ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2243

Comparison Between Two Diclofenac Diethylamine Gel Formulations, 1.16% Vs 2.32%: Is It Only Increasing the Strength of the Active Ingredient Enough?

Giuseppa Quartarone1 and Nathalie Hasler-Nguyen2, 1Medical Affairs, Novartis CH R&D OU Italy Greece, Milan, Italy, 2Pre-Cinical Development, Novartis CH Global R&D, Nyon, Switzerland

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, pain and pain management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects: Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Topically applied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can produce clinically effective drug concentrations at a peripheral site, but with low systemic concentrations and thus a lower risk of AEs. Various factors influence penetration and absorption of topical NSAIDs such as chemical properties of adjuvants included in the formulation and inter-individual variability in skin absorption. Modulating skin permeation is a pivotal factor in the development of new formulations as well as their posology and duration of therapeutic effect. Diclofenac diethylamine (DDEA) 1.16% gel (Voltaren® EmulgelTM [VEG 1%], Novartis Consumer Health, Nyon Switzerland) is used topically to relief pain and inflammation; it is applied to the affected site 3 or 4 times daily. We compared the in vitro skin permeation of VEG 1% with a new double-strength formulation of DDEA 2.32% [VEG 2%] including different doses of a permeation enhancer (PE) to assess the hypothesis of increased skin permeation that may result in delivering higher drug amounts to target tissues  when applied every 12h.

Methods

In vitro skin penetration studies were performed at 35°C in glass Franz static diffusion cells (Bernard Gallas, Antibes, F; 1.54 cm2) using human skin. Samples of donor abdomens were obtained from the NDRI Institute (USA) and the WHRTB Institute (HU) and kept frozen at –80°C until use. The comparison of in vitro skin permeation of VEG 1% vs VEG 2% was performed. Then VEG 1% was tested against VEG 2% containing low (0.5%), medium (0.75%) and high (1.0%) amounts of a permeation enhancer. All samples were applied at 20 mg/cm2 in a single dose, equivalent to the maximum daily dose of 4 applications of 5 mg/cm2 under in use conditions.

Results

Addition of the PE at the VEG 2% gel resulted at a dose-dependent (up to 3-fold) increase in diclofenac’s skin permeation (Fig. 1). Medium and high PE concentration resulted in similar cumulative permeation.

Conclusion

Addition of PE to VEG 2% resulted in an up to 3-fold increased diclofenac skin permeation which correlated with the PE dose concentrations. The new gel is expected to have a lasting effect, e.g. up to 12h, potentially attributed to the release of a higher amount of drug at the application site as confirmed in a RCT (Predel 2012), where 2 daily doses significantly reduced pain and improved joint function vs placebo. This could be useful when treating flares of peripheral joint conditions such as OA.


Disclosure:

G. Quartarone,
None;

N. Hasler-Nguyen,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-between-two-diclofenac-diethylamine-gel-formulations-1-16-vs-2-32-is-it-only-increasing-the-strength-of-the-active-ingredient-enough/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology