ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2140

A Longitudinal Study of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Early RA Providing Direction for Future Clinical Treatment- Predict Study

Paul Bird1, David Nicholls2, Julien P. de Jager3, Hedley Griffiths4, Lynden Roberts5, Kathleen Tymms6, Jane Zochling7, Mark H. Arnold8, Geoffrey O. Littlejohn9 and OPAL Consortium10, 1Combined Rheumatology Practice, Sydney, Australia, 2Coast Joint Care, Maroochydore, Australia, 3Suite 2, Osler House, Southport, Australia, 4Barwon Rheumatology Service, Geelong, Australia, 5School of Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia, 6Canberra Rheumatology, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 7Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, 8Orthopaedic Arthritis Spec Ctr, Level 2 The Gallery, Chatswood, Australia, 9Rheumatology, Monash Medical Center, Melbourne, Australia, 10Melbourne, Australia

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, prognostic factors, remission and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects III: Infections/Risk Factors for Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis/Metrology/Classification/Biomarkers/Predictors of Rheumatolid Arthritis Activity & Severity

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Despite the conspicuous increase in available treatment for rheumatoid arthritis [RA], and the shift to early, more aggressive management, there is a paucity of reliable prognostic markers to assist in the stratification of therapy in individual patients.  As a result, individualized risk-adapted therapy for patients with RA remains a desirable, but elusive goal. The primary objective of this study was to assess the association between baseline clinical prognostic factors and subsequent DAS remission in early RA patients.

Methods: The study utilised point of care clinical software to collect data from 20 participating rheumatology treatment centres. Newly diagnosed RA patients over the age of 18 years treated at a participating clinic were eligible.  Patients were required to have attended the clinic on at least two occasions in 6 months and have at least two available DAS assessments. Clinical predictors of outcome were identified and the list was refined by consensus.  Data captured included baseline demographics, mode of disease onset, pattern of joint involvement at onset, smoking status, DAS, RF and CCP titre, time from onset of symptoms to presentation and disease activity at baseline. Statistical analysis utilized a univariate and multivariate logistic regression of DAS28ESR remission 12 months after the first assessment.

Results:

1,121 patients were included in the analysis (71% female, 29% male).  434 patients were RF positive, 265 CCP positive. Mean age 61.3 years (SD 13.4).

The strongest baseline predictors of DAS28ESR remission at 12 months were younger age, male and low disease activity at baseline. There was no statistically significant association between joint onset patterns, mode of onset, RF or CCP status and smoking status.

The association between DAS28ESR remission at 12 months and age was borderline significant. Odds ratio for age was 0.985 (95% CI = (0.969, 1.01)). For each additional decade of age, the odds of being in remission at 12 months decreased by 15% (p = 0.057)

For female patients the odds of being in remission at 12 months was 0.887;for male patients the odds of being in remission at 12 months was 2.00; therefore the odds of a male patient being in remission at 12 months was 2.256 times greater than those for female patients (OR 2.256, 95% CI = (1.384, 3.675), P<0.001.)).

For patients who were in remission at baseline the odds of being in remission at 12 months was 2.44; for patients who were not in remission at baseline the odds of being in remission at 12 months was 0.57; therefore the odds of a patient in remission at baseline being in remission at 12 months were 4.28 time greater than those patients not in remission at baseline (OR 4.28, 95% CI = (2.56, 7.17), P < 0.001.)).

Conclusion: The strongest baseline predictors of DAS remission at 12 months were younger age, low baseline disease activity and male gender. Traditional prognostic factors associated with outcome such as smoking and CCP status were not strong predictors of outcome at 12 months. The study identifies potential high-risk groups that may benefit from more frequent clinical assessment and therapy adjustment. The cohort will be followed over the next five years to provide data on long term outcome.


Disclosure:

P. Bird,
None;

D. Nicholls,
None;

J. P. de Jager,
None;

H. Griffiths,
None;

L. Roberts,
None;

K. Tymms,
None;

J. Zochling,
None;

M. H. Arnold,
None;

G. O. Littlejohn,
None;

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-longitudinal-study-of-prognostic-factors-in-patients-with-early-ra-providing-direction-for-future-clinical-treatment-predict-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology