ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2410

A Novel Treatment Response Measure for SLE Clinical Trials (TRM-SLE): Selection of Domains and Candidate Measures

Kathryn Connelly1, Rachel Koelmeyer1, Darshini Ayton1, Lavanya Rajagopala2, Ambika Wahklu2, John May3, Raychel Barallon4, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake5, Laura Eades1, kate Gregory1 and Eric Morand6, and the TRM-SLE Taskforce, 1Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3Monash Medical Centre, Richmond, Victoria, Australia, 4Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 5Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 6School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: clinical trial, Outcome measures, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The success of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in SLE has been hampered by limitations of current outcome measures, contributing to negative or discordant trial outcomes. To address this, an international Treatment Response Measure for SLE (TRM-SLE) clinician-industry-patient taskforce is developing a new clinical outcome assessment (COA) specifically for use in SLE RCTs (1). The aim of the current study was to achieve consensus on domains of active SLE to include, then identify candidate domain measures that will define clinically meaningful improvement in the new instrument.

Methods: Representatives of key stakeholder groups participated in a modified Delphi study rating potential domains for inclusion, based on domain importance, and utility in an RCT context. Working groups were then established to address the measurement of each domain, comprising adult and paediatric expert clinicians (rheumatologists and relevant specialists), patients with lived experience of domain-specific disease activity, and industry representatives with trial and regulatory expertise. For each domain, working groups sought agreement on domain definition and scope, nominated candidate domain measures via an online process, then shortlisted measures via online consensus meetings, based on their suitability for the measurement goals of the project and RCT context.

Results: 131 experts (clinicians, patients and industry representatives) from six continents participated. The domains of alopecia, arthritis, haemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, mucosal ulcers, nephritis, rash and serositis met the pre-defined consensus threshold for inclusion. The definition and scope of each domain was established, with 100% agreement in each case, focusing on attribution to active SLE, reversibility, and impact on patients’ lives. A total of 391 nominations for candidate domain measures were received  across the eight domains, representing 183 unique suggestions (Table 1). Via online consensus meetings, candidate domain measures were shortlisted for each domain, including clinical and laboratory assessments and composite measures (Table 2).

Conclusion: Consensus was achieved across clinician, patient, and industry stakeholders on eight organ domains for inclusion in a new COA for SLE RCTs. To measure these domains, outcome assessments of domain-specific disease activity were shortlisted. Systematic literature reviews of their measurement properties and prior use in RCTs are currently underway. This will be followed by formal nominal group technique processes to reach consensus on each domain measure, assign scoring methods and set thresholds defining clinically meaningful outcomes that will then be integrated into a final COA that will proceed to validation studies.

1. Connelly K et. al. Nat Rev Rheum 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41584-023-00993-7

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Nominations for potential domain measures

Supporting image 2

Table 2: Domain definitions/scope and shortlisted measures of domain-specific activity that will be subject to systematic literature reviews to inform the final selection of measures via formal consensus methods


Disclosures: K. Connelly: AstraZeneca, 2; R. Koelmeyer: None; D. Ayton: None; L. Rajagopala: None; A. Wahklu: None; J. May: None; R. Barallon: None; R. Kandane-Rathnayake: GlaxoSmithKline(GSK), 5, Janssen, 5, Novartis, 5; L. Eades: None; k. Gregory: None; E. Morand: AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Dragonfly, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, EMD Serono, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, GSK, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, RemeGen, 2, Roche, 5, 6, Takeda, 2, 5, UCB, 5, Zenas, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Connelly K, Koelmeyer R, Ayton D, Rajagopala L, Wahklu A, May J, Barallon R, Kandane-Rathnayake R, Eades L, Gregory k, Morand E. A Novel Treatment Response Measure for SLE Clinical Trials (TRM-SLE): Selection of Domains and Candidate Measures [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-novel-treatment-response-measure-for-sle-clinical-trials-trm-sle-selection-of-domains-and-candidate-measures/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-novel-treatment-response-measure-for-sle-clinical-trials-trm-sle-selection-of-domains-and-candidate-measures/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology