ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2653

First Prospective Evaluation of Recombinant Herpes Zoster Vaccine in Systemic Sclerosis: Immunogenicity, Safety, and Disease Activity Outcomes

Ana Paula Luppino-Assad1, Renata P Mello2, Ana C Medeiros-Ribeiro3, Nadia E Aikawa4, Sandra G Pasoto3, Leonard V Kupa5, Renata Miossi6, Percival D Sampaio-Barros6, Eduardo Borba7, Eloisa Bonfa7 and Clovis Artur Silva8, 1Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, SAO PAULO, Brazil, 2Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 3Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 4Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Instituto da Criança e do Adolescente, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil., Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 5Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 6Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, 7Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil, 8University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Infection, prevention, Scleroderma, Systemic

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical III (2651–2656)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 10:00AM-10:15AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients are at higher risk of herpes zoster (HZ) due to underlying immune dysregulation and immunosuppressive therapies. Vaccination is a key strategy for preventing HZ. Although the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV/Shingrix®) is approved for immunocompromised individuals, its immunogenicity, safety, and impact on disease activity (DA) have not been specifically evaluated in SSc patients. This study aimed to evaluate the humoral immune response to RZV in immunosuppressed SSc patients compared to healthy controls, to identify factors influencing vaccine response, and to assess RZV safety profile and impact on patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) using validated scores.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 76 immunosuppressed SSc patients (≥18 years) and 304 healthy individuals (≥50 years) in control group (CG) received two RZV doses. SSc patients were randomized to vaccine (P1) or placebo (P2) at D0 and D42, with unblinding at D84, after which P2 also received RZV (D84, D126). Anti-glycoprotein E antibody (Anti-gE) levels were measured at baseline and 6-week visit after vaccination using an in-house GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)’s enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A humoral response was defined as ≥4-fold the pre-vaccination concentration. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) and factor increase (FI) were calculated. PROM and DA was assessed by EULAR Systemic Sclerosis Impact of Disease (ScleroID), Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and patient/provider’s global assessments

Results: Female sex was similar between groups (p >0.05). SSc patients were younger [53.0 (46.0-61.0) vs 55.0 (52.0-61.0), p=0.002] years, more often Black (44.1 vs 19.4%, p< 0.001), had lower body mass index (p=0.005), and more chronic kidney disease (p=0.001). At 6-week visit after the 2nd dose, humoral response was observed in 92.6% of SSc and 99.7% of CG (p=0.001). SSc had a significantly lower GMT [5.8 (95% CI 4.4-7.7) vs 12.6 (95% CI 11.6-13.6), p< 0.001], and FI at D84 [31.0 (95% CI 20.6-46.6) vs 59.4 (95% CI 51.4-68.8), p< 0.001] compared to CG (table 1). No demographic or immunosuppressive therapy predicted impaired vaccine response. Local adverse events were less frequent in SSc patients (73.7 vs 86.5%, p=0.024) with significantly low rates of pain, erythema and edema at injection sites (p< 0.05). Systemic reactions were comparable overall (59.2 vs 61.5%, p=0.712), although dyspnea (p< 0.001), tremor (p=0.018) and vomiting (p=0.032) were more common among SSc patients. DA parameters and PROM (ScleroID, mMRC, CDAI, and patient/provider's global assessments) showed no significant differences between vaccinated (P1) and placebo (P2) groups at baseline, D42, D84 (p >0.05). Rates of worsening across validated DA measures were similar between groups at all time points (p >0.05) (Table 2).

Conclusion: RZV is safe and highly immunogenic in immunosuppressed SSc patients, without affecting DA as measured by validated scores. However, lower antibody titers raise concerns about long-term protection, underscoring the need for ongoing monitoring in this population (ClinicalTrials NCT05879419).

Supporting image 1SSc – systemic sclerosis; CG – control group; GMTs – Geometric mean titers (AU/mL); Frequencies of humoral response are presented as number (%) and they were compared using two-sided chi-square test between SSc and CG at D84 (12-week after first vaccine dose). Ig-gE IgG titers and factor increase in GMT are expressed as geometric means with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Data regarding anti-gE titers were analyzed using ANOVA with repeated measures and 2 factors [2 groups (SSc vs. CG), at 2 time points (D0 and D84)], followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons at neperian logarithm (ln)-transformed data. GMT and factor increase in GMT were compared using Mann-Whitney test for intergroup comparisons in ln-transformed data at pre-specified time points (D0 and D84). All analyses were two-side

Supporting image 2PtGA – Patient’s Global Assessment; PrGA – Provider’s Global Assessment; ScleroID – EULAR Systemic Sclerosis Impact of Disease questionnaire; CDAI – Clinical Disease Activity Index; mRSS – Modified Rodnan Score; mMRC – Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale. Deterioration in established validated assessment tools were defined: increase in ScleroID of ≥ 0.48; CDAI > 6.5; mRSS ≥ 5; mMRC ≥ 1. Mann-Whitney test was used for intergroup comparison.


Disclosures: A. Luppino-Assad: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5; R. Mello: None; A. Medeiros-Ribeiro: Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) (2022/12925-8), 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5; N. Aikawa: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5; S. Pasoto: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (305242/2019-9), 5, Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) (2022/12925-8), 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5; L. Kupa: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5; R. Miossi: None; P. Sampaio-Barros: None; E. Borba: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (303378/2022-0), 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5; E. Bonfa: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) #305242/2019-9, 5, Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) (2022/12925-8), 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5; C. Silva: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (304984/2020-5), 5, Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) (2022/12925-8), 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Luppino-Assad A, Mello R, Medeiros-Ribeiro A, Aikawa N, Pasoto S, Kupa L, Miossi R, Sampaio-Barros P, Borba E, Bonfa E, Silva C. First Prospective Evaluation of Recombinant Herpes Zoster Vaccine in Systemic Sclerosis: Immunogenicity, Safety, and Disease Activity Outcomes [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/first-prospective-evaluation-of-recombinant-herpes-zoster-vaccine-in-systemic-sclerosis-immunogenicity-safety-and-disease-activity-outcomes/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/first-prospective-evaluation-of-recombinant-herpes-zoster-vaccine-in-systemic-sclerosis-immunogenicity-safety-and-disease-activity-outcomes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology