ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 32

Understanding The Stimulatory Pathways Responsible For Naïve B Cell Activation In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Emily Blalock1, Chris Scharer2, Scott Jenks1, Jeremy Boss2 and Ignacio Sanz3, 1Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 2Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 3Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: B cells, epigenetics and methylation, Gene Expression, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: B cell Function and Targeting in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a recurrent autoimmune disease characterized by multiple B cell abnormalities, including the activation of naïve B cells. However, gaps in terms of our knowledge regarding the extent and mechanisms of activation remain. We therefore investigated the expression of activation markers on activated naïve (aN) and resting naïve (rN) B cells of SLE patients as well as the stimulatory pathways responsible for their expression. 

Methods: Multidimensional flow analysis was utilized to determine levels of B cell activation markers including CD21, CD23, CD24, CD25, CD69, CD80, CD83, CD86, and IgM on aN and rN B cells of SLE patients with active disease versus healthy controls (HC). In addition, total PBMCs from SLE and HC patients were stimulated ex vivo with B cell receptor (anti-kappa or anti-lambda), T cell (CD40L), or cytokine stimulation for 16 h, 48 h, and 4 days and compared via flow analysis. Lastly, we compared the epigenome of SLE aN and rN by analyzing their genome-wide DNA methylation status using MeDIP-Seq. 

Results: Compared to HC, aN B cells, globally defined by Mitotracker green retention, from SLE patients exhibited low levels of CD21, CD24, CD69, and CD83, while CD86 levels were up-regulated. Following stimulation, aN B cells of SLE patients exhibited increased levels of CD21, CD25, CD69, CD80, CD83, and CD86 and decreased levels of CD24 at 16 h post-stimulation. Levels of CD21 and CD25 decreased at 48 h, followed by CD83 levels on day 4 post-stimulation. Expression of CD69, CD80, and CD86 remained high at all time points. However, aN B cells of SLE patients exhibited differential expression of CD23 and IgM based on stimulation type. Global DNA methylation analysis of aN B cells from an SLE patient revealed several genes, including interferon-regulated genes, were hypomethylated when compared to the HC. Interestingly, the CD83 gene was hypermethylated in aN B cells of the SLE patient; a result consistent with low CD83 levels observed via flow staining and RNASeq transcriptional analysis performed on several SLE patients.

Conclusion: Activated naïve B cells of SLE patients differentially express activation markers including CD21, CD24, CD83, and CD86. The stimulation of total PBMCs through distinct pathways reveals that activation markers are temporally expressed on aN B cells of SLE patients only to decrease with prolonged stimulation, as would be expected in vivo.  Epigenetic analysis indicated hypermethylation of CD83, a result consistent with flow and transcriptional studies. Decreased expression of CD83 could help explain several phenotypic characteristics of lupus B cells including: decreased marginal zone maturation, decreased IL-10 production, and increased Ig secretion [1, 2]. Our results provide important clues regarding abnormal B cell function, highlighting the power of integrated experimental approaches to address this problem. 

1.         Kretschmer, B., et al., CD83 modulates B cell function in vitro: increased IL-10 and reduced Ig secretion by CD83Tg B cells. PLoS One, 2007. 2(8): p. e755.

2.         Luthje, K., et al., CD83 regulates splenic B cell maturation and peripheral B cell homeostasis. Int Immunol, 2008. 20(8): p. 949-60.


Disclosure:

E. Blalock,
None;

C. Scharer,
None;

S. Jenks,
None;

J. Boss,
None;

I. Sanz,

Pfizer Inc ,

5,

Biogen Idec,

9.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-the-stimulatory-pathways-responsible-for-naive-b-cell-activation-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology