ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 299

A Comparison of Persistent Versus Limited Frequent Emergency Department (ED) Utilization Among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Patients

Judith Lin1, Jiha Lee2, Lisa Gale Suter3 and Liana Fraenkel4, 1Rheumatology, Yale Univeristy School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 2Rheumatology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 3Rheumatology, Rheumatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, New Haven, CT, 4Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Health Care and SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Health Services Research Poster I – ACR/ARHP

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with SLE often require additional medical management outside of the outpatient setting from ED visits to hospital admissions. Previous studies in the general population showed that those who frequently visit the ED mostly do so over a limited time period (<12 months); however, a subgroup are persistent frequent ED users over years. We examined whether persistent and limited ED utilization in SLE patients are associated with patient characteristics, SLE history, long term opioid therapy (LTOT), and general health status.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of SLE patients who frequented the ED for ≥3 visits in a calendar year from 2013-2016. Limited use was defined as meeting criteria for frequent ED use for 1 out of the 4 years. Persistent users met these criteria for at least 2 out of the 4 years, consecutive or non-consecutive during the study period.  Patient demographics, medical history, and ED encounter information were collected through in-depth electronic health record review.  Each ED encounter was categorized into the following groups; SLE-, infection-, pain-related, or “other”. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with frequent ED utilization.

Results: We identified 52 limited users who had 335 ED encounters, and 77 persistent users who had 1143 encounters; average age 41.5 (SD 15.6), 116 (90%) female, 76 (58%) with Medicaid insurance coverage, and 77 (60%) African American, 27 (21%) Caucasian, and 25 (19%) Hispanic/Latino. Persistent users had more than twice the average number of ED visits (mean 14.8, SD 8.8) compared to limited users (mean 6.4, SD 2.0), and had more ED-initiated hospitalizations (49% vs 40%, respectively). Pain-related ED visits were more common among persistent users (32%) than limited users (18%) (see Figure). In multivariate analysis, persistently frequent ED users were more likely to be African American, have Medicare insurance coverage and be on LTOT, but less likely to be on other DMARD, than their respective counterparts who are limited frequent ED users (see Table).

Conclusion:   Among SLE patients who persistently frequent the ED, pain is a major cause for both ED utilization and ED-initiated hospitalizations. This group of SLE patients who account for a high volume of healthcare resource utilization may be amenable to targeted interventions to improve pain management and care coordination in the outpatient setting. Further research is needed to improve quality of care and reduce healthcare resource utilization among SLE patients who frequently utilize the ED.


Disclosure: J. Lin, None; J. Lee, None; L. G. Suter, None; L. Fraenkel, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lin J, Lee J, Suter LG, Fraenkel L. A Comparison of Persistent Versus Limited Frequent Emergency Department (ED) Utilization Among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-comparison-of-persistent-versus-limited-frequent-emergency-department-ed-utilization-among-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-comparison-of-persistent-versus-limited-frequent-emergency-department-ed-utilization-among-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology