ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2201

Adherence to Reproductive Health Guidelines in Lupus Care: Insights from Patient and Physician Surveys

Akhil Sood1, Leanna Wise2, Sadaf Sediqi1, Alyssa Howren1, Amanda Moyer1, Ellie Diamond1, Yashaar Chaichian3 and Julia F Simard4, 1Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 2LAGMC/Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, 3Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 4Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines, quality of care, Surveys, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2195–2226) Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Posters

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The American College of Rheumatology has established guidelines for managing reproductive health in patients with rheumatic diseases. We assessed contraception use and counseling of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) through two parallel surveys of patients and physicians in alignment with these guidelines.

Methods: Females with SLE (ages 18-50 years) who received care from a rheumatologist at an academic medical center were invited to complete a survey assessing contraception use, including effective or highly effective contraception (EHEC), and whether they received contraception counseling from their rheumatologist. Contraception counseling was defined as: a) discussion of contraception in the past year, or b) explanation of contraception given their SLE by a rheumatologist. The survey also asked about sources of reproductive health information and perceived barriers to reproductive health counseling with their rheumatologist. The physician survey invited rheumatologists and obstetricians/gynecologists (OBGYN) to complete a survey about confidence in contraception counseling rated on a Likert-scale (1= Least Confident, 5= Extremely Confident). Rheumatologists were specifically asked about timing of contraception counseling after initiating a teratogenic medication. Descriptive statistics were summarized as frequency (n, %) or median [interquartile range]. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Student’s t tests were used for bivariate comparisons.

Results: Among 102 females with SLE who completed the survey, the majority identified as White (37, 36%) or Asian/Pacific Islander (33, 32%), and had a bachelor’s degree or higher (71, 69%). Most (67, 66%) reported being sexually active and avoiding pregnancy or neutral towards pregnancy. Only 33% of all participants reported receiving contraception counseling within the past year. Fewer participants reported using EHEC (34, 33%) compared to less effective methods (47, 46%). Use of EHEC significantly differed by race (p< 0.05), with higher use among Whites (20, 54%) and lower among Asians/Pacific Islanders (7, 21%). Contraception counseling significantly differed by age, employment status, marital status, and teratogenic medication use, but these factors were not associated with the use of EHEC. Despite identifying rheumatologists as the primary source of information on SLE and reproductive health (64, 63%), many patients viewed being directed to their OBGYN as a barrier to engaging in these discussions with their rheumatologist (31, 30%).Among 200 physician respondents (rheumatologists: 116, (58%), OBGYN: 84, (42%)), rheumatologists reported higher confidence in contraception counseling (Median 4 [IQR 3–4]) compared to OBGYNs (Median 3 [3–4]). While most rheumatologists (88, 76%) reported contraception counseling at the initiation of teratogenic medications, fewer (40, 35%) reported also counseling at follow-up visits.

Conclusion: The study highlights gaps in contraception use and counseling among females with SLE. Future studies should include focus groups to identify patient, physician, and systems-level barriers to improve reproductive health delivery in SLE.

Supporting image 1Table 1: Patient Demographics and Characteristics

Supporting image 2Table 2: Physician Demographics and Characteristics


Disclosures: A. Sood: None; L. Wise: AstraZeneca, 1, 6, 7, Aurinia Pharma, 5, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 6; S. Sediqi: None; A. Howren: None; A. Moyer: None; E. Diamond: None; Y. Chaichian: Lupus Therapeutics, Lupus Research Alliance, 5; J. Simard: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sood A, Wise L, Sediqi S, Howren A, Moyer A, Diamond E, Chaichian Y, Simard J. Adherence to Reproductive Health Guidelines in Lupus Care: Insights from Patient and Physician Surveys [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adherence-to-reproductive-health-guidelines-in-lupus-care-insights-from-patient-and-physician-surveys/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adherence-to-reproductive-health-guidelines-in-lupus-care-insights-from-patient-and-physician-surveys/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology