ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2404

RA Patients with Inadequate Response to Oral MTX Maintain Satisfactory Disease Control and Durable Long-Term Response When Switched to SC MTX Monotherapy

Anthony Hammond1 and Michael Batley2, 1Rheumatology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent TN13 2JD, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells Hospital, Kent, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical, Disease Activity, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy, but many patients do not achieve adequate response to oral therapy for reasons of tolerability or efficacy.1,2 Subcutaneous (SC) MTX should be considered for RA patients who have an unsatisfactory response to oral MTX.3 In this analysis, RA patients switched from oral MTX to SC MTX monotherapy were evaluated to understand durability of response and disease control.

 Methods:  A prospective analysis of retrospective RA patient data collected from 2003-2011 at single site in the U.K.4 was performed.  Per institutional practice, incremental oral MTX dose increase was followed by a switch to SC MTX. Folic acid (5-15 mg) was given 1 day after SC MTX treatment as a matter of routine practice. Mean duration on SC MTX monotherapy following switch from oral MTX was documented via patient record review.

 Results: 112 RA patients were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 60.9 yrs (range 26-83 yrs) and mean disease duration was 8.3 years (range 0.5-46 yrs). 49 (44%) patients with an inadequate response to oral MTX for reasons of tolerability or efficacy were switched to SC MTX monotherapy and included in this analysis. (Table 1) 20 patients (41%) switched from oral MTX to SC MTX for reasons of tolerability. Amongst these: Mean DAS28 improved by 18% (-1.05), patients remained on SC MTX monotherapy for a mean of 28.6 months before additional treatment was added and 40% (8) achieved low disease activity (LDA) of DAS28 ≤3.2; 29 patients (59%) switched for reasons of efficacy. Amongst these: Mean DAS28 scores improved 25% (-1.26), patients remained on SC MTX monotherapy for a mean of 34.58 months before addition of other therapies and 24% (7) achieved LDA.

Conclusion: In this single-center analysis, RA patients with an inadequate response to oral MTX for reasons of efficacy and/or tolerability maintained satisfactory disease control and durable, long-term response when switched to SC MTX monotherapy.

Table 1.

Evaluable

(n=49)

n

Pre-

Switch

DAS 28

Post-

Switch

DAS 28

DAS28 Change

(Value, %)

Mean Duration on

SC MTX monotherapy

(months)

LDA

(≤3.2)

(n,%)

Remission

(≤2.6)

(n,%)

Inadequate Response to Oral MTX (Tolerability)

20

4.46

3.65

-1.05 (18%)

28.6

8 (40%)

6 (30%)

Inadequate Response to Oral MTX (Efficacy)

29

5.34

4.08

-1.26

(25%)

34.58

7 (24%)

2 (7%)



Disclosure:

A. Hammond,
None;

M. Batley,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ra-patients-with-inadequate-response-to-oral-mtx-maintain-satisfactory-disease-control-and-durable-long-term-response-when-switched-to-sc-mtx-monotherapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology