

5,

Genentech-Roche,

9,

Idera,

5,

GlaxoSmithKline,

9,

BiogenIdec,

9,

Idera,

9,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

5,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

9,

Lilly,

5,

Lilly,

9,

BMS,

9,

MerckSerono,

5,

MerckSerono,

9,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

5,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

9,

Genentech-Roche,

9,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

9,

Regeneron,

5,

Regeneron,

9,

Sanofi-Genzyme,

5,

GlaxoSmithKline,

9,

Sanofi-Genzyme,

9,

Takeda,

5,

Takeda,

9,

UCB,

5,

Idera,

9,

UCB,

9,

Abbvie,

9,

Amgen,

9,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

9,

Anthera,

9,

AstraZeneca,

9,

Lilly,

9,

BiogenIdec,

9,

BMS,

9,

MerckSerono,

9,

Genentech-Roche,

9,

GlaxoSmithKline,

9,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

9,

Idera,

9,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

9,

Pfizer Inc,

9,

Lilly,

9,

MerckSerono,

9,

Regeneron,

9,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

9,

Pfizer Inc,

9,

Sanofi-Genzyme,

9,

Regeneron,

9,

Takeda,

9,

Sanofi-Genzyme,

9,

Takeda,

9,

UCB,

9,

UCB,

9;

F. Buttgereit,

Pfizer Inc,

8,

Pfizer Inc,

6,

Pfizer Inc,

9;

D. McCabe,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

S. Kolluri,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

B. Tammara,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

R. Rojo,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

J. Hey-Hadavi,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-randomized-double-blind-comparison-of-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-pf-04171327-1-5-10-15-mg-qd-vs-5-and-10-mg-prednisone-qd-or-placebo-in-subjects-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-over-8/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology