ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1829

Cost of Etanercept, Adalimumab, and Infliximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Employer Provided Health Insurance

Machaon Bonafede1, Crystal Watson2, George Joseph2, Nicole Princic1 and David J. Harrison2, 1Thomson Reuters Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, 2Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, Economics, etanercept, infliximab and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services Research: Rheumatic Disease Pharmacoepidemiology

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors (TNFi) are the mainstay of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with moderate to severe disease. The three most commonly used agents, etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), and infliximab (INF), differ with respect to frequency of administration, dosing and the approved dose ranges.  In addition, INF is administered as infusion by a healthcare professional, whereas ETN and ADA are self-administered subcutaneously. The goal of this study was to determine the annual TNFi drug and administration costs for RA patients on ETN, ADA, or INF.

Methods: The MarketScan Commercial Database was used to identify adult patients (18-64 years) with ≥1 claim for ETN, ADA, or INF between February 1, 2008 and July 5, 2010.  Patients were required to have a diagnosis of RA and excluded if they had diagnoses for other conditions treated with TNFi (psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, or juvenile idiopathic arthritis) in the six months prior to the start of their index TNFi.  The patient’s first TNFi claim after 6-months of continuous enrollment was their index claim and defined their index TNFi. If they had at least one claim for the same agent in the 6-months pre-index they were defined as “continuing”, otherwise they were “new”.  Patients were followed for 1 year and the cost of all TNFi used in that year were attributed to their index TNFi.  Cost of TNFi was calculated based on total dose and the March 2012 wholesale acquisition costs and the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule was used to determine TNFi drug administration costs.

Results: There were 7,003 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.  ETN was the most frequently used index TNFi agent (3,159) followed by ADA, 2,057 and INF 1,787.  The mean age was similar across agents, (51.1 ETN and ADA and 52.0 INF).  The majority of patients (77.8%) were female and 76.2% of the patients were continuing on therapy. Preferred provider organizations were the most common insurance type, 58.8%-63.2%. Across new and continuing patients combined, the annual TNFi cost per patient was highest for INF ($27,366), followed by $20,594 for ADA and $17,753 for ETN. The costs among continuing patients were higher than the new patients but the trends were similar across both groups. 

Conclusion: TNFi costs differ meaningfully by index TNFi agent in the patients with employer provided health insurance. ADA cost 16% more than ETN and INF cost 54% more than ETN across new and continuing patients combined.  The difference was greater in continuing compared to new patients.


Disclosure:

M. Bonafede,
None;

C. Watson,

Amgen Inc.,

1;

G. Joseph,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

N. Princic,
None;

D. J. Harrison,

Amgen,

1,

Amgen,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cost-of-etanercept-adalimumab-and-infliximab-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-with-employer-provided-health-insurance/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology