ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2969

Mortality after Knee Replacement Surgery for Osteoarthritis in a Population-Based Propensity-Score Matched Cohort

Devyani Misra1, Tuhina Neogi2, Na Lu3, David T. Felson3, Thomas Einhorn4, Hyon K. Choi5, Jessica Maxwell6 and Yuqing Zhang3, 1Rheumatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 3Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 4Orthopedics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 5Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 6Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, Boston University, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Pain: Basic and Clinical Aspects II/Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose :

Knee replacement (KR) surgery for osteoarthritis (OA) provides improvement in symptoms and function. Whether these improvements translate into survival benefit has been unclear, likely related to selection of healthier patients for surgery, exclusion of the post-operative immortal time, and inadequate length of follow-up in prior studies. The purpose of this study was to determine risk of mortality related to KR by comprehensive adjustment for confounders using a propensity-score (PS) matched cohort approach and long follow-up.

Methods :

Participants ages 50-89 years with a diagnosis of knee OA (from Read Codes) were included from The Health Improvement Network (THIN), an electronic medical records database representative of the UK general population. High risk subjects who are less likely to be surgical candidates (BMI>40, history of joint infection, high risk cancers (pancreatic, esophageal, gastric or other metastatic), end-stage renal disease on dialysis, use of nasal cannula oxygen, or DMARD therapy) were excluded. PS for KR was calculated using logistic regression with KR as the dependent variable and the confounders listed in the table as independent variables, that reflect indications for KR and risk for poor outcomes. One year cohort-accrual blocks were created, and each KR subject was matched 1:1 by PS with a non-KR subject. Follow-up started from the index date, which was the date of surgery for KR subjects and a random date within the cohort accrual block for non-KR subjects, and continued until death or censoring. We examined the association of KR with mortality by calculating crude incidence rates (IR) and Hazard ratios (HR) using Cox proportional hazard regression. We also examined the association stratified by age category (<70years, ≥70years) as well as within percentile categories of the PS.

Results :

There were 14,675 pairs of subjects with knee OA (mean age 71yrs; 57% women; mean BMI 29kg/m2) in the PS-matched cohort. The follow-up years were 63769 and 60582 for matched KR and non-KR subjects, respectively. Overall there was 31% lower risk of mortality among subjects with KR (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.75). The lower risk remained in subjects ≥70 years but no such relation was noted in subjects <70 years (table). The crude IR for mortality among KR subjects decreased as PS percentile category increased, while no such trend was noted for the non-KR subjects. Mortality risk was lowest (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.63) in the highest PS percentile (>98%) category (table).

Conclusion :

We found KR to be protective for mortality risk among subjects ≥70 years and among those with the highest propensity for KR.  Although a protective effect of KR cannot be ruled out, there likely remains confounding by indication despite comprehensive adjustment of covariates. Patients, physicians, and surgeons consider additional factors in performing KRs that are not adequately captured within administrative databases.

Table: Association of Knee Replacement Surgery and Mortality Risk , stratified by age and by percentiles of propensity scores, in a propensity-score matched cohort of men and women with knee osteoarthritis

Score*

No. of Pairs

KR

Non-KR

HR(95% CI)

Death

Followup-years

IR

Death

Followup-years

IR

Overall

–

14,675

1233

63769.3

0.019

1636

60581.7

0.027

0.69 (0.64-0.75)

Age < 70 years

0.057

6,553

270

29413.0

0.009

291

30372.3

0.010

1.00 (0.78-1.31)

Age 70-90 years

0.055

7,911

963

34356.3

0.028

1345

30209.4

0.045

0.59 (0.52-0.68)

Propensity-score percentile category

<2%

0.005

 293

40

1391.9

0.029

50

1306.9

0.038

0.76 (0.48-1.21)

2%-10%

0.012

1174

129

5536.4

0.023

148

5231.2

0.028

0.78 (0.60-1.03)

10%-20%

0.019

1467

153

6703.1

0.023

175

6280.3

0.028

0.77 (0.60-0.98)

20%-30%

0.025

1468

142

6565.0

0.022

165

6289.7

0.026

0.76 (0.59-0.98)

30%-40%

0.032

1467

125

6510.3

0.019

157

6170.1

0.025

0.78 (0.60-1.02)

40%-50%

0.040

1468

110

6255.3

0.018

152

6088.7

0.025

0.74 (0.56-0.97)

50%-60%

0.049

1467

126

6453.4

0.019

151

6130.2

0.025

0.83 (0.63-1.08)

60%-70%

0.060

1468

118

6314.7

0.019

168

5997.9

0.028

0.60 (0.46-0.80)

70%-80%

0.075

1467

95

6301.0

0.015

149

6074.4

0.025

0.57 (0.42-0.76)

80%-90%

0.097

1468

106

6065.1

0.017

174

5639.8

0.031

0.52 (0.40-0.68)

90%-98%

0.136

1174

79

4546.6

0.017

117

4350.9

0.027

0.65 (0.47-0.90)

>98%

0.208

293

10

1120.9

0.009

30

1021.6

0.029

0.29 (0.13-0.63)

* Mean propensity score within the percentile

Confounders used for calculation of propensity score: 1) OA severity and duration 2) General (age, gender, BMI, socio-economic status); 3) Comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes (including severity), hyperlipidemia,  ischemic heart disease (including severity), heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, dementia/cognitive impairment, depression, seizure disorder, peripheral vascular disease, venous thrombo-embolism, chronic obstructive lung disease, lung infection, renal disease, liver disease,  cancers except skin cancer , cellulitis, falls, hip fracture, anemia and peptic ulcer disease ); 4) Habits (smoking status and alcohol use); 5) Health status (number of GP visits and hospitalization, albumin level); and 6) Medication use (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, opioid or non-opioid analgesics, anti-hypertensive, cholesterol lowering, insulin/oral hypoglycemic, bisphosphonates, raloxifene, strontium, glucocorticoids and anti-epileptics);


Disclosure:

D. Misra,
None;

T. Neogi,
None;

N. Lu,
None;

D. T. Felson,
None;

T. Einhorn,
None;

H. K. Choi,

Takeda,

5,

AstraZeneca,

5;

J. Maxwell,
None;

Y. Zhang,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mortality-after-knee-replacement-surgery-for-osteoarthritis-in-a-population-based-propensity-score-matched-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology