ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 589

Patients with Nr-Axspa Show a Statistically Higher Disease Burden in Clinical Practice Compared with Patients with Radiographic Axial Spa

Lennart TH Jacobsson1, Tomas Husmark2, Elke Theander3, Kenneth Henriksson4, Katharina Büsch5 and Martin Johansson5, 1Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2Rheumatology, Falu Hospital, Falun, Sweden, 3Skane University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, 4Rheumatology city clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden, 5AbbVie AB, Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), axial spondyloarthritis, clinical practice and non-radiographic, Disease Activity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose The ASAS axial SpA classification criteria was published in 2009 but so far there has been limited research on axial SpA patients in clinical practice. There is no diagnose code for non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-axSpA) and it is unclear which diagnosis these patients receive in clinical practice. Characterization of nr-axSpA patients in clinical practice is lacking in comparison with radiographic axial SpA (rad-axSpA). The aim of this study was to characterize patients with axial SpA in clinical practice and to investigate similarities/differences between radiographic and non-radiographic axial SpA.

Methods This is a prospective, cross-sectional, multi-center cohort study from Sweden. SpA patients (diagnosed with Psoriatic Spondylitis (M07.2), Ankylosing Spondylitis (M45), Spinal entesopathy (M46.0), Sacroiliitis, not elsewhere classified (M46.1), Other specified inflammatory spondylopathies (M46.8), or Inflammatory spondylopathy, unspecified (M46.9)) were consecutively recruited from the clinical settings of the participating study centers. Patients were followed for three months via an online questionnaire. At baseline, the rheumatologist assessed the ASAS axial SpA criteria and registered information on disease history, extra articular manifestations, and treatments. The patients answered online questionnaires capturing patient demographics, disease activity and function (BASDAI, BASFI, HAQ-S, etc.), QoL (EQ-5D, AS-QoL), health care resource use, and work ability (WPAI). P-values, unadjusted for covariates, were calculated using chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables

Results 251 patients were included of whom 197 (78%) were classified as axial SpA. Of those, 125 (63%) were classified as rad-axSpA and 72 (37%) were classified as nr-axSpA according to the ASAS axial SpA criteria. The nr-axSpA patients were diagnosed with AS (35%), other specific inflammatory spondylopathies (31%), inflammatory spondylopathy unspecified (19%), psoriatic spondylitis (11%), and sacroilitis, not elsewhere classified (4%). Time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 9.0 (8.4) years for rad-axSpA and 6.7 (7.1) years for nr-axSpA. The nr-axSpA patients showed a higher disease burden compared with rad-axSpA patients, e.g. higher BASDAI (4.1 vs. 2.7), VAS global (4.3 vs. 2.9), VAS pain (4.4 vs. 2.9), and ASDAS(CRP) (2.3 vs. 1.9)(Table).

Variable

Radiographic Axial SpA

N = 125

Non-radiographic Axial SpA

N = 72

p-value

BASDAI, mean, n (%)

2.7 (65)

4.1 (61)

<0.001

BASDAI >4.0, %, n (%)

28 (65)

55 (61)

0.004

BASFI, mean, n (%)

2.5 (65)

3.0 (61)

0.29

VAS global, mean, n (%)

2.9 (65)

4.3 (61)

0.006

VAS pain, mean, n (%)

2.9 (65)

4.4 (61)

0.003

ASDAS CRP, mean, n (%)

1.9 (58)

2.3 (57)

0.03

ASDAS ESR, mean, n (%)

1.8 (58)

2.3 (56)

0.007

Current NSAID use, %, n (%)

60 (100)

71 (100)

0.13

Current MTX or SSZ use, %, n (%)

28 (100)

22 (100)

0.37

Current anti-TNF use, %, n (%)

50 (100)

40 (100)

0.17

Conclusion In this study, from Swedish clinical practice, we included patients from rheumatology clinics with pre-specified diagnoses most likely to be classified as axial SpA. The results show that the nr-axSpA patients have a statistically higher burden of disease than patients with rad-axSpA.


Disclosure:

L. T. Jacobsson,

AbbVie, Pfizer, UCB,

5;

T. Husmark,

AbbVie,

5;

E. Theander,

AbbVie,

5;

K. Henriksson,

AbbVie,

5;

K. Büsch,

AbbVie,

1,

AbbVie,

3;

M. Johansson,

AbbVie,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-with-nr-axspa-show-a-statistically-higher-disease-burden-in-clinical-practice-compared-with-patients-with-radiographic-axial-spa/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology