ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2533

Patterns of skin lesion transcriptomics in different forms of vasculitis

Karyssa Stonick1, Luciana Yamamoto de Almeida2, Seolkyoung Jung3, Faiza Naz4, Alice Fike4, Kaitlin Quinn4, Shubhasree Banerjee5, Christopher Hansen6, David Cuthbertson7, Anthony Fernandez8, Nader Khalidi9, Tanaz Kermani10, Carol Langford11, Carol McAlear5, Christian Pagnoux12, Rennie Rhee5, Peter Merkel5, Robert Micheletti13 and Peter Grayson14, 1National Insitute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 3National Institutes of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, 4National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 5University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 6University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 7University of South Florida, Tampa, 8Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Westlake, OH, 9McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 10University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, 11Cleveland Clinic, Moreland Hills, OH, 12Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 13Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 14National Institutes of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Chevy Chase, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: genomics, skin, Vasculitis, Cutaneous

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2524–2546) Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The systemic vasculitides are a family of rare diseases defined by immune-mediated inflammation and destruction of vasculature. Causal etiologies of most forms of vasculitis are unknown. Classification schemes to distinguish between forms of vasculitis typically rely on the clinical pattern of disease and do not incorporate biologic data about immune dysregulation. This study aimed to determine the relationship between tissue transcriptomics and clinical diagnoses by profiling skin lesions from patients with different types of vasculitis.

Methods: Patients with skin lesions attributed to one of nine pre-specified vasculitides were recruited into a multi-center prospective observational cohort. Bulk RNA was extracted from 4-6 mm punch biopsies of affected skin using a TRIzol-cholorform method (New England Biolabs Next Ultra II RNA library kit) and sequenced on a Nextseq 2000/NovaseqXPlus (Illumina).

Results: 70 patients underwent punch biopsies of vasculitic skin lesions. The cohort included patients with isolated cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis (CSVV) (n=18), IgA vasculitis (IgAV) (n=15), VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1-enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome (n=10), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) (n=7), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) (n=6), polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) (n=6), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) (n=3), urticarial vasculitis (UV) (n=4), or cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CryoV) (n=1) . The skin lesion morphology included purpuric macules (PM, n = 20), purpuric papules (PP, n=20), urticarial lesions (U, n=10), nodules (N, n=9), plaques (P, n=5), retiform purpura (RP, n=5), and one patient with unknown morphology. Plotting of principal component analysis eigen scores revealed that VEXAS samples clustered independently from the other forms of vasculitis in this cohort (Figure 1). There was no clear clustering based on skin morphology (Figure 2). Differential gene expression analysis revealed a substantial number of significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between VEXAS and the other forms of vasculitis. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis identified a relative upregulation of interferon response genes in VEXAS. The top DEGs that defined this upregulation of the interferon pathway in VEXAS relative to the other forms of vasculitis were XAF1 (log2 fold change = 4.132), ISG15 (log2 fold change = 3.494), and IFIT3 (log2 fold change = 3.453).

Conclusion: Direct profiling of affected tissue across different forms of vasculitis reveals shared and divergent pathophysiology. For example, tissue transcriptomics confirm that VEXAS has a strong interferon signature relative to other types of vasculitis. Clinical assessment of morphology without incorporation of biological data about immune dysregulation misses critical information. Our data supports that future classification schema for systemic vasculitides would benefit from the incorporation of biologic data with clinical features for the characterization of disease. This has the potential to lead to novel and personalized approaches to treatment.

Supporting image 1Figure 1: Principal component analysis grouping by type of vasculitis. Patients with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis and outliers were excluded from this analysis.

PC: Principal component. CSVV: isolated cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis (n=18), EGPA: eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n=6), GPA: granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n=7), IgAV: IgA vasculitis (n=15), MPA: microscopic polyangiitis (n=3), PAN: polyarteritis nodosa (n=6), UV: urticarial vasculitis (n=4), and VEXAS: Vacuoles, E1-enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic syndrome (n=10).

Supporting image 2Figure 2: Principal component analysis grouping by skin lesion morphology among patients with skin manifestations of vasculitis. Patients with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis and outliers were excluded from this analysis.

PC: Principal component. N: nodules (n=9), P: plaques (n=5), PM: purpuric macules (n = 20), PP: purpuric papules (n=20), RP: retiform purpura (n=5), U: urticarial lesions (n=10), and UNK: unknown (n=1).


Disclosures: K. Stonick: None; L. Yamamoto de Almeida: None; S. Jung: None; F. Naz: None; A. Fike: None; K. Quinn: None; S. Banerjee: None; C. Hansen: None; D. Cuthbertson: None; A. Fernandez: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Amgen, 6, AstraZeneca, 12,, 5, Biogen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Merck/MSD, 2, Pfizer, 12,, 5; N. Khalidi: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 6, Mallinckrodt, 6, NS Pharma, 5, Otsuka, 6, Roche, 2, Sanofi, 5; T. Kermani: None; C. Langford: AbbVie/Abbott, 12, Non-paid consultant, AstraZeneca, 5, 12, Non-paid consultant, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, 12, Non-paid consultant, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, NS Pharma, 5; C. McAlear: None; C. Pagnoux: AstraZeneca, 1, ChemoCentryx, 1, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 5, InflaRx GmbH, 1, otsuka, 1, 5, Pfizer, 1, 5, Roche, 1, 5; R. Rhee: None; P. Merkel: AbbVie, 2, 5, Alpine, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, ArGenx, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), 2, 5, CSL Behring, 2, Eicos, 5, Electra, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), 2, 5, iCell, 2, Interius, 2, Kinevant, 2, Kyverna, 2, 11, Lifordi, 11, Metagenomia, 2, Neutrolis, 2, 5, 11, Novartis, 2, NS Pharma, 2, Otsuka, 2, Q32, 2, 11, Quell, 2, Regeneron, 2, Sanofi, 2, Sparrow, 2, 11, Takeda, 2, 5, UpToDate, 9, Vistera, 2; R. Micheletti: Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, 6, Cabaletta Bio, 2, 5, 6, InflaRx, 2, 5, 6, Vertex, 2, 5, 6; P. Grayson: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stonick K, Yamamoto de Almeida L, Jung S, Naz F, Fike A, Quinn K, Banerjee S, Hansen C, Cuthbertson D, Fernandez A, Khalidi N, Kermani T, Langford C, McAlear C, Pagnoux C, Rhee R, Merkel P, Micheletti R, Grayson P. Patterns of skin lesion transcriptomics in different forms of vasculitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-of-skin-lesion-transcriptomics-in-different-forms-of-vasculitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-of-skin-lesion-transcriptomics-in-different-forms-of-vasculitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology