ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2376

Efficacy And Safety of Vunakizumab in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis Stratified by Disease Course: A Post-hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2/3 Trial

XiaoFei Shi, Liqing Zhou and He Zhang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China (People's Republic)

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2338–2376) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Vunakizumab, also known as SHR-1314, is a novel a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against interleukin-17A. A randomised, double-blind, phase 2/3 trial (NCT04840485) demonstrated a significant benefit of vunakizumab over placebo in active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) at week 16, with sustained improvements through 32 weeks. However, it remains unknown whether the effect of vunakizumab on AS varies according to disease course (DC). Here, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of this randomized, double-blind, phase 2/3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of vunakizumab in patients with active AS stratified by DC (< 5 versus ≥ 5 years).

Methods: In the phase 2/3 trial, adult patients with active AS who had either an inadequate response, intolerance, or contraindication to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were enrolled. All patients in this study fulfilled the 1984 modified New York criteria for AS and also met the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Data for this analysis were obtained from those eligible patients who were randomly assigned to receive either vunakizumab 120 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8 and 12; from week 16, all patients transitioned to treatment with vunakizumab 120 mg until week 32. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who met the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 20 (ASAS20) response criteria at week 16. Key secondary endpoints included ASAS40, ASAS5/6 and safety.

Results: A total of 440 patients were included in this analysis, of which 174 had a DC of ≥ 5 years (vunakizumab 120 mg, n = 116; placebo, n = 58) and 266 had a DC of < 5 years (vunakizumab 120 mg, n = 178; placebo, n = 88). At week 16, the ASAS20 response rates were 62.07% for vunakizumab versus 43.10% for placebo (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.09, P = 0.0196) in patients with a DC of ≥ 5 years; and in patients with a DC of < 5 years, the corresponding rates were 67.98% versus 42.05% (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.75 to 5.07, P < 0.0001). Moreover, patients switching from placebo to vunakizumab at week 16 showed improved ASAS20 at week 32 (62.50% for DC of ≥ 5 years; 66.20% for DC of < 5 years), which was comparable to those who continued on vunakizumab (68.10% and 78.09%, respectively). Similar improvements were also observed for ASAS40 and ASAS5/6 (Table 1). In terms of safety, during the 16-week period, 110 (94.83%) of 116 patients with a DC of ≥ 5 years in the vunakizumab group and 54 (93.10%) of 58 such patients in the placebo group had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); while among patients with a DC of < 5 years, TEAEs occurred in 164 (92.13%) of 178 patients and 82 (93.18%) of 88 patients, respectively. The overwhelming majority of TEAEs were mild to moderate, with the most common being upper respiratory infection (DC of ≥ 5 years: 31 [26.72%] for vunakizumab versus 20 [34.48%] for placebo; DC of < 5 years: 42 [23.60%] versus 20 [22.73%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Conclusion: Vunakizumab 120 mg showed improved efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with active AS, irrespective of DC.

Supporting image 1Table 1. ASAS response stratified by disease course


Disclosures: X. Shi: None; L. Zhou: None; H. Zhang: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shi X, Zhou L, Zhang H. Efficacy And Safety of Vunakizumab in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis Stratified by Disease Course: A Post-hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2/3 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-vunakizumab-in-patients-with-active-ankylosing-spondylitis-stratified-by-disease-course-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-a-randomized-double-blind-phase-2-3-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-vunakizumab-in-patients-with-active-ankylosing-spondylitis-stratified-by-disease-course-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-a-randomized-double-blind-phase-2-3-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology