ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1540

Treatment Patterns of Biologics Used in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis in the US Veterans Population

Brian Sauer1, Chia-Chen Teng1, Tao He1, Jianwei Leng2, Chao-Chin Lu1, Neel Shah3, David J. Harrison4, Derek Tang4 and Grant W. Cannon5, 1Salt Lake City VA and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Salt Lake City VA and University of Utah, Salt Lake Citty, UT, 31 Amgen Center Dr, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 4Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 5Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City VA and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Biologic agents, Compliance, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Novel therapies, Biosimilars, Strategies and Mechanisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Biologics used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), including tumor necrosis factor blockers, are a key area of focus for Veterans Affairs (VA) Pharmacy Benefits Programs. This study describes treatment patterns with etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), and infliximab (IFX) in US veterans with RA or AS during the first year of treatment.

Methods: National VA pharmacy, administrative, and clinical databases were used for this analysis. Eligibility criteria included ≥1 claim for ETN, ADA, or IFX from Jan 1, 2008 to Dec 31, 2011 preceded by at least 180 days of enrollment in the VA. The first drug and date that met this criterion was the index drug and date. Patients had to be ≥ 18 years of age on their index date; have ≥360 days of enrollment following their index date; and have ≥1 claim with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis of RA or AS prior to or within 30-days after their index date. Patients with a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, or chronic lymphocytic lymphoma, prior to or within 30-days of their index date; a claim for their index biologic prior to their index date; who used a biologic prior to its receiving approval for that condition; or who had implausible dosing (≥200% of the maximum labeled dose) were excluded.

Treatment patterns were classified based on whether or not patients were persistent on their index agent for the 360 days after their index date. Non-persistence was defined as a ≥45 day gap in days of supply on their index agent or a claim for a non-index biologic. Non-persistent patients were further categorized based on the first observed event after non-persistence: switching, a claim for a biologic other than their index biologic; restarting, another claim for their index biologic after the ≥45 day gap, or discontinued no subsequent claims for any biologic following the gap.

Results: ETN, ADA, and IFX were the index biologic for 2,109, 2,035, and 263 veterans with RA and 286, 422, and 46 veterans with AS. Approximately half of all patients with RA were persistent on therapy for the entire year; 49.3% of ETN, 51.4% of ADA, and 52.5% of IFX. Persistence in AS was lower (ETN, 42.0% and ADA, 40.0%), but higher with INF, 56.4%. In both RA and AS, switching rates were numerically higher in IFX users (RA: 18.6%; AS: 15.2%) compared with ETN (RA: 11.8%, AS: 10.1%) and ADA (RA: 10.3%, AS: 12.8%). Restarting was more common with ETN and ADA than INF in both RA and AS. Discontinuation rates were similar (11.9-14.0%) across agents in both RA and AS.

Conclusion: Overall, persistence during the first year of therapy for RA and AS was relatively low, 40.0-56.5%. Gaps in therapy occurred in 26.5-34.6% of patients taking self-injected agents, but only 15.5-16.3% of patients taking INF. More work is needed to understand the reasons for non-persistence in this population.

 

Diseases and Treatment Patterns

Etanercept

Adalimumab

Infliximab

%

95% CI

%

95% CI

%

95% CI

RA

All

N=2,109

N=2,035

N=263

 Persistent

49.3%

47.2-51.4%

51.4%

49.2-53.6%

52.5%

46.4-58.5%

 Non-Persistent

50.7%

48.6-52.8%

48.6%

46.4-50.8%

47.5%

41.5-53.6%

 Discontinued   Biologic Therapy

12.0%

10.7-13.4%

11.9%

10.5-13.3%

12.5%

 8.5-16.6%

 Restart After   a ≥ 45 day gap

26.9%

25.0-28.8%

26.4%

24.5-28.3%

16.3%

11.9-20.8%

 Switch Biologic   Therapy

11.8%

10.4-13.1%

10.3%

 9.0-11.6%

18.6%

13.9-23.3%

AS

All

286

N=422

N=46

 Persistent

42.0%

36.2-47.7%

40.0%

35.4-44.7%

56.5%

42.2-70.8%

 Non-Persistent

58.0%

52.3-63.8%

60.0%

55.3-64.6%

43.5%

29.2-57.8%

 Discontinued   Biologic Therapy

13.3%

 9.4-17.2%

14.0%

10.7-17.3%

13.0%

 3.3-22.8%

 Restart After   a ≥ 45 day gap

34.6%

29.1-40.1%

33.2%

28.7-37.7%

15.2%

 4.8-25.6%

 Switch Biologic   Therapy

10.1%

 6.6-13.6%

12.8%

 9.6-16.0%

15.2%

 4.8-25.6%


Disclosure:

B. Sauer,

Amgen Inc.,

2;

C. C. Teng,

Amgen Inc.,

2;

T. He,

Amgen Inc.,

2;

J. Leng,

Amgen Inc.,

2;

C. C. Lu,

Amgen Inc.,

2;

N. Shah,

Amgen,

3,

Amgen,

1;

D. J. Harrison,

Amgen,

3,

Amgen,

1;

D. Tang,

Amgen,

3,

Amgen,

1;

G. W. Cannon,

Amgen Inc.,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-patterns-of-biologics-used-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-ankylosing-spondylitis-in-the-us-veterans-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology