ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 681

A Panel of Lupus Biomarkers for the Monitoring of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Performance Characteristics in Distinct SLE Cohorts

Joan T. Merrill1, Thierry Dervieux2, Jill P. Buyon3, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman4, Kenneth C. Kalunian5, Chaim Putterman6, John Conklin2, Richard Furie7 and Michelle Petri8, 1Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 2Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., Vista, CA, 3Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 4FSM, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 5Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 6Division of Rheumatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA, Bronx, NY, 7Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, 8Medicine (Rheumatology), Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MD, USA, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biomarkers, complement and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Disease Activity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I: Biomarkers and Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Antibody titers to double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and complement C3 and C4 proteins have clinical utility in the routine monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We evaluated the performance characteristics of antibody titers to C1q (anti-C1q), and C4d bound to erythrocytes (EC4d) as additional biomarker candidates in the monitoring of SLE disease activity.
Methods: SLE patients (total 124 patients, mean age 42 years, 97% females) were enrolled from three different cohorts. The first cohort enrolled 37 subjects, all selected for active disease in the presence of complement activation. The second and third cohorts enrolled 64 and 24 SLE subjects, respectively. Disease activity was assessed longitudinally using the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA) SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) without anti-dsDNA and complement components; this modification is referred to as the clinical SELENA-SLEDAI. Also, the Physician’s Global Assessment of disease activity (PGA: 0-3-point scale) was collected. Antibody titers, serum C3 and C4 levels were determined using standard immunoassays (low C3/C4 was defined as either C3 or C4 below normal range). EC4d levels were determined using quantitative flow cytometry and expressed as net mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). The relationships between fluctuations in SLE disease activity and biomarkers were analyzed using Spearman rank test and linear mixed effect models with the clinical SELENA-SLEDAI and PGA as the dependent variables and biomarkers as independent predictor of disease activity fluctuations (autoantibody titers and EC4d levels were log normalized for the analysis). Marginal R2 were calculated to evaluate the proportion of variance explained by independent variables.
Results: Overall, a total of 624 study visits were collected in the 124 patients. At baseline, both clinical SELENA-SLEDAI (average 6.0 points) and PGA scores (average 1.0 point) correlated with EC4d levels C3/C4 status, anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q titers (p<0.01). Linear mixed effect models revealed that changes in EC4d, C3/C4 anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q titers were all significantly associated with fluctuations in disease activity (p<0.01)(Table I). Of the 124 subjects, 97 of them presented with either chronically low C3/C4 (n=40) or normal C3/C4 status at all visits (n=57). In this subset, changes in EC4d levels were associated with fluctuations in clinical SELENA-SLEDAI (estimate 1.2±0.3, marginal R2=8%) and PGA (estimate 0.2±0.1, marginal R2=9%).
Conclusion: These data indicate that anti-dsDNA, antiC1q, low complement and EC4d are associated with disease fluctuations in SLE. EC4d correlates with disease activity among subjects with chronically low or normal complement.


Disclosure: J. T. Merrill, Exagen, 5; T. Dervieux, Exagen, 3; J. P. Buyon, Exagen, 2; R. Ramsey-Goldman, Exagen, 2; K. C. Kalunian, Exagen, 2,Exagen, 5; C. Putterman, Exagen, 2; J. Conklin, Exagen, 3; R. Furie, Exagen, 2; M. Petri, Exagen, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Merrill JT, Dervieux T, Buyon JP, Ramsey-Goldman R, Kalunian KC, Putterman C, Conklin J, Furie R, Petri M. A Panel of Lupus Biomarkers for the Monitoring of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Performance Characteristics in Distinct SLE Cohorts [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-panel-of-lupus-biomarkers-for-the-monitoring-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-performance-characteristics-in-distinct-sle-cohorts/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-panel-of-lupus-biomarkers-for-the-monitoring-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-performance-characteristics-in-distinct-sle-cohorts/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology