ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2693

CAR T-cell Therapy in SLE: A Systematic Review

Alberto Nordmann-Gomes1, Leila Khalili2, Wei Tang3, Laura Geraldino-Pardilla4, Yevgeniya Gartshteyn5, Robert Clancy4, Stephen Suh6, Maya Souvignier6, Michel Sadelain6 and Anca Askanase2, 1Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 2Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 3Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, 4Columbia University, New York, NY, 5Columbia University Medical Center, Glen Rock, NJ, 6Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), T Cell

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment II (2693–2698)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:30AM-11:45AM

Background/Purpose: CAR T-cell therapy is poised to revolutionize the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Recently, several authors have reported their experience using CAR T-cell therapy for patients with SLE; nonetheless, all studies are limited by a reduced sample size. Here, we review and summarize the available clinical evidence published or presented to date on the use of CAR therapy in SLE.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review to evaluate all clinical studies assessing safety and efficacy outcomes of CAR therapy in SLE. MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL were consulted, as well as the ACR Convergence 2024 Archives.

Results: The search strategy yielded 4,943 results, of which 14 studies were included in the analysis (including 8 from the consulted databases and 6 from the 2024 ACR Archives). The studies had a combined population of 98 participants. All studies included patients with refractory and active SLE who had failed at least 2 immunosuppressive therapies. Most studies (n=12 [85%]) used a CD19-targetted CAR, with only 2 groups (15%) assessing bispecific CD19-BCMA CAR T-cells. Two studies (15%) evaluated allogeneic CAR products. All groups reported successful B-cell depletion, typically achieved within 1–3 weeks, and B-cell reconstitution was observed after 2-3 months by most groups. Pooled analysis of the 63 individual SLEDAI scores available showed a median decrease in SLEDAI of 6 points (IQR: 3.5 – 8.5) at month 1, 8 points (IQR: 6 – 9.3) at month 3, and 8 points (IQR: 6 – 12) at month 6. The mean baseline SLEDAI of 12.8 (95% CI 11.7-13.8) decreased to 3.6 (95% CI 2.5-4.7), and 2.3 (95% CI 1.1-3.5) after 3 and 6 months; respectively. Thirty-one (48%) patients had a SLEDAI score of 0 at their last follow-up, and 59 (91%) had a score of 4 or less. There was no difference in efficacy between autologous vs allogeneic products, or between CD19-targeted vs CD19- and BCMA-targeted therapies. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 56 (57%) participants, of which 50 (89%) were grade 1, 5 (9%) grade 2, and 1 (2%) grade 3. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was reported in 3 patients (3%), 1 grade 1, 1 grade 3, and 1 grade 4. Twenty-one patients (21%) developed infections, of which six (28%) were severe. Severe (grade 3 or 4) and prolonged ( >28 days) hematologic toxicity was observed in 17 (17%) and 8 (8%) patients; respectively. Among the 5 studies analyzing B-cell phenotypes, all reported a marked increase in naïve B-cell populations (CD20+, CD27−) alongside a significant reduction in memory B-cells (CD20+, CD27+). Among the 40 patients in which serum biomarkers were measured, anti-dsDNA levels decreased in 36 (90%) patients and normalized in 29 (73%). Complement levels normalized in 37 (93%) patients.

Conclusion: This systematic review showed consistent efficacy with decrease in SLEDAI from 12.8 at baseline to 2.3 at 6 months after CAR T-cell. CRS and ICANS were milder and less frequent than expected from oncology data. The findings further support the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality while highlighting the need for additional research to better define its role in SLE management.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. SLEDAI reduction in studies evaluating CAR T-cell therapy in patients with SLE

Supporting image 2Figure 2. Safety outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with SLE

Supporting image 3Figure 3. B-cell phenotypes after CAR T-cell infusion in patients with SLE


Disclosures: A. Nordmann-Gomes: None; L. Khalili: None; W. Tang: None; L. Geraldino-Pardilla: Aurinia, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 2, 6; Y. Gartshteyn: None; R. Clancy: None; S. Suh: None; M. Souvignier: None; M. Sadelain: Alaya.bio, 5, Atara biotherapeutics, 12, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has licensed Sadelain lab CAR technologies to this company, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 12, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has licensed Sadelain lab CAR technologies to this company, Celgene, 12, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has licensed Sadelain lab CAR technologies to this company, Fate Therapeutics, 5, Juno, 12, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has licensed Sadelain lab CAR technologies to this company, Minerva biotechnologies, 12, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has licensed Sadelain lab CAR technologies to this company, Senescea, 12, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has licensed Sadelain lab CAR technologies to this company, Takeda pharmaceuticals, 12, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has licensed Sadelain lab CAR technologies to this company; A. Askanase: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Aurinia, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Idorsia, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, NKARTA, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nordmann-Gomes A, Khalili L, Tang W, Geraldino-Pardilla L, Gartshteyn Y, Clancy R, Suh S, Souvignier M, Sadelain M, Askanase A. CAR T-cell Therapy in SLE: A Systematic Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/car-t-cell-therapy-in-sle-a-systematic-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/car-t-cell-therapy-in-sle-a-systematic-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology