ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1568

A Novel Endothelial Cell Profiling Assay to Identify Systemic Sclerosis Patient Characteristics at the Endothelial Cell Level

Eva Hoekstra1, Rudmer Postma1, Nils Steinz2, Wieke van Oostveen1, Roel Bijkerk1, Vincent van Duinen2, Rachel Knevel2, Tom Huizinga2, Anton jan van Zonneveld1, Jeska de Vries-Bouwstra2 and Cynthia Fehres1, 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Bioinformatics, Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1553–1591) Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Vasculopathy, a hallmark clinical feature in systemic sclerosis (SSc), is a consequence of endothelial cell (EC) damage and dysfunction and might precede tissue fibrosis. Clinical disease progression in SSc is highly heterogeneous, with some patients developing severe fibrotic complications while others are affected by severe vascular complications including pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The underlying mechanisms of this variability are poorly understood. We hypothesize that these distinct clinical phenotypes can be identified at the EC level. The objective is to investigate whether SSc patient plasma induces specific EC profiles and to examine correlations between these EC signatures and patients’ clinical features.

Methods: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to 25% citrate plasma from SSc patients from the Leiden CCISS cohort (n = 199; 61 at baseline, and 69 at baseline and 1-year follow-up) and healthy controls (HC; n = 35), according to previously published protocol (Postma RJ, 2024; doi:10.1016/j.gastha.2023.10.006). After staining, Max-projections of 9 z-steps with 0.7 µm step size were acquired using a high content confocal microscope. Single-cell morphological profiles were computed from the images and averaged to create single-patient profiles (Fig 1). The Leiden algorithm was used to detect densely connected clusters in the constructed dataset. Performance of Support Vector Machine models predicting different clinical characteristics was evaluated by repeated cross validation. Sankey plots were generated to visualize transitions between clusters after 1 year of follow-up. Validation experiments are pending.

Results: Graph-based cluster analysis of the morphological profiles identified 6 separate clusters, with high similarity between all 6-cluster solutions (adj. RAND index: 0.92). Cluster 6 represented outliers of the experiment and was therefore excluded from further analysis. HCs were predominantly found in cluster 0 (27.3%) and cluster 3 (55.9%). Figure 2 shows different SVM models that classify clinical features based on morphological data, specifically discriminating well between HC and patients (AUC 0.88 ± 0.09). Among patients, U1RNP+ patients and PAH patients showed distinct EC profiles (Fig 2). Strikingly, among patients EC profiles were clearly different between males and females, but this was not the case in HC (AUC 0.84 ± 0.08, and 0.68 ± 0.25, respectively). After 1 year follow up most patients (64.2%) migrated to a different cluster (Fig 3); patients who migrated from an SSc cluster to a HC enriched cluster (n = 8) showed stable, mild disease, whereas 50% of patients who migrated from a HC enriched to an SSc cluster (n=7/14) had disease progression.

Conclusion: Distinct morphological endothelial cell profiles were identified in SSc, especially for PAH. Interestingly, male and female EC profiles could be discriminated more clearly in SSc than in HC, indicating that sex-differences in SSc could be identified at the EC level. After 1 year follow-up, patients more often switched than remained in their original cluster, suggesting EC clusters could potentially reflect disease activity.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Morphological profiling on endothelial cell level.

Supporting image 2Figure 2. ROC curves of cross validation of SVM models with clinical characteristics.

Supporting image 3Figure 3. Transition of patients between cluster at baseline to cluster at 1-year follow-up.


Disclosures: E. Hoekstra: None; R. Postma: None; N. Steinz: None; W. van Oostveen: None; R. Bijkerk: None; V. van Duinen: None; R. Knevel: None; T. Huizinga: None; A. van Zonneveld: None; J. de Vries-Bouwstra: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 6, Jannsen-Cilag, 5, Janssen, 2, 6, Roche, 5; C. Fehres: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hoekstra E, Postma R, Steinz N, van Oostveen W, Bijkerk R, van Duinen V, Knevel R, Huizinga T, van Zonneveld A, de Vries-Bouwstra J, Fehres C. A Novel Endothelial Cell Profiling Assay to Identify Systemic Sclerosis Patient Characteristics at the Endothelial Cell Level [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-novel-endothelial-cell-profiling-assay-to-identify-systemic-sclerosis-patient-characteristics-at-the-endothelial-cell-level/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-novel-endothelial-cell-profiling-assay-to-identify-systemic-sclerosis-patient-characteristics-at-the-endothelial-cell-level/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology