ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: LB10

Four-Year Safety and Efficacy of Deucravacitinib in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results From a Phase 2 Program

Eric F. Morand1, Cristina Arriens2, Marilyn Pike3, Joan Merrill4, Victoria Werth5, Zahi Touma6, Razvan C. Ionitescu7, Masato Okada8, Ilias Kouris9, Yogita Kolekar10, Junyu Nie10, Venkat Renukuntla10, Thomas Wegman10 and Ronald van Vollenhoven11, 1Sub-Faculty of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, 3Rheumatology, MedPharm Consulting, Inc, Bethesda, 4Department of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 5University of Pennsylvania, Merion Station, Pennsylvania, 6University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 7Medart Cliniq, Department of Rheumatology, Râmnicu Vâlcea, Romania, 8St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 9Eli Lilly and Company Global, Basingstoke, United Kingdom, 10Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, 11Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Date of first publication: October 13, 2025

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Late-Breaking 2025, Randomized Trial, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (LB01–LB18) Late-Breaking Posters

Session Type: Poster Session

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: There is a substantial unmet need for effective, well-tolerated therapies for patients with SLE. Deucravacitinib is an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor approved in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and under evaluation in phase 3 SLE studies. Deucravacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy vs placebo (PBO) in the phase 2 PAISLEY SLE study. Here, we report integrated analyses from the PAISLEY SLE (parent; NCT03252587) and PAISLEY long-term extension (LTE; NCT03920267) studies.

Methods: Patients completing the 48-week parent study while on study drug (deucravacitinib 3 mg twice daily [BID], 6 mg BID, or 12 mg once daily [QD] or PBO) were enrolled in the 3-year LTE study (Figure 1). Patients on PBO were rerandomized 1:1:1 in the LTE study to 1 of the 3 deucravacitinib doses (blinded), while those already on deucravacitinib continued their regimen for up to 4+ years of treatment (222 weeks). The LTE study allowed greater flexibility in adjustments to background treatment. Databases of the parent and LTE studies were integrated for analyses of safety through W226 and efficacy through W222. Efficacy analyses using composite measures of disease activity were summarized descriptively without formal statistical comparisons; additional efficacy results based on imputation for missing data to minimize survivor bias will be presented. For binary endpoints, 95% CIs were obtained using the Clopper-Pearson method. 

Results: Of 363 patients from the parent study, 261 (72%) were enrolled in the LTE study; 151/261 patients (57.9%) completed the study. Adverse events (AEs) with up to 4+ years of treatment are shown in Table 1; serious AEs occurred in 17%, 14.9%, and 21.8% of patients who received deucravacitinib 3 mg BID, 6 mg BID, and 12 mg QD, respectively, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13.4%, 11.4%, and 17.3%, respectively. One death deemed unrelated to study treatment occurred in the deucravacitinib 3-mg BID arm. SRI(4), BICLA, LLDAS, and DORIS remission rates were maintained over time (Figure 2); patients in the PBO arm in the parent study who switched to deucravacitinib achieved improvements that were broadly comparable to those of continuously treated patients from ≈W72 (Figure 2). CLASI-50/70 and JC-50/100 responses were maintained consistently throughout the LTE study, with increased responses seen in the PBO-switch arm. The incidence of moderate to severe flares was low across all treatment arms. 

Conclusion: Integrated analysis of the PAISLEY SLE and LTE studies confirmed the consistent safety profile and sustained efficacy of deucravacitinib in SLE with up to 4+ years of drug exposure, with no new safety signals despite complex background therapies. Patients who switched from PBO during the LTE study achieved outcomes comparable to those treated from baseline. These data represent the longest follow-up of a TYK2 inhibitor in SLE to date, supporting the potential of deucravacitinib as a durable future treatment option, currently under evaluation in phase 3 POETYK SLE trials (NCT05617677; NCT05620407).

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: E. Morand: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 1, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, 2, 5, 6, Dragonfly, 1, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, EMD Serono, 1, 2, 5, 6, Genentech – Hoffman La Roche, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein, 1, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, Quell, 1, 2, 5, Remegen, 1, 2, 6, Takeda, 5, Union Chimique Belge (UCB), 1, 2, 5, Zenas, 1, 2, 6; C. Arriens: AstraZeneca, 1, 5, 6, Aurinia, 1, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 5, Cabaletta, 1, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, Health & Wellness Partners, 1, Kezar, 1, Synthekine, 1, UCB, 1; M. Pike: AstraZeneca, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, UCB, 2; J. Merrill: AbbVie, 2, 6, Alexion, 2, Alumis, 2, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Aurinia, 2, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Chief Advisor for Clinical Development for Lupus Foundation of America, 1, EMD Serono, 2, Genentech, 2, Gilead, 2, GSK, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, Merck, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, Provention, 2, RemeGen, 2, 6, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2, Zenas, 2; V. Werth: AbbVie, 2, Alpine Immune Sciences, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, AnaptysBio, 2, argenx, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Cabaletta Bio, 2, Calyx, 2, Caribou, 2, CESAS Medical, 6, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 5, Crisalis, 2, CSL Behring, 2, 5, Cugene, 2, EMD Serono, 2, Evommune, 2, Gilead, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Horizon, 2, 5, Immunovant, 2, Innovaderm, 2, Kyowa Kirin, 2, MAPI Trust, 9, Merck, 2, NEKTAR, 2, Nuvig Pharmaceuticals, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Priovant, 5, Regeneron, 2, 5, Rome Pharmaceuticals, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, Ventus, 2, 5, Viela, 2, 5, Xencor, 2; Z. Touma: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, EMD Serono, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, Janssen, 2, Merck, 2, UCB, 2; R. Ionitescu: AbbVie, 6, Accord Healthcare, 6, Alfasigma, 5, 6, Angelini, 6, AstraZeneca, 6, Biofarm, 6, Bleu Pharma, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Egis, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Ewopharma, 6, Fiterman, 6, Galapagos, 5, Gilead, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 6, Grünenthal, 5, Idorsia, 5, Immunovant, 5, Janssen, 5, 6, Krka, 6, mAbxience, 5, Menarini, 6, Merck, 5, MSD, 6, Naturalis, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, Otsuka, 5, Pfizer, 5, 6, Roche, 5, 6, Sandoz, 6, Sanofi, 6, Servier, 6, Stada, 6, Sun Wave, 5, 6, UCB, 6, Zentiva, 6; M. Okada: None; I. Kouris: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 3, 11; Y. Kolekar: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 3, 11; J. Nie: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 3, 11; V. Renukuntla: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 3, 11; T. Wegman: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 3, 11; R. van Vollenhoven: AbbVie, 1, 2, 6, Alfasigma, 5, AnaptysBio, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 1, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 2, 5, 6, Cabaletta, 1, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 1, 2, 5, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 2, 6, Janssen, 1, 2, 6, Kyowakirin, 1, 2, 6, Merck/MSD, 1, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, 6, RemeGen, 1, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 1, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 1, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Morand E, Arriens C, Pike M, Merrill J, Werth V, Touma Z, Ionitescu R, Okada M, Kouris I, Kolekar Y, Nie J, Renukuntla V, Wegman T, van Vollenhoven R. Four-Year Safety and Efficacy of Deucravacitinib in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results From a Phase 2 Program [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/four-year-safety-and-efficacy-of-deucravacitinib-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-results-from-a-phase-2-program/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/four-year-safety-and-efficacy-of-deucravacitinib-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-results-from-a-phase-2-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology