ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2294

Comparative Analysis of Patients Included in Trials Utilizing Biologic Drugs in the Treatment of Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome

Carlota Navarro Joven1, Silvia Piunno2, Maryia Nikitsina3, CARMEN SAN JOSE MENDEZ4 and David A. Isenberg5, 1Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, 2Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy, 3University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 4Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), A Coruña, Spain, 5University College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, Sjögren's syndrome

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2290–2304) Sjögren’s Disease – Basic & Clinical Science Poster III: Treatment and Trial Outcome Measures

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Sjögren’s syndrome is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with no approved disease-modifying treatments. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) patient characteristics included in clinical trials (CTs).

Methods: This systematic review was undertaken according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, and ClinicalTrials.gov for phase II and III clinical trials of biologic drugs in pSS including ≥30 adult patients and published between 2010 and 2024. Baseline characteristics of participants and trial-related information were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results: A total of 16 publications were eligible to be included in this review, with 87.5% being published after 2017. The CTs were predominantly randomized controlled trials with a placebo arm (93.8%) and phase II trials (62.5%). The mean follow-up period was 32 weeks. The majority of the CTs (56.3%) were fully sponsored by industry sources. A summary of the main characteristics of CTs selected is shown in Table 1.Inclusion criteria often focused on high disease activity, as measured by the ESSDAI score, with 62.5% requiring an ESSDAI score ≥5. Salivary flow measures were also common, used in 43.8% of the CTs. The primary outcomes were diverse, but 56.3% of the CTs focused on reducing ESSDAI scores.The CTs included in the analysis reported a total of 1607 patients, predominantly female (94%), with a mean age of 51.0 (4.04) years. The mean time from diagnosis was 6.47 (2.48) years. Racial diversity was underreported, with only 37.5% of CTs providing data on race. Among those, 77.8% of participants were White, 11.9% were Asian, and 5.2% were Black.Disease characteristics included high anti-SSA/Ro antibody positivity (92.9%), while other immunological and serological features are shown in Table 2. Mean ESSDAI score was 9.6 (2.8) and mean ESSPRI score was 6.3 (0.88). Other measurements of subjective symptoms notably a numerical rating scale (NRS) were also assed, including an NRS for dryness, fatigue and pain mean values of 7.2/10, 6.7/10 and 5.7/10, respectively. Patient-reported measures of disease burden are shown in Table 3.Concomitant treatments were common, with 87.5% of the CTs allowing simultaneous therapies. Despite most of the CTs being multicentric (75%), global representation was limited: only five CTs recruited patients in more than two continents and no CTs recruited in Africa.

Conclusion: This review highlights key challenges in pSS CTs: notably limited patient diversity, high subjective symptom burden, and heterogeneous outcomes measures. While the use of ESSDAI/ESSPRI is rising and reporting of race and ethnicity is improving, standardization remains incomplete. Earlier intervention and broader recruitment are needed to advance pSS therapies.

Supporting image 1Table 1: Selected trials for biologics in pSS

RCT: randomized clinical trial

Supporting image 2Table 2 : Serological features of patients included in the CTs

Data are mean (SD), median (min, max), or percentages.

ANA=antinuclear antibodies; anti-La/SSB= antibodies against Sjögren’s Syndrome B; RF=Rheumatoid Factor; IgG=Immunoglobulin G

Supporting image 3Table 3: Patient-reported measures of disease burden

Data are mean (SD), median (min, max), or percentages.

SF-36: Short Form-36; PCS: Physical Component Summary of SF-36; MCS: Mental Component Summary of SF-36; MFI-20: Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20.


Disclosures: C. Navarro Joven: None; S. Piunno: None; M. Nikitsina: None; C. SAN JOSE MENDEZ: None; D. A. Isenberg: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Navarro Joven C, Piunno S, Nikitsina M, SAN JOSE MENDEZ C, A. Isenberg D. Comparative Analysis of Patients Included in Trials Utilizing Biologic Drugs in the Treatment of Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-analysis-of-patients-included-in-trials-utilizing-biologic-drugs-in-the-treatment-of-primary-sjogrens-syndrome/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-analysis-of-patients-included-in-trials-utilizing-biologic-drugs-in-the-treatment-of-primary-sjogrens-syndrome/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology